I do not think Hitler was a good guy, but the amount of evidence of fuckery surrounding WWII is overwhelming. If someone posts evidence of something having to do with Hitler and it makes him look like not the worst person who ever existed then debate the evidence with more evidence, don't call the person a shill or name it "cointelpro" just because you don't want to debate the evidence.
The whole world is a fuckery playground, with controlled opposition and disinformation all over the place. We win by using critical thinking, discernment, and finding and presenting evidence. We lose by ignoring evidence or removing evidence we don't want to look at.
Censorship is never the answer to honest investigation or debate. Let's not ask for more of it.
Germany was allowed to succeed by separating from their banks.
All to set the stage for war.
War broke out, after he annexed Austria and took Poland.
Then he turned on them.
He openly and fragrantly used their best techniques for control against them. He fought fire with fire.
He wanted to be the top of the pyramid.
WW2 was a staging platform to take over the Vatican Jesuits completely, among other fledgling Secret Society spy organizations, and as an excuse to form an International Coalition of Nations (UN) which would serve to further grease the gears on the NWO plan and turn the USA into its de-facto world police.
Hitler took it too far when he went after their darling dystopia and slave state, the Soviet Union.
Hitler was a puppet who tried to cut his strings and then, instead of turning to God, he used the strings to strangle those who controlled him so he could rule the world instead.
You can't fight evil with evil.
It's a simple case of a Civil War between Secret Society heads.
The fallout since then has simply been the victors writing the history.
Do you have a write up of this? I'm writing up a report on the banking system (Fed specifically, but also world wide). I'm especially interested in any evidence you have to support banking fuckery with Germany (or any other country during this time period really). Bonus points if it is primary source evidence surrounding interactions with either the Fed, Bank of England, Vatican (bank) or the Bank of International Settlements.
Although, it is relatively common knowledge that Hitler set up his own banking system separate from what was already established in other places in Europe at the time.
He had to do this because the German currency had imploded after WW1. Really, even with the rewrites to history, I'm pretty certain this point is fact.
I found a site on my other computer that I bookmarked that has authentic speeches from Hitler about the Jews.
You'll find his main point of contention wasn't their religion, but rather their monetary lending practices (banking).
Although, if the plan by the Cabal was to victimize Jews so they could always play the helpless damsel in distress from then on, thereby becoming immune to all criticism, then it's likely he did only what the Cabal told him to in order to become Chancellor.
By saying your plans out loud, but framing it as hyperbolic fantasy and rhetoric, you can trick people into just ignoring your plans when you actually implement them.
People will say "Pft! That's just a movie plot, not real life."
This site has some good excerpts, very hard to find elsewhere.
Don't blame me if you find yourself going "Huh... Hitler was based?"
The master-stroke of the Jew was to claim the leadership of the fourth estate [press]. He founded the Movement both of the Social Democrats and the Communists. His policy was twofold: he had his ‘apostles’ in both political camps. Amongst the parties of the Right, he encouraged those features which were most repugnant to the people – the passion for money, unscrupulous methods in trade which were employed so ruthlessly as to give rise to the proverb ‘Business, too, marches over corpses.’ And the Jew attacked the parties of the Right. Jews wormed their way into the families of the upper classes: it was from the Jews that the latter took their wives. The result was that in a short time it was precisely the ruling class which became in its character completely estranged from its own people.
Like I said though. He cut his strings and then tried to strangle his old taskmasters with them, whilst also using the same tools they taught him against his own people.
I recently started watching Europa: The last battle series. It definitely paints Hitler and the Nazis as the good guys. That being said, it's the only time I've heard that side of the story( History was never my best subject). I am doing my best to further my research in the subject to help understand the world we live in today. Before watching some of that series, I never knew how bad the Bolsheviks were, or the tactics they used are what we are seeing today. Essentially the Marxist playbook. Again, this is what I have gathered from that series so curious to see what some more enlightened history buffs have to say about it. Basically they said that Hitler was trying to prevent what happened in Russia, in Germany. I think that's where the Hitler and Nazis being the good guys is coming from. Everyone here is anti commie.
I'm not pro Hitler or pro Nazi by any means but I think there is more to the story that isn't taught in the history books.
I also find your post ironic because this is just about the only site that you can speak freely about the Jewish communist without getting shilled out of town. Try posting this post on Patriots but replace Nazis with Jews.
Hitler was a marxist and a socialist. Our enemy. The left has pushen him into the right like a hot potato. Ask them and they can’t explain why he would be not only on the right, but the extreme right. Then ask them why Stalin, a communist on the extrem left would start an alliance with Hitler if he was his polar opposite.
Sure Hitler disliked other leftist, like the Bolsheviks, but when has the left ever stayed friends for long among the different views on socialism?
I do not think Hitler was a good guy, but the amount of evidence of fuckery surrounding WWII is overwhelming. If someone posts evidence of something having to do with Hitler and it makes him look like not the worst person who ever existed then debate the evidence with more evidence, don't call the person a shill or name it "cointelpro" just because you don't want to debate the evidence.
The whole world is a fuckery playground, with controlled opposition and disinformation all over the place. We win by using critical thinking, discernment, and finding and presenting evidence. We lose by ignoring evidence or removing evidence we don't want to look at.
Censorship is never the answer to honest investigation or debate. Let's not ask for more of it.
Exactly!! God Bless!!!
Here's where my research has taken me:
Hitler was one of them.
He was put in place by them.
He did everything they wanted.
Germany was allowed to succeed by separating from their banks.
All to set the stage for war.
War broke out, after he annexed Austria and took Poland.
Then he turned on them.
He openly and fragrantly used their best techniques for control against them. He fought fire with fire.
He wanted to be the top of the pyramid.
WW2 was a staging platform to take over the Vatican Jesuits completely, among other fledgling Secret Society spy organizations, and as an excuse to form an International Coalition of Nations (UN) which would serve to further grease the gears on the NWO plan and turn the USA into its de-facto world police.
Hitler took it too far when he went after their darling dystopia and slave state, the Soviet Union.
Hitler was a puppet who tried to cut his strings and then, instead of turning to God, he used the strings to strangle those who controlled him so he could rule the world instead.
You can't fight evil with evil.
It's a simple case of a Civil War between Secret Society heads.
The fallout since then has simply been the victors writing the history.
Neither side were the "good guys."
It's even arguable if we were the good guys.
Do you have a write up of this? I'm writing up a report on the banking system (Fed specifically, but also world wide). I'm especially interested in any evidence you have to support banking fuckery with Germany (or any other country during this time period really). Bonus points if it is primary source evidence surrounding interactions with either the Fed, Bank of England, Vatican (bank) or the Bank of International Settlements.
I don't have any sources on hand at the moment.
Although, it is relatively common knowledge that Hitler set up his own banking system separate from what was already established in other places in Europe at the time.
He had to do this because the German currency had imploded after WW1. Really, even with the rewrites to history, I'm pretty certain this point is fact.
I found a site on my other computer that I bookmarked that has authentic speeches from Hitler about the Jews.
You'll find his main point of contention wasn't their religion, but rather their monetary lending practices (banking).
Although, if the plan by the Cabal was to victimize Jews so they could always play the helpless damsel in distress from then on, thereby becoming immune to all criticism, then it's likely he did only what the Cabal told him to in order to become Chancellor.
By saying your plans out loud, but framing it as hyperbolic fantasy and rhetoric, you can trick people into just ignoring your plans when you actually implement them.
People will say "Pft! That's just a movie plot, not real life."
It's called Predictive Programming.
https://alphahistory.com/holocaust/hitler-on-the-jews-1922/
This site has some good excerpts, very hard to find elsewhere.
Don't blame me if you find yourself going "Huh... Hitler was based?"
Like I said though. He cut his strings and then tried to strangle his old taskmasters with them, whilst also using the same tools they taught him against his own people.
You can't fight evil with evil.
Thank you.
I was kinda leaning that direction based on other evidence.
Well you can. It just doesn't seem to work out well...
For anyone.
Actually that sounds like a tactic the left would use.
you mean shitler? I haven't noticed except a few handshakes that get deported
I haven't either.
Oh, I’ve encountered them. Know exactly what he’s saying
I've seen them too but they tend to be squashed quickly.
I recently started watching Europa: The last battle series. It definitely paints Hitler and the Nazis as the good guys. That being said, it's the only time I've heard that side of the story( History was never my best subject). I am doing my best to further my research in the subject to help understand the world we live in today. Before watching some of that series, I never knew how bad the Bolsheviks were, or the tactics they used are what we are seeing today. Essentially the Marxist playbook. Again, this is what I have gathered from that series so curious to see what some more enlightened history buffs have to say about it. Basically they said that Hitler was trying to prevent what happened in Russia, in Germany. I think that's where the Hitler and Nazis being the good guys is coming from. Everyone here is anti commie.
I'm not pro Hitler or pro Nazi by any means but I think there is more to the story that isn't taught in the history books.
I also find your post ironic because this is just about the only site that you can speak freely about the Jewish communist without getting shilled out of town. Try posting this post on Patriots but replace Nazis with Jews.
Hitler was a marxist and a socialist. Our enemy. The left has pushen him into the right like a hot potato. Ask them and they can’t explain why he would be not only on the right, but the extreme right. Then ask them why Stalin, a communist on the extrem left would start an alliance with Hitler if he was his polar opposite.
Sure Hitler disliked other leftist, like the Bolsheviks, but when has the left ever stayed friends for long among the different views on socialism?
Idk. I have never seen a single Hitler supporting post on GAW. I can’t recall seeing any posts about Hitler at all. Sounds like a false flag. Z