I’m in a war with a vax shaming Karen who thinks I am killing myself, my 15 year old boys, and the entire world by failing to get vaccinated. She doesn’t care that I’ve had covid and therefore carry natural antibodies. She screamed that I’m probably one of those people who will get covid and then turn to horse medicine to save myself and my boys.
So, I’m asking for your help to assemble a list of definitive sources that we can all use to battle this increasingly vicious attack on (1) unvaccinated people and (2) Ivermectin. With growing urgency, we need to all be ready to combat, with unimpeachable sources, the narrative that the stubborn and unvaccinated are the cause of all the variants, and that Ivermectin is dangerous.
Here’s what the MSM, CDC and FDA are saying about Ivermectin:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/26/health/ivermectin-covid-19-warning-injuries/index.html
Vax shamers point to this recent release by the CDC dissing ivermectin, but if you read the notice rather than the headline, it only says that some (undefined number) people are using the wrong dosage and/or using animal formulations; they are NOT saying it is unsafe in the proper dosage and form. They admit that there are some clinical studies underway. Still, folks are running with this to say it is dangerous. https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/pdf/CDC_HAN_449.pdf
The FDA recently tweeted, “You’re not a horse. You’re not a cow. Seriously y’all. Stop it.” https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1429050070243192839 and then they linked to their guidance that no one should use ivermectin for covid, but if you read the text after the headline, the text says ivermectin has been used safely for humans in proper dosages (as opposed to horse dosages, hello) for things like lice and parasites in humans … and that studies are underway for covid. But the headline misdirects by screaming that “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent covid.” https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
With regard to covid, the MSM, CDC, NIH and FDA are all ignoring that India has nearly stopped Delta in its tracks by going to ivermectin – safely dosed, of course – for humans. Since moving to Ivermectin rather than vaccines, Delhi has eradicated 97% of new cases. https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html
This is a good summary of how the medical establishment, US government and MSM have tried to quash the efficacy of Ivermectin: https://www.yourobserver.com/article/the-battle-for-ivermectin
As for natural immunity, a new Israeli study which is currently undergoing peer review says people with natural immunity from having had covid are 13 times more protected from a breakthrough infection than someone with two Pfizer shots https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1
All the studies related to Ivermectin: http://c19ivermectin.com/
As for vaccine, just tell her that you will take a vaccine only if:
It is necessary
It is effective
It is safe
These vaccines are none of them. Lets break it down:
Here is the simple prevention plan
Dr. Richard Fleming treated 8000 patients and came up with 3 protocols that worked across the board when used in conjuction:
However the studies from Israel and UK both show that vaccinated people are catching Covid (66% of delta variant patients were vaccinated in UK. I think it was 56% in Israel iirc)
New studies are showing that wild variants seem to become completely immune to vaccine
Dr Zelenko interview
Dr Richard Fleming event 2021 - MUST WATCH - please please watch this. Skip first 15 mins
Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccine technology This video is perfect to show your liberal friends because all three of them are liberals and pro-vaccines.
Cool 😎
I am proud to see "safe, effective, necessary - it must be all three" repeated in the wild. I have been touting those three tests for some years.
Necessary is the best test, because if you are not going to die from something then there is no need of a vaccine to begin with, and even if you could die, if you arent going to catch it, again no need.
This is the reasoning that helped me decide not to vaccinate my children, simple really, you just quarantine your child when young from dangerous disease. Are they really going to be exposed to polio at 6 months old? not a chance, so you do not need it to begin with.
These are the three tests which must be spread as far and wide. You cannot advocate a vaccine if it fails one of these tests, anyone who still does is operating outside of reason and logic. People should make their own assessment, of course.
But in this case it fails all three tests, and yet people somehow tie their brains in knots and take the vaccines anyway.
The initial "study" is meaningless anyway because halfway through, both Moderna and Pfizer gave most of their control groups the vaccines. So no blinding, no control group, and as I recall, their subjects weren't representative of a random sample, either. Why anyone would take them seriously is a wonder.
Yeah scientifically those studies are a total joke.
now i know why they didn't have a public comment period for the 'approval' they just did. I'm under the impression this is highly unusual way of business in the approval process. Usually there is a period for public comments for public to bring up any concerns. For the BioNTech there wasn't any.
Their trials wouldn't have passed muster in my graduate school. But by now they also can't afford public comment because now there is a big body of evidence against them. It was Moderna too. I haven't seen the prospectus for AZ or J&J, would be interesting to compare.
Please note that the claim of 95% effectiveness is deceptive as it is based on relative risk reduction when the appropriate measurement to use is absolute risk reduction.
The absolute risk reduction of this vaccine? Less than 1%.
https://rumble.com/vleq43-informed-consent-its-your-right.html
0.7% exactly. But its below margin of error so meaningless
And if you link to Dr. Robert Malone, make sure to mention he's never claimed to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines. He does have multiple patents that form the foundation of the technology which was used to create them, however.