My daughter works for a religious system here, and they've also denied religious exemptions. Their reason is that there is an option that does not contain the aborted fetal cell line. I have read two differing views on that so I don't know if that's a valid reason.
They are playing a semantic game. It does not CONTAIN fetal cell lines, but it was tested on the aborted fetal cells and developed using them. Same thing, in a religious exemption, because it is an objection against abortion.
Your first link has many inconsistencies and references things that don't exist (like where it says, "below you'll find").
Your second article is only in relation to the J&J so I didn't want to give MSN a click.
Your third article explicitly says that Madurna and Pfizer's, "vaccines" do not contain fetal material. It also states that the J&J only uses fetal cell linings, not fetal cells themselves (not a significant enough distinction to me but my point is, facts matter).
Unless I'm missing something, both of your claims are wrong as currently presented, by your own sources. I'd like to be proven wrong on this, but I don't think I'm going to be.
That's why I wouldn't use that argument though it's valid. They always seem to come up with a reason but they won't always tell you why, at least where I work. They've also made finding out who the specific people are who make these decisions, very difficult. No names just some damn God-complex committee.
My daughter works for a religious system here, and they've also denied religious exemptions. Their reason is that there is an option that does not contain the aborted fetal cell line. I have read two differing views on that so I don't know if that's a valid reason.
Phizer makes it with the fetal cell lines but strips it out for final product.
Ethically on religeous grounds it should not be injected into GOD's temple.
They are playing a semantic game. It does not CONTAIN fetal cell lines, but it was tested on the aborted fetal cells and developed using them. Same thing, in a religious exemption, because it is an objection against abortion.
Afaik, they all used aborted fetal lines. At least in testing. J&J uses it in manufacturing process from what I recall.
The J&J shot uses fetal cells (as do all flu shots) in the end product
The mRNA shots do not have fetal cells in them, however they use the fetal cell lines to produce it.
Thus ALL of them use fetal cells.
Could you provide some sources for these claims? I'd love to add that to my catalogs.
Flu vaccines: https://www.cga.ct.gov/2020/PHdata/Tmy/2020HB-05044-R000219-Wrinn%2015,%20Chris-TMY.PDF
J&J vaccine: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/fetal-cell-lines-were-used-to-make-the-johnson-and-johnson-covid-vaccine%E2%80%94heres-what-that-means/ar-BB1efi8p
mRNA shots: https://www.health.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/COVID%20Vaccine%20Page/COVID-19_Vaccine_Fetal_Cell_Handout.pdf
Your first link has many inconsistencies and references things that don't exist (like where it says, "below you'll find").
Your second article is only in relation to the J&J so I didn't want to give MSN a click.
Your third article explicitly says that Madurna and Pfizer's, "vaccines" do not contain fetal material. It also states that the J&J only uses fetal cell linings, not fetal cells themselves (not a significant enough distinction to me but my point is, facts matter).
Unless I'm missing something, both of your claims are wrong as currently presented, by your own sources. I'd like to be proven wrong on this, but I don't think I'm going to be.
Can we please not spread mis-information?
That's why I wouldn't use that argument though it's valid. They always seem to come up with a reason but they won't always tell you why, at least where I work. They've also made finding out who the specific people are who make these decisions, very difficult. No names just some damn God-complex committee.
Plus, if you go in to get the jab, do they give you a choice of which one? Not that I'm getting one, regardless.
Yes, you can choose if you go somewhere that offers them all.
I choose to not take it.