3 years ago I had a basal cell carcinoma removed from the left side of my face. It was traumatic. About 6 months ago I noticed an identical, scaly little growth on the right side. Same position and everything. I haven’t gotten it checked out because I really don’t want another hole in my face. Not in denial, just more like avoidance of reality.
Last week I took the horse paste prophylactically. No side effects, no worms that I could see.
Tonight, though, I noticed that the scaly spot on my right cheek is completely gone. Is it even possible that the ivermectin could have reversed the skin cancer? And so quickly (6 days)? I don’t know what to think here. Has anyone had a similar experience?
To me this makes 100% sense. They have come out against ivermectin so rabidly that since we know (they hate us and want us dead) ivermectin could very well be a miracle drug that they have secretly kept from us. Secretly meaning..... Telling people it was merely for scabies or worms. Meanwhile....the cancer industry is poisoning and killing people for millions of dollars every year. I believe you. I think they LIE any chance they get.
There was a time that I would have been skeptical of such a notion.. 'are they really THAT evil?' and so on.
Not anymore. The $ in the corona response have been overwhelmingly exploited by crime groups who write a 'murder right' in their contracts to distribute these RNA gene maiming substances.. To contrast, what is the yearly spend on all cancer oncology treatment and drugs? Probably at least as much and maybe much more, given the prevalence of cancer, and people willing to shell out all they have to extend what time they have. So thats an even bigger carrot waved in front of bad people to lunge at.
Bottom line, a cancer cure (or even an effective therapy) will likely be the most violently suppressed medical breakthrough in all human history.
Agreed. What if my first experience wasn’t even really cancer? Makes me mad, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
The fact that the medical profession, for the most part, is so anti-ivermectin is what spurred me to start stocking up on it a few months ago. As a nurse I've seen some pretty bad medicine, mostly the huge amounts of meds the elderly take daily. I believe half the people in nursing homes would not be there if they weren't on about 20 different meds. I haven't worked in over two years because I wanted to spend time with my youngest (and probably last) grandchild. I won't take the fake vaxx, so looks like I'll be out of work a bit longer.
A cheap cure for cancer is industry disruptive and that's the bottom line.
I thought this was interesting until the last paragraph:
“I get that people are scared, I get that people are worried,” said Alozie. “But it puzzles me that people would use something with such little data compared to something that has such great data and we know works.”
That last sentence is...well, less than truthful. Such little data? and... Such great data and we know works? This is “spin” at best, dishonesty at worst.
Nice try handshake
Oh they are reaching far now 👀 the covid shot is much much much worse. Ivermectin is even safe when you are breastfeeding a baby. Hardly any side effects
Nigeria? No actual named or published data? No journal? Just an article throwing out words about universities in Nigeria.
Ivermectin isn't new. Been around a long long time.
FYI : The article mentioned above has now been retracted. Here is what it says at the top of the page:
Editor’s note: Following audience concerns over the efficacy and accuracy of the scientific methods used in the ivermectin study performed in Nigeria in 2011, the original publishing station, KTSM, issued the following correction:
FOR THE RECORD: A national story regarding Ivermectin and a study regarding its effect on men’s reproductive health that KTSM published, has been removed from our website.
Concerns over the scientific research methods, the veracity of the original, peer-reviewed report and public statements by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) saying that infertility is not a known side effect of Ivermectin all led to our editorial decision to remove the story.
Link: https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/ivermectin-causes-sterilization-in-85-percent-of-men-study-finds/
^ Found the big pharma shill
Susy baka
This is BS. I haven't noticed Africa or the Middle East, where Ivermectin is taken prophylactically, having any problems keeping high birth rates.
What other drugs, therapies, etc were those Nigerians given along side Ivermectin? And why only limit the study to 385 men? That is a very small sub section of people. There are a whole host of other "treatments" that cause the same sperm issues. Couple that with Bill Gates's comments and methods of vaccinating the African Continent to control population and we now have another issue with this "study."
There are so many questionable parts in this article. For example:
“85 percent of all male patients treated in a particular center with ivermectin in the recent past who went to the laboratory for routine tests were discovered to have developed various forms, grades and degrees of sperm dysfunction.”
Treated in a “particular center”??? That’s weird. Need more info. What if the “particular center” was an infertility clinic? Or a nursing home? The article seems purposely vague here.