Well, I don’t accept the position that I am obligated to take any position on any issue just because someone I disagree with, or even find evil, takes the opposing side.
I would never give someone that much control over what I believe, especially someone that I don’t trust.
So no, I will not consider the Q movement valid based solely on the mainstream media taking the position that the Q movement is nonsense.
I will also not take the position that the Earth is flat simply because Q believes the Earth is round.
Because again, it’s absurd to give anyone, especially the MSM, that much power over what you believe is true about reality.
If you’re going to ask me to defend Clinton, you’ll want to find someone else. I’d put money down that despite my vehement opposition to Trump, I probably put more words out against Clinton in 2016 than anyone on this board. I do not care for her.
No it's more got to do with the contents of said emails and the absolute collusion displayed by the mainstream from Hollywood to CNN and every late night talk show.
If we can acknowledge together that there was a "cabal", if you will, supporting Clinton, it's not hard to ask why they are attacking Trump.
Well, I don’t accept the position that I am obligated to take any position on any issue just because someone I disagree with, or even find evil, takes the opposing side.
It's not about obligation. It's about common sense.
Anything the lying media are breathlessly shrieking about being evil is obviously very threatening to them. Therefore it is, in all likelihood, good for America.
Taking a position just because the media is saying otherwise makes you just as easily manipulated as if you were taking a position just because the media says to do so.
The trick to critical thinking is to not assume anything.
Perhaps the media does lie and twist the truth. What that means is that you look at every one of their claims critically. Some of it might be the truth. Some of it might not be. Critical thinking is to assume you don’t know, and to evaluate the claim from a neutral position.
If you’ve already decided the outcome based entirely on your assumption about the source, then you aren’t thinking critically. You’re just letting yourself be manipulated in the opposing direction of the sheep. Which is still being manipulated.
Well, I don’t accept the position that I am obligated to take any position on any issue just because someone I disagree with, or even find evil, takes the opposing side.
I would never give someone that much control over what I believe, especially someone that I don’t trust.
So no, I will not consider the Q movement valid based solely on the mainstream media taking the position that the Q movement is nonsense.
I will also not take the position that the Earth is flat simply because Q believes the Earth is round.
Because again, it’s absurd to give anyone, especially the MSM, that much power over what you believe is true about reality.
Just curious. What is your position on the Clinton email leaks?
Ha. Which ones?
How about the ones that dropped November 5th 2016?
Do you think they connect to Seth Rich's murder?
I’m not super convinced on the Seth Rich stuff, but I’m also not hugely invested in it, because I do not care for Hillary Clinton.
Asking the right questions.
If you’re going to ask me to defend Clinton, you’ll want to find someone else. I’d put money down that despite my vehement opposition to Trump, I probably put more words out against Clinton in 2016 than anyone on this board. I do not care for her.
No it's more got to do with the contents of said emails and the absolute collusion displayed by the mainstream from Hollywood to CNN and every late night talk show.
If we can acknowledge together that there was a "cabal", if you will, supporting Clinton, it's not hard to ask why they are attacking Trump.
Why is he such a threat to them?
I see Trump as a meteor. Whether you’re a good person or a bad person, him being POTUS was a problem for you. Not everyone, clearly.
But the world isn’t that black and white. Being an enemy of Hillary Clinton is not enough to claim you’re on the right side of history.
It's not about obligation. It's about common sense.
Anything the lying media are breathlessly shrieking about being evil is obviously very threatening to them. Therefore it is, in all likelihood, good for America.
Taking a position just because the media is saying otherwise makes you just as easily manipulated as if you were taking a position just because the media says to do so.
The trick to critical thinking is to not assume anything.
Perhaps the media does lie and twist the truth. What that means is that you look at every one of their claims critically. Some of it might be the truth. Some of it might not be. Critical thinking is to assume you don’t know, and to evaluate the claim from a neutral position.
If you’ve already decided the outcome based entirely on your assumption about the source, then you aren’t thinking critically. You’re just letting yourself be manipulated in the opposing direction of the sheep. Which is still being manipulated.