Nah he means sterilize the virus. It's a virology term to mean a human cannot host or fall ill from a specific virus.
What he is saying is if it's not 100% sterilization, it's dangerous as variants linger in some people and eventually morph into something super dangerous.
It's a really important point as too why if something isn't a vaccine, you probably shouldn't call it one and definitely shouldn't use it as one.
Correct. They never have in history. Not. One. Time. They do evolve into more contagious but less deadly versions frequently.
However it does really sound like this guy is just speaking about vax trials in general and the process that is followed along the way to approval, and he doesnt have any specific dirty details we may be looking for... remember guys not every doctor on the planet is in on this.
He 1000% meant sterilize the virus. That is normal parlance for this kind of thing. Vaccines aim to sterilize viruses, regardless of what type they are.
The outcome of the "TRIAL". HMMM..well color me surprised, I thought this had, had a trial phase, oh yeah, that's where 100% of the animals died. So he meant human trials.
“These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilise the population…”
“The regulators will need to look quite closely to make sure it’s done what we need it to do…”
“There will be a delay between the outcome of the trial and a decision whether it can be approved AS A VACCINE…”
Did someone remove this dude’s glowie filter before he went on TV? Talk about loose lips sinking ships…!
Nah he means sterilize the virus. It's a virology term to mean a human cannot host or fall ill from a specific virus.
What he is saying is if it's not 100% sterilization, it's dangerous as variants linger in some people and eventually morph into something super dangerous.
It's a really important point as too why if something isn't a vaccine, you probably shouldn't call it one and definitely shouldn't use it as one.
I don’t think he meant that at all, and variants don’t morph into “more powerful viruses” to the best of my knowledge
He did mean that. And yes the vaccine has the capability to make something more dangerous, these things have happened https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous
Correct. They never have in history. Not. One. Time. They do evolve into more contagious but less deadly versions frequently.
However it does really sound like this guy is just speaking about vax trials in general and the process that is followed along the way to approval, and he doesnt have any specific dirty details we may be looking for... remember guys not every doctor on the planet is in on this.
Read freedom2520's post. They do not evolve to something more deadly, however the vaccine can make them more deadly.
Yes but why didn't he say those words.
Also you dont get to be a Sir unless you are a Cabal member I can guarantee you that
It's a 1 minute clip cut off way short.
If he actually means sterilize the virus, he should clarify that. Definitely highly suspicious though. Freudian slip?
He 1000% meant sterilize the virus. That is normal parlance for this kind of thing. Vaccines aim to sterilize viruses, regardless of what type they are.
Are you a virologist? How do you know 1000%?
yes but hard to tell with a 1 minute clip. Would have to see more to kmow what he meant.
The outcome of the "TRIAL". HMMM..well color me surprised, I thought this had, had a trial phase, oh yeah, that's where 100% of the animals died. So he meant human trials.