The variant should provoke symptoms faster than the Delta-4, and respiratory stress happen fast at the onset.
No word on how the models were designed. No word on how they know there will even be a "deadly" variant, and how it will even act if it doesn't even exist right now.
I'm flabbergasted.
The only silver-lining I can see from this prediction, is that if it's deadlier and faster to show symptoms, then it will be easier to contain and accelerate the end of the scamdemic, as the big problem of the 'rona is the relative silence allowing "asymptomatic spread".
So ridiculous.. that these people are allegedly so educated but so fucking dumb.
"Hey, I heard the new round of fear is scheduled to be released in October.."
Intelligence <> Wisdom
"Wow, Doc, so you're telling me there's going to be a new strain of flu this winter? Why don't you tell me what else is new?"
I wonder how much that fuckass paid for that worthless degree.
We've known this doc for decades. He's also an EMT and a ME. He doesn't lack practice and he's getting old. He is known throughout all the medical establishments on the island of Corsica (an island of 330k people).
He's the only one who looked far into my mother's fibromyalgia, at a time when it was a "trashbin disease" that's been used as a diagnosis for a bunch of other diseases, decredibilizing it entirely when it comes to officially recognizing the disease as a handicap for the purpose of government programs related to housekeeping help. He doesn't take free time, his only preoccupation is the well-being of his patients. I've seen it. He fought with her as she was slowly crumbling from the constant muscle pain.
He also told us he's pro-vaccination but that forced vaccination is against his ethics. I've asked him, knowing I'm in my 30s and kinda overweight, if it's a good idea for me to take it, he could only tell me he's pro-vaccination again, not that it was a good or a bad idea. I left from there without a clear answer.
I've looked into both sides of the argument on the jab. I'm not clear on the testing (one side says they've been through the standard safety tests and the current trials are normal, the other says it's still experimental, the only clear indication on any clinical trial estimated time of completion is from Pfizer's website, and in 2023), I'm not clear on the side-effects and the death rates, I'm not clear if those numbers are even accurate, I'm not clear on alternative treatments, I'm in a goddamn fog. I hate this.
As I mentioned in a thread I started.
What you have to ask yourself.
Are you prepared to taking the vaccine in a REPEATED fashion?? To stay "Up-To-Date" on the latest anti-virus solutions?
This is where this is going.
So you have to ask yourself. Are you injecting something that you will HAVE to have other treatments going forward.
That's my reason for not taking it so far.
I am not anti-vaccine at all. I am for surely for vaccine CHOICE!
But..
If they make it a repeated thing for life. That's kind of like Mark of the Beast for me.
95% of age 70+ recover. 99.5% of 50+ recover. 99.95% of youth recover. It is treatable with HCQ and Ivermectin to damn near 100% and America's Frontline Doctors will telemed a prescription if needed.
If you're unsure, you can always change your mind later if you deem the info credible enough to justify the jab. But you can never change your mind after you take it. That's my rationale. I want it to play out in others for many years to see the long term effects before I put something in my body that is statistically unnecessary, medically treatable and completely experimental.
Everything we are hearing is changing day to day. Facts are nearly impossible to find. You can't undo this decision.
That's the other thing, I've looked into HCQ. Raoult seemed on the right track, considering he's looked into the drug after the first epidemy of SARS/MERS, of which some studies pointed at CQ as a potential drug against them. I remember finding this study too.
The only double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with a large patient pool (the gold standard of clinical trials) of HCQ I found showed no real difference between that and the placebo for patients treated with early COVID19. Granted, there's no AZ or Zinc. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-4207
Ivermectin, I found the site ivmmeta.com which lists no less than 60 studies, a lot of which are gold-standard as mentioned above, but that may play on my confirmation bias of "anything but those rushed so-called vaccine". How many such gold-standard studies are there still out there showing no real effect? I don't know. I'm not a doctor, and even now my faith in doctors has severely decreased.
I remember the Mediator scandal, a drug that was prescribed for type-2 diabetes which had actually no real effect. Officially, 500 people died from it, other counts are into the 1500 to 2000, and that led to its removal after showing its complete lack of effect and even its toxicity. Was it tested and approved by the authorities? Yes. And that scares the hell out of me.
Discrediting*** Also, don't take the experimental injection please.
I think you need a new doctor, one who knows how to think for himself.
Either the vaxxed are creating a super strain that will kill me. Or they are creating a super strain that will end them...
50/50.
Another point I've made in the past.
We're told "there's no link between vaccination and the appearance of new variants".
We're also told "do not overuse antibiotics, as antibiotic-resistant strains will need stronger and stronger antibiotics until either of them kills us", because of the same genetic system known as "mutation", or "evolution".
Why the contradictory messaging?
Finally, how come new variants seem to pop up across several countries at the same time despite the original strain having taken months to reach various regions of the world? Fishy. Extremely fishy
Yep. I like my immune system. I'm gonna choose to keep it in tact. Got Ivermectin and HCQ in the closet just in case. I'm chill AF.
Letting you know that they will be activating 5G on a large scale.
All of the people with the Graphene Oxide in their bodies will Fry.
That strain sounds like ADE.
Tell him you are slated to see a new variant of doctor in October.
It’s simple. People will be getting boosters in October.
I guess this one will be called the "Mad Vax Variant" because these made up variants are driving the sane people mad. They need to quit lying and making this crap up before God brings his wrath down on them.
All prediction models are bs. They're meant to help induce panic and fear to get the 'right' reaction to the problem.
Predictive programming at its best.
Is that really a prediction model or pre-release publicity from a certain bioweapon lab?
That was my red flag. How come "they" know such a variant would occur?
Waves of Fear technique.
The sad part is that the vaccinated will be much more vulnerable to new iterations being rolled out than the people with natural immunity.
The vaccinated have antibodies with a very specific target - just one protein.
The people with natural immunity have developed antibodies with a broad spectrum of targets, so variants will have a tougher time of it.
Dr Li-Meng Yan, the Chinese scientist who escaped China and appeared on Bannon's War Room Pandemic, said that the virus was developed as a weapon and that they made 11 variants. I'm not sure she was sure of that specific number.
I've heard about the "specific target" effect of the vaccines on the immune system. I'm still doubting considering how the immune system works, but it seems to make sense.
Peak vaccinations were around April/May. Oct/Nov is going to be brutal for the vaxxed.
Updoot for use of "flabbergasted"
Do these models "know" that evolution for a virus invariably moves in the direction of lower lethality? Becoming more lethal is not a successful evolutionary survival strategy for a virus that depends on its host for replication.
Depends. Becoming more lethal in a context where lower lethality already led to a part of the elderly dying but not the active spreaders is a non-issue.
Lethality can increase while keeping under a threshold to allow spreading among the active, young population, to the older population who has more of a chance to die.
Your doc is a conspiracy theorist.