I hear you, but if we look in the win\lose column, I pretty much see a string of win for DS, and not many loses, so far. One can attribute some of that to the "a basket of fruit never un-rots" analogy, but the destruction of our institutions, our society, and our freedoms is not occurring at a natural rate, is being driven to occur, and continuing the rot process is a down hill event, where as reversing the rot, is nearly straight up hill.

Would you agree with the premise that "time is not on our side"? What effort is required in order for the masses to restore the US to a place of virtuous living? Truth is it take a lot of effort, by every member of society, and there is no chance of this happening without God underpinning our national character. Then how much effort does it take for society to continue rotting? Why it take no effort at all. Becoming bad is the result of not doing good, where as being good, is not the result of not being bad, it is the result of doing good.

Their power is dwindling - what evidence do we really have that the DS level of power, on a practical level is dwindling. Assuming that as has always been, that we see only what they want us to see, how do we know what they are holding in reserve. For example, do we really know how far along Google is in it's development of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), or for that matter ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence). The advent of AGI, will speed up the race to ASI, and if we don't have solid plans in place to make sure ASI is human friendly well before ASI come into being, we are all in great danger of extinction. (Read Our Final Invention by James Barrat.)

A computer logicboad can have voltages in a range of 115 to 125 volts without sensing an over/under voltage condition, in other words, no degrading of function, and a half dead rattle snake can still kill you, so I would not put much hope into a weakening DS machine cause one of it's cylinders has taken to misfiring.

I did too read Devolution 1 - 8, but I am generally opposed to people who post information about what plan the good guys may be implementing to save the world.

If the person really believes they have a solid line on "The Plan", if they really believe what they are reporting is true, why would they be interested in informing our enemy.

Even if they are totally wrong, or just partly right, the information they give could stimulate our enemy to a thought they otherwise would not have had.

In my view, the only time reporting our sides plan would be acceptable is:

If the enemy already knows of it, and the purpose is just to inform us.
If the plans implementation has progressed to the point that the enemy
knowing of it does no harm.
It's reporting is meant as disinformation.

I am open to having my mind changed. Can you tell me why I am wrong?

Can you tell me what good purpose is served by one side digging to uncover the master plan to take out the enemy, and telling the enemy what it is.

Imagine if everyone in England would have worked day and night to figure our where and when the allies were going to invade, and and squealed it to the Germans.