Phil Waldron said a poison pill was planted in the data which would corrupt devices that receive it. Spoke right after Lindell said he was attacked last night. They are now making sure any files are free of viruses.
The story that's been going around is saying an expert on Mike Lindell's Red Team (Josh Merritt) wasn't too happy about the fact the actual PCAPs are NOT available, only the data itself. The claims are that the actual source, Dennis Montgomery (NSA whistleblower and creator of the Hammer & Scorecard), has the actual PCAPs. And Montgomery supposedly had a stroke on the eve of the cyber symposium. đź‘€
"Mr. Merritt and Mr. Wiebe said the missing packet captures could be a result of either the format the data was sent in or they were withheld by the source of the information, Dennis L. Montgomery."
This story may be fake news, tbh. I read in another thread that that is exactly what Mike Lindell said this morning (I haven't had time to watch myself). We'll just have to wait and see what happens in regard to the packet captures yet today (hopefully). The Gateway Pundit also did a similar story to this Wash Times piece and Mike apparently said it was all fake news. I hope I have time to tune in later. I'm interested to see how this turns out. It was the PCAPs that were promised (and needed).
I don't know if he is or not. I know he has had alcohol problems in the past. He's under a federal gag order (like Gen. Flynn was). He created the Hammer and Scorecard systems, and when he saw how they were being misused, he became a whistleblower. They destroyed his life for doing that, basically. All I know is, that Dr. Dave Janda, William Binney, and Kirk Wiebe all trust him and vouch for him (in spite of his "issues").
I do understand, but on the other side you risk to invalidate the evidence, plus, if the states end up getting from DHS the capture they were hinting at, if DHS/others intent to manipulate something, you can catch them easily comparing them
Also, the people there it's not tech at all, do you know what does it take to really understand what's in it? they will release a report with the findings and everything, but throwing out 37tb of unusable data for most, could end up being even more dangerous
That makes sense to me. I couldn't imagine the size of this information being realistically faked in any real way, especially assuming they tested at least some of it to line up with externally known instances.
If that's the case, there are a very limited number of places this could have come from.
Yes it's the same i think, Mark seems to act somehow stupid (not so tech expert), but sometimes slips and seems instead to know well what he's talking about
So we have 2 possible scenario, personally i think it's B
A) packets are fake and all of this is just more show
B) highly classified sources provided that data, and Mike has it all, he's too sure to be going around with fake shit, but that classified source SHOULD NOT be revealed, and this event it's just a series of trap for the DS (look the office raids, intimidations, etc etc)
Getting concerned also. I thought all this is a build up for a layperson to understand before the pcaps come out so there would be a base understanding what people were looking at.
I know the PCAPS are important. But whatever happens with them it doesn't change the absolute Mt. Everest of evidence that has already been shown and provided that Biden is a fraud, did not win the election and is not the president.
Whether you trust him or not, it certainly doesn't help the case to not release them, or given the size, at least walk people through a demonstration of deconstructing some of the data.
Here's all this analysis of these PCAPs! The original PCAPs and source of the data? No, you the public don't get to look at that ... trust us, we have "reasons"
sounds awfully similar to
Here's all these vote certifications! The original paper ballots and chain of custody documents? No, you the public don't get to look at that ... trust us, we have "reasons"
I just assumed when he said ppl were in the back rooms working on something In the beginning, I thought that’s what he meant. I have no idea how long it takes to look at these PCAPS, again just assumed, it would take the whole 3 days. Ok, still waiting.
I heard that too. Portions of the data have been shown in his ultimate proof videos. Phil Waldron said this morning the data was hacked and a poison pill placed in it. Now they have to scrub it.
Problem is the source, if he got it from confidential sources (MIL/NSA/SF), he can't simply release and tell it to the people
I think that's why they are pushing to have states themselves, ask for the captures
Fluid situation. Something about DHS Albert sensors?
Just made a thread about it
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvyoxdru/albert-sensors--was-this-the-tra/c/
Searching for info on the architecture and how / for what have been installed etc (Curiosity, but i'm an IT engineer myself), found two link until now
Phil Waldron said a poison pill was planted in the data which would corrupt devices that receive it. Spoke right after Lindell said he was attacked last night. They are now making sure any files are free of viruses.
The story that's been going around is saying an expert on Mike Lindell's Red Team (Josh Merritt) wasn't too happy about the fact the actual PCAPs are NOT available, only the data itself. The claims are that the actual source, Dennis Montgomery (NSA whistleblower and creator of the Hammer & Scorecard), has the actual PCAPs. And Montgomery supposedly had a stroke on the eve of the cyber symposium. đź‘€
"Mr. Merritt and Mr. Wiebe said the missing packet captures could be a result of either the format the data was sent in or they were withheld by the source of the information, Dennis L. Montgomery."
Source - for what it's worth:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/11/mike-lindells-lead-cyber-expert-says-they-cant-pro/
Why would Josh go running to the Washington Times?
This story may be fake news, tbh. I read in another thread that that is exactly what Mike Lindell said this morning (I haven't had time to watch myself). We'll just have to wait and see what happens in regard to the packet captures yet today (hopefully). The Gateway Pundit also did a similar story to this Wash Times piece and Mike apparently said it was all fake news. I hope I have time to tune in later. I'm interested to see how this turns out. It was the PCAPs that were promised (and needed).
Montgomery may be a plant. He also conviently "had a stroke" the night before he was supposed to produce the NSA stuff on Sherif Apario.
I don't know if he is or not. I know he has had alcohol problems in the past. He's under a federal gag order (like Gen. Flynn was). He created the Hammer and Scorecard systems, and when he saw how they were being misused, he became a whistleblower. They destroyed his life for doing that, basically. All I know is, that Dr. Dave Janda, William Binney, and Kirk Wiebe all trust him and vouch for him (in spite of his "issues").
Some Operation Freedom videos regarding this: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLz_DyFaVTgW3pGM_KkxTt0pJFpXtE4_zc
I hadn't heard about his previous stroke, or the Sheriff Arpaio story before. Sounds interesting though...
I do understand, but on the other side you risk to invalidate the evidence, plus, if the states end up getting from DHS the capture they were hinting at, if DHS/others intent to manipulate something, you can catch them easily comparing them
Also, the people there it's not tech at all, do you know what does it take to really understand what's in it? they will release a report with the findings and everything, but throwing out 37tb of unusable data for most, could end up being even more dangerous
Excellent point this is why the hackers or Cyper security personal has to sign papers.
That makes sense to me. I couldn't imagine the size of this information being realistically faked in any real way, especially assuming they tested at least some of it to line up with externally known instances.
If that's the case, there are a very limited number of places this could have come from.
Yes it's the same i think, Mark seems to act somehow stupid (not so tech expert), but sometimes slips and seems instead to know well what he's talking about
So we have 2 possible scenario, personally i think it's B
A) packets are fake and all of this is just more show B) highly classified sources provided that data, and Mike has it all, he's too sure to be going around with fake shit, but that classified source SHOULD NOT be revealed, and this event it's just a series of trap for the DS (look the office raids, intimidations, etc etc)
They said ASK MIKE LINDELL.
I AGREE. Lindell says he has the data. He's been claiming for months he would show real PCAPs, If he doesn't show some real stuff, he's full of bluff.
Getting concerned also. I thought all this is a build up for a layperson to understand before the pcaps come out so there would be a base understanding what people were looking at.
I trust Lindell, but I don’t trust that he hasn’t been given bad information.
I know the PCAPS are important. But whatever happens with them it doesn't change the absolute Mt. Everest of evidence that has already been shown and provided that Biden is a fraud, did not win the election and is not the president.
Whether you trust him or not, it certainly doesn't help the case to not release them, or given the size, at least walk people through a demonstration of deconstructing some of the data.
He has a video playing the PCAP data captures, however the resolution is so bad you can't see it
Here's all this analysis of these PCAPs! The original PCAPs and source of the data? No, you the public don't get to look at that ... trust us, we have "reasons"
sounds awfully similar to
Here's all these vote certifications! The original paper ballots and chain of custody documents? No, you the public don't get to look at that ... trust us, we have "reasons"
I just assumed when he said ppl were in the back rooms working on something In the beginning, I thought that’s what he meant. I have no idea how long it takes to look at these PCAPS, again just assumed, it would take the whole 3 days. Ok, still waiting.
I heard that too. Portions of the data have been shown in his ultimate proof videos. Phil Waldron said this morning the data was hacked and a poison pill placed in it. Now they have to scrub it.
What?!? I was gone for awhile today. No PCAPS?!?!
Yes- it feels like a thrown together jumble. I want to love Lindell, but I just don’t
I haven't been able to watch all morning because of work. Has he hinted toward releasing them before the symposium ends? Any specific time?