When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on August 23 that it had fully approved the first Comirnaty-branded Covid vaccine, the mainstream media immediately began reporting the events. Joe Biden jumped in front of a microphone and told businesses that they should "step up" the mandatory administration of vaccines for their employees.
Dr. Anthony Fauci told the national media that he expects a number of new "mandates" to result from the approval of the Pfizer vaccine.
There is only one problem. The FDA has "approved" the wrong Pfizer vaccine currently available on the U.S. market.
Some people have looked under the facade and checked the facts of what the FDA was really doing, not what the media and Joe Biden's administration were saying.
On August 27, Liberty Counsel of Orlando, Florida, perhaps the most respected Christian law firm in the country, issued a press release, confirming the deception.
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made the bait and switch, announcing that it had approved its "first vaccine against COVID-19" in order to advance "vaccine" claims and protect the pharmaceutical company Pfizer from legal liability. However, there is currently no fully licensed vaccine against COVID on the U.S. market. While this is confusing, and probably intentional, it sums up the current status of Pfizer-BioNTech injections:
All of Pfizer's existing vials (hundreds of millions) remain under federal emergency use authorization (EUA) (which means that people have "the option to take them or leave them");
Pfizer's third or "booster" shot is identical to the one above and remains under the EUA with limited use for certain categories of people;
BioNTech has received FDA approval for people 16 and older under the name Comirnaty, but there are no available doses of Comirnaty in the United States;
In other words, there is currently NO FDA-approved COVID-19 injection in the United States. All COVID injections in America are covered under the EUA, and thus people have a "choice to accept or reject" them;
Even when COVID vaccinations approved by the Food and Drug Administration become available, people are protected by federal and many state laws from being forced to get these vaccinations based on their sincere religious beliefs or rights of conscience."
They left out the most important detail.
The Emergency Use Authorization comes with legal immunity for Pfizer. So if your child drops dead immediately after getting the jab, all you get is sympathy and Pfizer carries on with the death machine.
The ghost product Comirnaty, has legal liability. Which is why Pfizer will never manufacture any under that brand name for the US. It is also why the FDA felt it could bypass all the normal requirements for approval. The FDA knows that nobody in the USA will ever get the Comirnaty shot, and therefore nobody can go after the FDA for rubberstamping it without normal testing.
The people we really need on our side in order to stand up to the FDA are the medical doctors and the scientists. Unfortunately, they are 95% on the side of the corrupt psychopaths.
Doctors stonewalled access to the field with absurd licensing restrictions like expensive school and years of free labor (residency) so they could theoretically make tons of money. Neoliberals sabotaged them by letting in pajeets with half the training work as doctors. But wait! They can still line their pockets by accepting pharma bribes!
Greedy fucks.
No shit. FDA (FUCKING DIE, AMERICA!) can approve anything they want; that can never and will never remove an American's right to reject and refuse it. Period.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFUOpSaf/373-fdaapproved-drugs-have-been-/c/
It's for the normies. You think they understand any of what you just said?
Yep, the clot shot not being FDA approved and Ivermectin and HCQ being FDA approved was never the main argument for or against them, just the cherry on top that even one of the sources that the normies and doctors worship confirms what we've been saying.
True but it's more of a significant talking point we will have to learn to combat.
(Think you meant 'has legal liability.')
What makes you think they would be held liability for any of these vaccines? In 1986, Congress removed liability for vaccines that are FDA approved. You have to go through arbitration, and almost nobody wins......even for the most serious cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act
This does not hold true if it is ever shown that a pharmaceutical company acted with willful intent to harm or deceive the public.
FDA approval can be rescinded and this would kill the product. But if the product is never distributed, no injuries can be proven and it's FDA status will never be threatened.
My point is that even when everything is FDA approved, they will still NOT be liable.
Not directly, but there are still consequences. If a drug gets FDA rescinded, people will become more suspicious of the company and the FDA.
That is a very critical observation.
If this does not show intent to harm, I don't know what else would.
They literally just changed the name, got that "name" approved by the FDA, MSM then shouts from the roof "its approved" more sheep come running for slaughter. The rest is history.