No!!!!!, you should die now!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
If the intent of the artist is to cause sexual arousal, it is porn. Thus, girls wearing bikinis and grinding on each other is porn. So are the frescos in Pompeii.
If the intent of the artist is to show off the amazing mechanics of beauty of the human form, it is not porn. Thus, the statue of David and things like medical photos are not.
There's a gray area for things like ancient fertility objects, grainy black and white artsy semi-nudes, and product sales like lingerie.
People can be sexually aroused by anything, because people are twisted. So you can't look at how it makes the person feel. You must look at the intent of the artist and the creator.
This is why Bill Barr goes full bag-piper when ever he passes a KFC.
Lol dead on my man.
I can't even decipher what this means
Kek
Try explaining that to the little minor lefty demons. They don't get it.
Actually that doesn't support their effortst to undermine society and bring about the hell on earth they and their masters so desire so they are always going to try to subvert any attempt to ban one of their best tools.
You're damn right. Always a pull from the dark things in life.
fuck me bet you're fun at parties.
Lol, I try to avoid them! I'm an introvert.
Couldn't care less about porn though. It's not my vice, but I have my own (nicotine, alcohol). I consider it a vice like any other. To much of any vice can destroy a man and his family. Moderation is good. What consenting adults watch is their business. But keep it away from the kids, duh.
Lucky I dont have a family to destroy.
NOW GIMME DEM JUBBLIES!!!