Probable cause is not proof of a crime. It's a complete contradiction to claim to agree with innocent until proven guilty while simultaneously thinking that you can make absolute statements of guilt from behind a computer screen with no trial needed.
And just ask the patriots who were arrested for peacefully protesting on January 6th about "proof" being needed for an arrest. The ones who are being denied a speedy trial and being held in cells for 23 hours a day when they haven't even been convicted of a crime or allowed to argue their case. I guess they were "obviously guilty" too and deserve it?
The issue here is NOT that he is a Dem or that he was photographed with AOC. The issue is moral turpitude. Don't kid yourselves - the Reps have plenty of dirty persons in their own ranks. the good news here is not that we "got" a Dem - it is that we got a moral degenerate and that means one less on the streets.
And here's a pic of Trump woth Epstein and the Clintons!!!!
This trend needs to stop. You, OP and every other dumb fuck who upvoted this needs to stop and reevaluate their position. This is the type of lolgic the left uses and we need to stop.
The platform is supposed to educate. Not make baseless cheapshots.
Yes he is. If he is convicted, or if he is denied bond and forced to stay in jail until his arraignment, then that leaves us one vote away from being able to hold Maricopa county board of supervisors in contempt. We just have to get one of the rhinos out of the way or another Democrat.
I think it's less that AOC is necessarily guilty of whatever this guy is accused of, but rather that if we assume everybody has dirt on them, then whose dirt gets released when and where matters.
So I read OP's listing of AOC as a question:
What message might white hats be trying to send about AOC/Kamala/etc. by releasing the dirt on this particular state senator from AZ who had some ties to them, when they could have just as easily released other state representatives dirt?
And I will say that a lot of celebrity politicians go around the country appearing for candidates as a political capital investment, so it's absolutely the case the photos could be meaningless.
I couldn't tell ya w/respect to any of the three, other than it seems the cabal still has some level of control and autonomy and is still fighting back.
Because you are innocent until proven otherwise.
lol that's where their owned pedo judges and DA's come in...
system is broken
"Trump's obviously guilty of colluding with Russia so why don't we just make Hillary president?"
Same logic.
Nothing like that. Trump was obviously innocent. This man is obviously guilty. Huge difference between the two.
Impeccable analysis.
"Obviously" is only in the eyes of the (potentially corrupt) government doing the enforcing.
Conviction is at least harder to corrupt. We know the russiagate was corruption. We know this will probably lead to conviction.
We also know they would use "obviously" as a weapon with fake evidence
Says the guy who doesn't believe in innocent until proven guilty. One of the big pillars of a free and fair society.
Probable cause is not proof of a crime. It's a complete contradiction to claim to agree with innocent until proven guilty while simultaneously thinking that you can make absolute statements of guilt from behind a computer screen with no trial needed.
And just ask the patriots who were arrested for peacefully protesting on January 6th about "proof" being needed for an arrest. The ones who are being denied a speedy trial and being held in cells for 23 hours a day when they haven't even been convicted of a crime or allowed to argue their case. I guess they were "obviously guilty" too and deserve it?
It is obviously a bad idea to use the word obvious, ever.
Tell that to the cancel culture nitwits.
The issue here is NOT that he is a Dem or that he was photographed with AOC. The issue is moral turpitude. Don't kid yourselves - the Reps have plenty of dirty persons in their own ranks. the good news here is not that we "got" a Dem - it is that we got a moral degenerate and that means one less on the streets.
And here's a pic of Trump woth Epstein and the Clintons!!!!
This trend needs to stop. You, OP and every other dumb fuck who upvoted this needs to stop and reevaluate their position. This is the type of lolgic the left uses and we need to stop.
The platform is supposed to educate. Not make baseless cheapshots.
Douche
Oh, he's with donkey-face......two asses side by side....
To be accurate, though, there are a lot of them in the District of Criminals...LOL!
inverted trans people
If they both weren't Satanic Pedos, they wouldn't be in the club.
And the fact this was in Arizona...was he a vote standing in the way to finish the audit possibly?
Yes he is. If he is convicted, or if he is denied bond and forced to stay in jail until his arraignment, then that leaves us one vote away from being able to hold Maricopa county board of supervisors in contempt. We just have to get one of the rhinos out of the way or another Democrat.
Why does her smile look like a snarl? It’s like she doesn’t know how to smile and someone told her she had to at least try.
LLOL gnashers, that’s great
Mr.Ed and Mr.Ped
There's a theory that nearly all politicians have something on them--some proclivity--that is required for them to advance.
If that is true (hard to verify), then white hats could in theory pick who they arrest and send messages.
This arrest just seems like too much of a coincidence to not have more meaning.
For the record, I'm not the one downvoting you.
I think it's less that AOC is necessarily guilty of whatever this guy is accused of, but rather that if we assume everybody has dirt on them, then whose dirt gets released when and where matters.
So I read OP's listing of AOC as a question:
What message might white hats be trying to send about AOC/Kamala/etc. by releasing the dirt on this particular state senator from AZ who had some ties to them, when they could have just as easily released other state representatives dirt?
And I will say that a lot of celebrity politicians go around the country appearing for candidates as a political capital investment, so it's absolutely the case the photos could be meaningless.
I couldn't tell ya w/respect to any of the three, other than it seems the cabal still has some level of control and autonomy and is still fighting back.
Yep. Totally agree. These types of posts need to be removed or at the very least discouraged. The fact that they are being stickied is disgraceful.
This place is starting to feel more like controlled opposition than actual informative content.