this has a long history - 4 years now perhaps? Wasnt there a law 'pede that pointed out changes in the Pacer reporting system that implied this were mundane artifacts of the normal course of business? I don't recall the details.
At any rate, it was also pointed out that if these were real, there also might be multiple indictments for each individual.
There can also be more than one name contained in a sealed indictment - so the actual number of persons involved might be significantly higher.
Began tracking them in 2018. Watched the numbers go up to 40,000 with Sessions and Huber. Everyone was astonished at such a high number. It had never been seen before.
Someone else noticed if you click on county at the bottom of the page....and then scroll past the southern border counties - interesting numbers pop up.
At some point the number becomes totally meaningless, and we have reached that point now.
Whether it's 100,000 or 105,344,254,678,390 sealed indictments, there's no way to realistically process and prosecute all those. So my guess is they skim off the top few, deal with those (sort of...maybe some fines and probation), and sweep the rest under the rug.
Hope I'm wrong but I'm hanging no hat on any sealed indictment.
Right? I don't even get how anyone could have read the Q posts and not know that these are largely going to be run through a military court system.
We even have expansions to the number of military courts announced this week by Catherine Herridge for CBS - hanging out at Gitmo and reporting on it. Pretty big news, but the meaning and magnitude of that info doesn't seem to be percolating properly.
If waiting an "extra" two months has yielded 19,343 more criminal indictments that come to fruition, I'm cool with that.
Select "County" and then look at the southern border.
Interesting!
Time to UNSEAL these indictments.
this has a long history - 4 years now perhaps? Wasnt there a law 'pede that pointed out changes in the Pacer reporting system that implied this were mundane artifacts of the normal course of business? I don't recall the details.
At any rate, it was also pointed out that if these were real, there also might be multiple indictments for each individual.
There can also be more than one name contained in a sealed indictment - so the actual number of persons involved might be significantly higher.
Began tracking them in 2018. Watched the numbers go up to 40,000 with Sessions and Huber. Everyone was astonished at such a high number. It had never been seen before.
Someone else noticed if you click on county at the bottom of the page....and then scroll past the southern border counties - interesting numbers pop up.
Where is that bad-ass dude with the balding head, big mustache, and stern glower, anyway?
As Gen Flynn did say, you never tell the enemy what your plan is. No leaks.
I want scalps and i want them now
Or all of us
At some point the number becomes totally meaningless, and we have reached that point now.
Whether it's 100,000 or 105,344,254,678,390 sealed indictments, there's no way to realistically process and prosecute all those. So my guess is they skim off the top few, deal with those (sort of...maybe some fines and probation), and sweep the rest under the rug.
Hope I'm wrong but I'm hanging no hat on any sealed indictment.
This is a Q research board. Q told us to track these for a reason.
"This is a Q research board." should be perma stickied
Should be a Q post of the day right along with the Bible verse of the day.
Right? I don't even get how anyone could have read the Q posts and not know that these are largely going to be run through a military court system.
We even have expansions to the number of military courts announced this week by Catherine Herridge for CBS - hanging out at Gitmo and reporting on it. Pretty big news, but the meaning and magnitude of that info doesn't seem to be percolating properly.
agreed, we're having to pull it out of each other