It's a good question.

The microzyma transforms into whatever bacterial form is required for the task. Daily, they are literally eating all the dead internal cells that have been decayed, not unlike the dead skin on your outer skin. Additionally, there are various forms that digest the various foods that you eat in your gut "biome". Likewise, when a lifeform dies, say a squirrel in your yard, the microzyma then all transform to eat all the soft tissues of the body.

Hopefully that makes sense to you. In other words, you don't need to "get" special bacteria "out there" to perform the task at hand. And it's not like there are all these bacteria just floating around in your back yard waiting for something to die so they can decompose it.

The microzyma/somatid is always available, awaiting the next task needed.

There are a number of causes of what our establishment medicine calls "dis-ease". The majority of alternative healthcare practitioners out there chalk up the majority of this to poor nutrition and toxicity. I believe they are wrong, but that opens up a whole new topic I won't discuss with you today. Suffice it to say, I do agree with this, to an extent, for the common cold and flu type "dis-eases". However, I think these two have more to do with a person not getting outdoors enough, fresh air, interaction with nature, etc. All these activities act to detox. That's why these dis-eases happen in colder months, when people don't get outside enough.

Briefly, most dis-ease is psychosomatic in origin. Without explaining in great detail, when a "conflict shock" occurs in one's psyche, said microzyma go into action to PROTECT the body from what I'll call a primordial "perceived threat". Typically, this results in the BUILD-UP of excess tissue. The simplest example is lung cancer, which is the same exact thing as what they used to call "tuberculosis". This is caused by a lasting psychological "fear of death" conflict shock. When this occurs, the mircozyma actually create brand new lung aveoli in order to increase the amount of oxygen uptake. It's the psyche's primordial response to fearing death - more oxygen.

A "scare event" conflict shock is shorter in duration. So because it's not a long duration psychological turmoil, less time has elapsed in the creation of excess lung aveoli. The unwinding of a "scare event" is known by modern medicine as "pneumonia".

Hopefully that all makes sense. In short, scares, frights and fear of death lead to the microzyma immediately assisting with oxygen uptake. They don't have any sense of "time" or "future". They act immediately and take this psychological turmoil literally. As a lack of oxygen is the fastest way the organism can die.

Now, without further ado, onto your question. Once these "conflict shocks" are resolved in the psyche, the micorzyma then go into action to REVERSE this process of maintaining excess lung aveoli (which takes extra work and energy from the body, BTW). It is this "reversal process" that modern medicine deems "dis-ease". Which is, in fact, a return to balance/homeostasis.

Depending on the duration and intensity of the "conflict shock", this reversal process can be mild, to outright debilitating as again, the microzyma aren't aware of "time". This process is actually a "healing", as the mircozyma destroy the excess lung aveoli. However, it is called "dis-ease" and efforts are then made by modern medical practioners to deter or end this healing process with things like anti-biotics (against-life). In short, the anti-biotic short-circuits the healing process.

BTW, said "healing process" can be likened to "putrefecation" if you will. All kinds of gunk, fluid, waste-material, decayed tissue, blood etc. are generated and thus produce tremendous amounts of mucous, urine, diarrhea, etc. as the excess lung tissue is destroyed.

The introduction of the anti-biotic short-circuits this process that would have worked itself out quite naturally if left alone. Instead, the full healing process is never reached, leaving the person weaker, more vulnerable and more susceptible (in the lungs in this case) to future dis-ease.

In short, what would have occurred naturally, a few days, possibly weeks later, depending on severity, never occurs. The anti-biotic destroyed the tuberculin or pneumonia bacteria. Now the person is left with "lumps/chunks" of dead tissue in their lungs that would have otherwise been removed.

However, you do "feel better" SOONER as the full healing process wasn't allowed to proceed to completion. And in this society, that's what really matters - right? When can I get back to work/daily-life!!! Just give me a pill doc!

It's worth noting that in severe cases, within an already unhealthy, and weakened individual, the activity of the microzyma may sap what little energy/health is available and actually result in death of the individual. Typically this would be the case in the aged population, and/or someone with multiple co-morbidities already.

Thus, anti-biotics short-circuit the healing process, enabling you to "get back to normal" sooner, by kicking the can down the road, weakening your body and causing it to be more vulnerable to future dis-ease.

In a nutshell, the body ALWAYS heals itself when left to its own devices (assuming a non-life threatening event of course). There never has been, nor never will be a "pill" that could ever "assist" said process. As all healing occurs in water, the remedy is almost always drinking tons of fluids and resting. As the healing process also uses a lot of protein, eating more protein-rich foods during this process also greatly assists the body.

Hopefully that all makes sense.