The enemy uses neuro-linguistic programming in an effort to control your thoughts.
(media.greatawakening.win)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (60)
sorted by:
Chlorine dioxide literally is bleach, though. I have used it as such when cleaning lab stuff, that exact chemical.
And unless you're taking Ivermectin that was prescribed to you, most people talk about "horse dewormer" because that's where people are trying to get access to Ivermectin without a prescription. Through livestock dewormer. It's the "getting this as a horse paste that was never tested on nor approved for humans" part that people are ridiculing specifically.
We aren't mislabeling these things when people are literally using these products off-label.
Chlorine dioxide doesn't stop being bleach just because you decide that it's medicine and drink it, especially when it's being drunk from a bottle that's packaged and labeled as a cleaning product.
Appropriating products for uses that they're not supposed to be used for and then demanding that everyone else recognize what you believe to be true sounds far more like neurolinguistic programming than does calling a product what it says on the box.
Why are you here shilling for big pharma?
Clinical studies with chlorine dioxide. Bleach is sodium hypochlorite.
Here's a review of ivermectin on amazon from someone who treated themselves., many such cases.
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Ivermectin Could Have Saved ‘Millions’ of Lives — But Doctors Were Told Not to Use It
Bleach is a substance that bleaches things (ie, removes stains, usually). There are a few compounds that are legally and scientifically considered "bleach."
I don't think you actually read the study about the chlorine dioxide, because it was an in vitro experiment that basically proves this bleach kills MRSA. In a dish. Not in the body. Note, from your paper:
They mention that people use it as a medication, but it wasn't what they tested. They demonstrated that bleach kills bacteria in a dish. Which we knew. Which is why we use it as a bleach. This is pretty clearly stated in the paper if you read it. They want you to believe that it might be okay to drink, but their study doesn't even explore that possibility, because again, they did this experiment in vitro, not in vivo.
I don't accept Amazon reviews as scientific proof of anything other than the notion that people sometimes write and post stuff on Amazon.
I am not contesting that Ivermectin could be useful against COVID. I don't know. What I do know is that horse dewormer is a mystery vial that happens to contain Ivermectin.
If you're afraid of what might be in the vaccine, despite it having an ingredients list in which every component has been tested and approved for humans, then I can't understand why you'd rather eat a paste that is absolutely chock full of stuff that was never intended for human consumption nor ever tested on humans.
And I have absolutely no love of Big Pharma. Whatsoever. But being against Big Pharma doesn't mean trusting absolutely any random passerby that isn't Big Pharma. The world is not binary. Knowledge is much bigger than having only two sides.
You looked at one study on the page and then act like it is the only one there because you are a dishonest piece of shit. The study RIGHT NEXT TO IT is one about chlorine dioxide being used internally with no ill effects.
This is why scumbag shill liars should not be allowed on this sub, because you willfully spread misinformation about potential life saving effects of these drugs and everything else.
I have no idea why the mods let you waste everyone's time with your dishonest bullshit here.
From the study, one of many at the link:
If you want me to read a specific study, then send me a link to a specific fucking study, dude. I'm not the one wasting time when you throw a bunch of papers at me, some of which are clearly garbage for your argument, and act like I'm the one putting you out by not digging through them. I'm not getting paid for my time talking with you.
Are you talking about this one?
https://andreaskalcker.com/en/coronavirus/clinical-study-with-chlorine-dioxide/a-retrospective-observational-study-on-the-efficacy-of-chlorine-dioxide-for-the-prophylaxis-of-symptoms-similar-to-those-of-covid19-in-relatives-living-with-patients-with-this-disease.html
It's important to note in this study that they didn't actually test anything. They just talked with people who said they took this particular chemical while having symptoms that were apparently close enough to COVID-19.
As someone who has read thousands of scientific papers, that is a LOT of serious limitations for this to be a decisive study. Which is why they don't claim it is a decisive study.
This study proves nothing. It's an exploratory study that is commonly done specifically to create opportunity for actual studies later on down the road. They tested nothing, just made observations after talking to people.
Or was there another study? I'm doing a lot more legwork than this deserves, considering your unnecessary hostility toward me.
You can put lemon juice in your hair, and the sun will bleach it. By your definition, putting lemon in your tea is drinking bleach.
Technically, yes. Decent counter.
You're posting the horse paste submissions, aren't you?
btw... IT'S THE FLU and a worldwide propaganda campaign.
Nobody here is drinking bleach, retard.
I am not posting anything, no.
You are totally going to get COVID “vaccine” booster shots for the rest of your life, while continuing to whine that your vaccine addiction isn’t eradicating coronavirus because of the unvaccinated, lol
No, they are also calling ivermectin prescriptions risky because it is a horse dewormer
And bleach is understood by most to be a cleaner not formulated purely
so calling it bleach is inaccurate
Chlorine dioxide is the active ingredient in bleach
but bleach is not necessarily a pure formulation of chlorine dioxide
If you say so. I've publicly stated that if you're going to go the Ivermectin route, at least go through a doctor, get the appropriate dose, make sure that you aren't on any meds (like blood thinners) that can interact with the med, and know that the med you're prescribed is actually designed and tested in human beings.
Eating horse paste is like eating garbage off the street. Maybe you'll be okay. But since nobody expected you to eat street trash, nobody exactly knows for sure, because they don't know what's in that street trash nor how any of it will affect you.
I don't like eating mysteries, personally.
Ah yes, the ol' "asking the people who caused the problem to fix the problem" routine.
Well, they are the people who can get you the version of the medicine you want without risking taking stuff that has never been tested in humans and never intended for human consumption, yeah. I doubt your primary care doctor has much to do with any conspiracy.
If it was an option to get it through doctors we wouldn’t be using the animal version you fucking idiot
Rude.
Also, isn’t American Frontline Doctors supposed to be a resource for those of you who don’t trust the established medical system?