It is a sad time when humanity is being forced to choose between feeding their families and being injected with poison. And of course in that article there is a link to an article saying Memphis hospitals are strained with un-vaccinated patients.
My family eats a lot of chicken, and we will never buy Tyson products again. We will find chicken made by a company that is not anti-American and which believes in human rights.
People have been pointing out that it’s not accurate to call it a “vaccine”, since it doesn’t fit the definition of a vaccine aside from how it is administered, via a needle.
And yet everyone keeps calling it a “vaccine” out of ease of communication.
But what about “injection”?
I think “jab” has worked a little bit, but it’s still too cutesy. The “shot” is too neutral.
But calling it “the injection”? That seems to work better to me. You aren’t being cute, you aren’t being colloquial. It’s not slang like “vax”. But it takes the emphasis off the medical value of the “vaccine” and puts it onto the action of injection the state is attempting to take. This makes it sound creepier and more aggressive. It’s much easier, I think, to persuade people against “mandatory injections” than it is “mandatory vaccines”. We want to convey that impression of what a violation of bodily autonomy it is to hold someone down and inject a needle into their veins against their will.
A companies mandate is not a law. Only legislators are empowered to create law. When fighting this sort of thing, people really, really, really need to understand their Constitutional rights. The constitution doesn't 'give' us rights, those are considered inalienable and from God. The constitution 'guarantees' our rights. So look to the constitution for your guaranteed right to liberty. Liberty means freedom. The freedom to make your own decisions regarding your own body. What could be more natural or more God Given?
Amendments 9 and 14 section 1 are, imho, the go to articles. But a case could be made for 4 and 8 as well, in my opinion. Know your constitution and know your rights.
Awesome! Even if the shelves go completely empty of Tyson products it’s worth it.
It is a sad time when humanity is being forced to choose between feeding their families and being injected with poison. And of course in that article there is a link to an article saying Memphis hospitals are strained with un-vaccinated patients.
Boycott all Tyson products. I already don’t buy their crap. But if I did, I’d stop.
My family eats a lot of chicken, and we will never buy Tyson products again. We will find chicken made by a company that is not anti-American and which believes in human rights.
No mandate?
Somewhere, Barry Soetoro is triggered.
Here is another part of the food chain to not support.
Never again allowing Tyson products in this home!
Freedom, not tyranny!
Just in time to really ramp up the food shortage
People have been pointing out that it’s not accurate to call it a “vaccine”, since it doesn’t fit the definition of a vaccine aside from how it is administered, via a needle.
And yet everyone keeps calling it a “vaccine” out of ease of communication.
But what about “injection”?
I think “jab” has worked a little bit, but it’s still too cutesy. The “shot” is too neutral.
But calling it “the injection”? That seems to work better to me. You aren’t being cute, you aren’t being colloquial. It’s not slang like “vax”. But it takes the emphasis off the medical value of the “vaccine” and puts it onto the action of injection the state is attempting to take. This makes it sound creepier and more aggressive. It’s much easier, I think, to persuade people against “mandatory injections” than it is “mandatory vaccines”. We want to convey that impression of what a violation of bodily autonomy it is to hold someone down and inject a needle into their veins against their will.
I agree. I never call it a vaccine, and tend to vacillate between injection and jab.
Injection is good ..actually Euthanasia injection
No surprises here. I've been boycotting them for years:
https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2016/02/02/Why-37-Year-Old-Clinton-Financial-Scandal-Still-Relevant
A companies mandate is not a law. Only legislators are empowered to create law. When fighting this sort of thing, people really, really, really need to understand their Constitutional rights. The constitution doesn't 'give' us rights, those are considered inalienable and from God. The constitution 'guarantees' our rights. So look to the constitution for your guaranteed right to liberty. Liberty means freedom. The freedom to make your own decisions regarding your own body. What could be more natural or more God Given?
Amendments 9 and 14 section 1 are, imho, the go to articles. But a case could be made for 4 and 8 as well, in my opinion. Know your constitution and know your rights.
Edit didn't work. That should say amendments, not articles. Also, I am aware of grammatical errors but can't edit them.
Thanks for the tip.
Yeah editing is very glitchy on .win sites for some reason. Often it's easier to just reply to yourself to make an addendum.