I work in telecom and while 5G phones are being sold and 5G might appear on the phone as service, the data providers have not yet switched 5G data on as of yet. It's just a marketing scheme at the moment.
I'm also not sure about the fears related to 5G. I don't have any proof to date that 5G should be a concern.
Also in telecom, and this is mostly correct. (Not sharing this for you, obviously, since you know your stuff, but just clarifying for anyone that wants to be pedantic.)
5G is broken into three tiers: Low, Mid, and High band. All three are technically available, but only high band meets the performance criteria most people associate with 5G. However, High band has a LOT of problems, and doesn’t logistically work in areas that are not wide open with a ton of people to justify the infrastructure.
Low and Mid bands, while they are technically 5G, are not at the frequencies or capabilities of high band 5G.
So while these companies are not overtly lying about having 5G, they are intentionally vague about which version you’re receiving.
Low band 5G is functionally no different than 4G.
Mid band 5G is functionally no different than LTE (though it is still markedly higher speed).
High band is the one everyone is concerned with, but it is so cost prohibitive that it’s only seen in a few major hot spots globally, and the signal doesn’t reliable penetrate glass.
Don't forget about the beamforming aspect of 5G tech - it's a privacy nightmare, as the tower can pinpoint your exact location with beamforming. Shooting the data signal directly to your location, instead of in your general vicinity with 4G/LTE current tech.
Well for now no proofs it is linked to "vaccine". But anyway cancer rates possible growth (higher irradiation due to higher energy density per square surface unit with 5G), and problem with bees isn't nothing. For sure 5G shouldn't be really in agricultural regions, problems with pollination would lead to HUGE agricultural crisis, maybe even to famine. Faster internet or apples on the tree ? Stupid choice,you wouldn't eat faster internet.
should be simple enough to test, find the wavelength/spectrum of 5g technology, subject a sample of graphene oxide, see what happens.
it appears to be magnetic, almost like ferrofluid, betting on it having an inductive response...
would work great in a crowd control situation... just crank up the dial and cook them inside out.
imagine being on the verge of worldwide acceptance that you and all your friends have at the very least been fucking kids and trading them around like currency in your social circles... (or much much worse depending on what you think they might be up to and what is or isn't well poisonings to make us all look crazy for talking about this stuff).
i'd bet if even a fraction of what we think these people have been doing gets accepted as fact they are going to need an "off switch" for us plebs...
the closer we get to AZ audit the harder they push for people to get their shot of graphene oxide...
i guess they need to rush things along before people start building gallows along the potomac.
yeah i mean it's the first thing i thought of when i first saw the magnet-sticking-to-the-injection-site videos that started popping up...
i love my induction cooker here at home, great with cast iron, but it made it easy to imagine what that effect would have inside someone's body when i learned about the graphene oxide.
again, i have zero evidence this is even possible... it's just the first thing i thought of when it looked like people are being injected with magnetic shit.
what better way to stop 100k people marching in the streets demanding your head on a pike than having a button you can press that cooks 70% of them.
"In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting
like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological
cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure
could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic
waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to
shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in
liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced.
These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce
these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size
of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like
structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells."
The paper says the same thing multiple times throughout it. Kind of seems fake to me. I don't know enough about what is being said to know any better. But copying and pasting the same claim 3-4 times is suspect.
I work in telecom and while 5G phones are being sold and 5G might appear on the phone as service, the data providers have not yet switched 5G data on as of yet. It's just a marketing scheme at the moment.
I'm also not sure about the fears related to 5G. I don't have any proof to date that 5G should be a concern.
Also in telecom, and this is mostly correct. (Not sharing this for you, obviously, since you know your stuff, but just clarifying for anyone that wants to be pedantic.)
5G is broken into three tiers: Low, Mid, and High band. All three are technically available, but only high band meets the performance criteria most people associate with 5G. However, High band has a LOT of problems, and doesn’t logistically work in areas that are not wide open with a ton of people to justify the infrastructure.
Low and Mid bands, while they are technically 5G, are not at the frequencies or capabilities of high band 5G.
So while these companies are not overtly lying about having 5G, they are intentionally vague about which version you’re receiving.
Low band 5G is functionally no different than 4G.
Mid band 5G is functionally no different than LTE (though it is still markedly higher speed).
High band is the one everyone is concerned with, but it is so cost prohibitive that it’s only seen in a few major hot spots globally, and the signal doesn’t reliable penetrate glass.
Thank you, Dreamscapes, for typing out the full explanation. No excuses,but I'm on mobile and got lazy. 😎
And this is necessary information to anyone concerned over the frequency threat!
Great info, thanks.
Don't forget about the beamforming aspect of 5G tech - it's a privacy nightmare, as the tower can pinpoint your exact location with beamforming. Shooting the data signal directly to your location, instead of in your general vicinity with 4G/LTE current tech.
Well, in my area I am getting full expected speeds of 5G (100-150 Mbps) whereas on 4G I get the expected speeds of roughly ~45 Mbps.
That said it is suspicious how much they are willing to take losses on phones that have 5G just to get people on it.
Well for now no proofs it is linked to "vaccine". But anyway cancer rates possible growth (higher irradiation due to higher energy density per square surface unit with 5G), and problem with bees isn't nothing. For sure 5G shouldn't be really in agricultural regions, problems with pollination would lead to HUGE agricultural crisis, maybe even to famine. Faster internet or apples on the tree ? Stupid choice,you wouldn't eat faster internet.
should be simple enough to test, find the wavelength/spectrum of 5g technology, subject a sample of graphene oxide, see what happens.
it appears to be magnetic, almost like ferrofluid, betting on it having an inductive response...
would work great in a crowd control situation... just crank up the dial and cook them inside out.
imagine being on the verge of worldwide acceptance that you and all your friends have at the very least been fucking kids and trading them around like currency in your social circles... (or much much worse depending on what you think they might be up to and what is or isn't well poisonings to make us all look crazy for talking about this stuff).
i'd bet if even a fraction of what we think these people have been doing gets accepted as fact they are going to need an "off switch" for us plebs...
the closer we get to AZ audit the harder they push for people to get their shot of graphene oxide...
i guess they need to rush things along before people start building gallows along the potomac.
yeah i mean it's the first thing i thought of when i first saw the magnet-sticking-to-the-injection-site videos that started popping up...
i love my induction cooker here at home, great with cast iron, but it made it easy to imagine what that effect would have inside someone's body when i learned about the graphene oxide.
again, i have zero evidence this is even possible... it's just the first thing i thought of when it looked like people are being injected with magnetic shit.
what better way to stop 100k people marching in the streets demanding your head on a pike than having a button you can press that cooks 70% of them.
"In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells. DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure. This structure could be divided into linear, toroid and round inductors. Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves, move and produce some extra waves within the cells. The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal and pentagonal bases of their DNA source. These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus. To fill these holes, some extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced. These bases could join to each other and form virus-like structures such as Coronavirus. To produce these viruses within a cell, it is necessary that the wavelength of external waves be shorter than the size of the cell. Thus 5G millimeter waves could be good candidates for applying in constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses (COVID-19) within cells."
Sorry. This sounds like pure speculation. No citation.
The paper says the same thing multiple times throughout it. Kind of seems fake to me. I don't know enough about what is being said to know any better. But copying and pasting the same claim 3-4 times is suspect.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200722140203/https:/www.biolifesas.org/biolife/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/FIORANELLI.pdf