Why would it matter if Biden was intending to drag out the lockdown for four years if the Plan is ostensibly to have Trump back in office MUCH sooner than that?
Let’s say the Plan means having Trump back in office by December. I think most people here would agree with that.
Let’s also say that NCSWIC.
If those two things are true, then who cares if the Deep State wanted to lock us down for 20 years?
Trump is back in December, because NCSWIC. He would have ended the lockdown himself.
If NCSWIC, and Trump the one we’re talking about, then releasing a poison vaccine to prevent a 20 year lockdown is stupid. Because the Plan was always that Trump is back well before then. No need to kill people with the vaccine.
I mean, this is pretty much what all non-Q people believe about the vaccine. Trump was in an election and the virus was causing problems, and he wanted to have that win before the election.
So he Warp Speeded the vaccine to make sure it was his win before people cast their votes in order to mitigate the damage the virus could do to his campaign. And now he's continuing to remind people that the vaccine is his and he deserves credit for it.
Kind of surprised to see something so close to the "mainstream" theory of the vaccine presented here in Q world.
So the vaccine is a placebo currently, in which case it's perfectly safe to take?
Or it used to be a placebo, but is dangerous now? In which case, why is Trump continuing to call it safe and "a lifesaver" if it's no longer the placebo?
Not sure why the poster deleted their response to you, but I'll assume it was this logic:
So the vaccine is a placebo currently, in which case it's perfectly safe to take?
You must've meant perfectly unnecessary if such were true.
If - side effects are being reported and documented, people are experiencing medical issues after vaccination, and some even dying - the argument was never "all vaccines are placebos."
Given the fear of the words, vaccine hesitancy, do you not speculate how much we are not being told?
On top of that - why are there some very adverse reactions, like sickness over the course of days and even weeks, while others feel little difference than before? Why give those who received the Placebo shot the same level of rights as those who received the real deal?
Do you simply never ask questions like this?
You - many outsiders, and even many (most) here miss the point of opposing the vaccine passport, the vaccine mandates, and the threat of firing for the unvaccinated.
This isn't about being Anti-Vax. Q himself counteracts the concept;
In no statement, does he attempt to COERCE the American people, into getting this vaccine. If they want it - they can get it. If they don't - so be it.
When an employer threatens repercussion - Coercion.
When a government demands it for a passport - Coercion.
When it becomes mandatory - Coercion.
"Permissible Medical Experiments"
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
The existence of Placebo injections show everything people here need.
These vaccines are an experimental procedure, and none of the above rules have been followed.
Trump gave us the vaccine, yes. Only Tyrants have tried to make it mandatory.
The only reason I brought it up in the first place is because IF the vaccine is currently saline, as some people here suggest, then that means it’s perfectly safe. Saline is definitionally safe. And since most people here do NOT think the vaccine is safe, I just thought it was an odd theory for Q World.
Q isn't here. Only anons are. Anons are all unique individuals and theories people have that aren't related to Q drops are just that. Nobody's here speaking for the "movement." They're speaking for themselves or shilling.
Q World is a big tent kind of place! 🎪 😎 But we draw the line at clowns: no clowns allowed, unless they've completely disavowed being clowns in action and have flipped, making them contortionists or trapeze-types.
In order for Biden to credibly take credit they need to somehow establish that this vaccine is not the same as the one Trump pushed through which they spoke out against over and over. When they do that and take credit they are busted for changing Trump's vaccine into whatever it is now.
Also, Trump promotes the 'vaccine'. We all know what is being pushed at us now is NOT a vaccine.
I also wonder whether Trump supporting Pfizer/Moderna was part of the contract with the vaccine makers before they would release it earlier than expected. The contract with Pfizer that was recently released had something in it where the country was not allowed to disrespect the company or its products.
Seeing how the "vaccine" is performing I wouldnt want credit.
Time will tell of all the wheels and deals behind the scenes, it was better to have a vaccine than stay on lockdown but the jab itself is not worth taking credit for in my opinion. Big pharma needs to die.
Also he knew Biden and his masters would have dragged out the lockdowns another 4 years at least, he ruined their easy excuse.
Why would it matter if Biden was intending to drag out the lockdown for four years if the Plan is ostensibly to have Trump back in office MUCH sooner than that?
You are so dumb your mother became pro abortion after you were born.
There is a swamp plan, and a patriots plan.
Patriots plan stopped the swamps plan.
I don’t think you understand.
Let’s say the Plan means having Trump back in office by December. I think most people here would agree with that.
Let’s also say that NCSWIC.
If those two things are true, then who cares if the Deep State wanted to lock us down for 20 years?
Trump is back in December, because NCSWIC. He would have ended the lockdown himself.
If NCSWIC, and Trump the one we’re talking about, then releasing a poison vaccine to prevent a 20 year lockdown is stupid. Because the Plan was always that Trump is back well before then. No need to kill people with the vaccine.
I think most people here agree that you would be a datefagger commie cunt and then leave it at that.
I mean, this is pretty much what all non-Q people believe about the vaccine. Trump was in an election and the virus was causing problems, and he wanted to have that win before the election.
So he Warp Speeded the vaccine to make sure it was his win before people cast their votes in order to mitigate the damage the virus could do to his campaign. And now he's continuing to remind people that the vaccine is his and he deserves credit for it.
Kind of surprised to see something so close to the "mainstream" theory of the vaccine presented here in Q world.
So the vaccine is a placebo currently, in which case it's perfectly safe to take?
Or it used to be a placebo, but is dangerous now? In which case, why is Trump continuing to call it safe and "a lifesaver" if it's no longer the placebo?
Not sure why the poster deleted their response to you, but I'll assume it was this logic:
You must've meant perfectly unnecessary if such were true.
If - side effects are being reported and documented, people are experiencing medical issues after vaccination, and some even dying - the argument was never "all vaccines are placebos."
I remember when Israel was the first to break the news regarding Myocarditis.
1:100,000 officially recognized, became 1:20,000 as per findings of the researchers, by the release of the article. That is a "risk." Enough of a "risk" that the CDC now prominently features a glaring warning regarding Myocarditis.
Given the fear of the words, vaccine hesitancy, do you not speculate how much we are not being told?
On top of that - why are there some very adverse reactions, like sickness over the course of days and even weeks, while others feel little difference than before? Why give those who received the Placebo shot the same level of rights as those who received the real deal?
Do you simply never ask questions like this?
You - many outsiders, and even many (most) here miss the point of opposing the vaccine passport, the vaccine mandates, and the threat of firing for the unvaccinated.
This isn't about being Anti-Vax. Q himself counteracts the concept;
u/#q1010
This is about refusing to be coerced into a medical procedure.
Furthermore, this is about refusing to be coerced into an EXPERIMENTAL medical procedure.
Liberty of the individual, extends to their right to determine the medical treatment they see as fit for themselves. Trump showed this when he opened the gateway for Americans to opt for experimental medical trials. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/30/trump-signs-right-to-try-legislation-on-experimental-medicines.html
In no statement, does he attempt to COERCE the American people, into getting this vaccine. If they want it - they can get it. If they don't - so be it.
When an employer threatens repercussion - Coercion.
When a government demands it for a passport - Coercion.
When it becomes mandatory - Coercion.
"Permissible Medical Experiments"
The existence of Placebo injections show everything people here need.
These vaccines are an experimental procedure, and none of the above rules have been followed.
Trump gave us the vaccine, yes. Only Tyrants have tried to make it mandatory.
The only reason I brought it up in the first place is because IF the vaccine is currently saline, as some people here suggest, then that means it’s perfectly safe. Saline is definitionally safe. And since most people here do NOT think the vaccine is safe, I just thought it was an odd theory for Q World.
Q isn't here. Only anons are. Anons are all unique individuals and theories people have that aren't related to Q drops are just that. Nobody's here speaking for the "movement." They're speaking for themselves or shilling.
Q World is a big tent kind of place! 🎪 😎 But we draw the line at clowns: no clowns allowed, unless they've completely disavowed being clowns in action and have flipped, making them contortionists or trapeze-types.
Half of it.
Here's the other half.
https://www.rt.com/uk/530020-zahawi-fully-vaccinated-placebo-nhs-app/
Near future Google trend:
Thank you, Operation Warp Speed.
Saved Millions of Lives.
VERRRY interesting.....
<strokes beard>
Ever wonder why people have such different reactions to the vaccine?
"I got it, and my arm just hurt," vs. "I got it, and I was sick as fuck for a few days."
"Got it and I died."
In order for Biden to credibly take credit they need to somehow establish that this vaccine is not the same as the one Trump pushed through which they spoke out against over and over. When they do that and take credit they are busted for changing Trump's vaccine into whatever it is now.
Also, Trump promotes the 'vaccine'. We all know what is being pushed at us now is NOT a vaccine.
I also wonder whether Trump supporting Pfizer/Moderna was part of the contract with the vaccine makers before they would release it earlier than expected. The contract with Pfizer that was recently released had something in it where the country was not allowed to disrespect the company or its products.
Seeing how the "vaccine" is performing I wouldnt want credit.
Time will tell of all the wheels and deals behind the scenes, it was better to have a vaccine than stay on lockdown but the jab itself is not worth taking credit for in my opinion. Big pharma needs to die.