FDA's Two Most Senior Pro-Vaccine Leaders are Bailing Out - The Great Awakening

251

FDA's Two Most Senior Pro-Vaccine Leaders are Bailing Out (media.greatawakening.win) 🚔 Crime & Corruption 💸

posted 3 years ago by Mukzn 3 years ago by Mukzn +251 / -0

37 comments download

37 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (37)

sorted by:

▲ 15 ▼

– y000danon 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

This is a good sign.

The FDA did their approval schtick out of nowhere. Nothing changed. How much you wanna bet these people knew how false it with and have a humanity left within them?

Eyes on.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 12 ▼

– mitmont123 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

They'll still be made to pay

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 13 ▼

– y000danon 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Completely.

It's imperative that we hold anyone in the Biomedical Field more accountable - especially people at this tier.

Want to be freaked out? Draw a line between these individuals and the lobby for the Affordable Care Act of 2009.

A Timeline We Should Reflect On:

2001 ( Fall ) - a false Anthrax attack takes place that is used to rush through the Patriot Act after several Congressman refuse to sign it - it passes without even being reviewed ( much like the ACA )
2003 - 2005 - The Anthrax Attack is used t create a massive BioWeapons state. Insanely lucrative contracts are made, liabilities waived, and things like the fledgling Anthrax Vaccines ( that were being shown as unsafe at the time ) are suddenly a hot commodity - generating massive profits.
2008 - Bill Gates "retires" from Microsoft and begins BioMedical Monopolistic Practices
2009 - the ACA is passed. The Bill is written by Medical Insurance Providers, directly, and heavily is based on principles of "BioEthics" which is just NewSpeak for Eugenics.
2010 - 2016 - Fort Detrich sees massive security lapses.
2017 - The first Pandemic Response Drills begin. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=jicrcr
2018 - More drills
2019 - Event 201 and the release of SARS-COV-2 in Wuhan ~October 2019

When you step back and look at the progression - there was a massive consolidation of medical capacity for the 10 years running up to the COVID scenario.

That has every hallmark sign of being engineered.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– mac1221 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

According to the article:

A former senior FDA leader told Endpoints that they’re departing because they’re frustrated that CDC and their ACIP committee are involved in decisions that they think should be up to the FDA. The former FDAer also said he’s heard they’re upset with CBER director Peter Marks for not insisting that those decisions should be kept inside FDA. What finally did it for them was the White House getting ahead of FDA on booster shots.

BREAKING: In a major blow to vaccine efforts, senior FDA leaders stepping down

Like many departments within the Federal government, battle lines are being drawn. Those that are on the fence are being pushed to one side or the other. Internal division all over DC.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– y000danon 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Excellent post: I admit I didn’t read. Shame.

Speculatively - what I foresaw was true - but I was sloppy.

If they were truly pushing back - would they not need to make public statements or more? I mean if you are exiting make a splash. Don’t half ass. Makes me believe the story less though these swamp people act in ways I don’t grasp

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– mac1221 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

It is easy for people far removed from the situation to speculate on what someone should or should not do based on the limited information available. People like this dept director and deputy director are somewhat in the belly of the beast. The game is dangerous and let's be clear, there is no protection for whistleblowers. They know all too well what can happen to anyone that speaks out. A whistleblower or someone they care about ends up in a house fire, a flaming car accident, or suicided out of a 10 story building or bullet to the head for daring to speak out against the drug cabal. The body count list for such brave individuals that dared to confront big pharma and the globalist agenda is a long one. This crowd has managed to get to individuals with the financial means to buy all kinds of private security. How much protection are these two people going to have - or any other government worker for that matter?

Given the timing of all this, I wonder if they may have actually been forced to resign. There is a house cleaning taking place all over DC that involves grey hats. Those not completely onboard with the program are being purged. No one in any kind of power position is not going to be allowed to just keep their heads down and go along to get along. Recent events are forcing them off the fence. If that is the case, it does give me some hope that there may still be some good people within governmental ranks. If the opposite is true, and they have been given a golden parachute for ramming this license application through, it is not a surprise. If they were being forced out, as much as I would like for them to come forward with the truthful reasons why they are leaving, I do not hold anything against those that don't. For them, it may be a bridge too far.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– y000danon 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Interesting. I wish we had more visibility into this.

If one of these folks goes on record that would be a big deal.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 2 ▼

– Tree_Frog 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I think you're correct about the "house cleaning." It looks like Gruber may have been taken off the "sprint" to get Pfizer approved back in July:

https://www.statnews.com/2021/07/30/fda-under-pressure-plans-sprint-to-accelerate-review-of-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-for-full-approval/

The process requires FDA staff to review millions of pages of complex data, conduct plant inspections, and negotiate with Pfizer over issues including the terms of the FDA’s approved label and the company’s postmarketing responsibilities. Now, the senior agency official said, the agency will initiate a “sprint.”

Under the FDA’s new plan, the director of FDA’s biologics center, Peter Marks, will largely oversee review of the Pfizer application, taking over for Marion Gruber, a 32-year veteran of the FDA who currently heads the office of vaccine research and review within the larger biologics center, according to a second FDA source. A third source familiar with the plan, who like the others spoke on condition of anonymity, said Marks was heavily involved in the review, but did not comment on whether he was formally replacing Gruber in the agency’s chain of command.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0