I agree with the paper wholeheartedly. Vaccines are causing much more injury and death than the Wuhan virus is.
For example, if you are healthy and under 20 years old, your risk if you get infected with the Wuhan virus is 0.00004% or 1 in 2,500,000
However, the risk of a bad reaction from the vaccine is 0.2% or 1 in 500. Of those people that got the bad reaction, 2.64% will die. This is a 0.00528% risk or 1 in 19,000.
However, be forewarned that the corrupt criminal network has already identified the author of the above-mentioned paper as a anti-vax nutjob for an earlier paper claiming that the mRNA vaccines carry a risk of prion disease.
However, the risk of a bad reaction from the vaccine is 0.2% or 1 in 500. Of those people that got the bad reaction, 2.64% will die. This is a 0.00528% risk or 1 in 19,000.
I'm overweight and have an additional co-morbidity and im not in the young bracket. I did the Oxford absolute risk of covid for me and chance of death was 1 in 111,000. The risk of the vaccine killing me is 17x that. They can shove it.
There is overwhelming evidence of this, and absolutely no scientifically valid evidence which supports the narrative, but everyone just plays along anyway.
Mate, if you go look at the ONS stats for the UK. 1.5% or thereabouts of aggregate age grouped populace are currently infected. They spent all of last year saying how the R0 was 3-4-5-6 or whatever, presuming it takes 1 week to spread from host to host then something like 40% of the UK was infected inside 3 weeks sometime last year.
Even if the 1.5% held static week on week we've fucking ran out of people to infect by now, everyone is immune or dead already. Fucking sick of this shit man and the data just sits there right in front of everyone's faces regardless.
I know you're talking about something else but my point is closer to the noses of NPCs and they still can't deduce anything, fucking brainless cunts. Meanwhile they're writing policy guidance on "identifying at risk children who are aged 12-15" etc and there's been according to their own stats, like 2 hospitalisations per 100k and 0 deaths at all.
How can you fucking write about "identifying at risk children" when there's clearly no concept of "at risk children" that exists within the data.
Definitely belongs on the "red pill" list of evidence! I had no idea that the Pfizer reports of their outcomes for EUA were so inadequate. What was going on?
I agree with the paper wholeheartedly. Vaccines are causing much more injury and death than the Wuhan virus is.
For example, if you are healthy and under 20 years old, your risk if you get infected with the Wuhan virus is 0.00004% or 1 in 2,500,000
However, the risk of a bad reaction from the vaccine is 0.2% or 1 in 500. Of those people that got the bad reaction, 2.64% will die. This is a 0.00528% risk or 1 in 19,000.
However, be forewarned that the corrupt criminal network has already identified the author of the above-mentioned paper as a anti-vax nutjob for an earlier paper claiming that the mRNA vaccines carry a risk of prion disease.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Bart_Classen
The journal the paper is published in is an online-only journal.
https://www.gavinpublishers.com/journals/journals_details/current-trends-in-internal-medicine-issn-2638-003X
I believe the author of the paper is 100% correct, but expect the 'already debunked' criticism.
I'm overweight and have an additional co-morbidity and im not in the young bracket. I did the Oxford absolute risk of covid for me and chance of death was 1 in 111,000. The risk of the vaccine killing me is 17x that. They can shove it.
You scienced?? Just another reason for the cabal to hate you.
"if you are healthy and under 20 years old, your risk if you get infected with the Wuhan virus is 0.00004% or 1 in 2,500,000"
should be risk of death not infection
There is no contagious virus.
The human body doesn't make specific antibodies, so vaccines cannot make antibodies for any virus.
There is overwhelming evidence of this, and absolutely no scientifically valid evidence which supports the narrative, but everyone just plays along anyway.
Mate, if you go look at the ONS stats for the UK. 1.5% or thereabouts of aggregate age grouped populace are currently infected. They spent all of last year saying how the R0 was 3-4-5-6 or whatever, presuming it takes 1 week to spread from host to host then something like 40% of the UK was infected inside 3 weeks sometime last year.
Even if the 1.5% held static week on week we've fucking ran out of people to infect by now, everyone is immune or dead already. Fucking sick of this shit man and the data just sits there right in front of everyone's faces regardless.
I know you're talking about something else but my point is closer to the noses of NPCs and they still can't deduce anything, fucking brainless cunts. Meanwhile they're writing policy guidance on "identifying at risk children who are aged 12-15" etc and there's been according to their own stats, like 2 hospitalisations per 100k and 0 deaths at all.
How can you fucking write about "identifying at risk children" when there's clearly no concept of "at risk children" that exists within the data.
Once again
All arguments for immunization are purely philosophical and based on false, discredited assumptions.
Definitely belongs on the "red pill" list of evidence! I had no idea that the Pfizer reports of their outcomes for EUA were so inadequate. What was going on?
Here is something else to check out: Only COVID facts you need
Drip, drip, drip
A good study and info that.
Saving for later thanks