I knew the second the first tower fell that it was a demolition. If steel had actually melted like they say.the tops of those building should've leaned over before it free fell.that didn't happen.
you're 100% correct! yes some of the columns may have seen some heat, but not nearly enough to buckle... even if they did.. 70-80% of the columns would have seen minimal to no heat.... only a total loon would expect a total 100% even collapse of all those massive steel columns. sadly, most sheep are so blinded by the msm bullshit that they can no longer engage their brains and think for themselves.
There is also this thing called free fall. Those towers fell in its own footprint at free fall speed. Impossible unless demoed. Not to mention the molten steel that was around for weeks. Nano thermite is what scorched the towers with assistance from demolition and caused most of that steel to just dustify.
You're correct from Nano thermite molten steel was seen flowing at ground zero for at least a.week. Ive dug down this rabbit hole so far, I made it all the way to China.
How many ways can false statements be made? Let me count the ways ...
If softened under heat, which is a WELL KNOWN property of steel.
One of the MAIN REASONS they use steel in SKYSCRAPERS is because it TRANSFERS HEAT throughout the structure. If you have a 6" bar of steel, sure it could melt. But a 100+ story steel-framed building allows for A LOT of transfer of heat.
Steel loses something like 60% of rigidity at 1/2 its melting point.
No such building has EVER fallen due to heat/fire, except for 3 on 9/11 (which were blown apart). You canNOT reconcile your theory with the FACT that NO STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING HAS EVER FALLEN DUE TO "MELTING POINT."
Period.
Modern buildings are VERY much like a card towers too.
Bullshit.
They don't fall.
Period.
The downside is if you can make one major part fail, the whole building collapses because of the Cascade Effect.
More bullshit.
They don't fall.
(Except via explosives/incendiaries.)
Period.
However this also doesn't change truth that The Bush Administration planned 9-11 and it absolutely was an inside job.
Most likely, Bush himself was just told to go along. He's not smart enough to plan a cookout, much less a sophisiticated psyop like 9/11.
Tell me, lets get out Occam's razor.
Yes, let's do that.
Which is more plausible? That a MASSIVE team of government insiders all organized a huge conspiracy of thousands of people to rig the buildings, set up fake crisis actors....etc on and on and until you have somehow 100,000 people "in" on the crime of the century but somehow nobody talks?
That is a STRAWMAN argument, which is to say it has NOTHING to do with Occam's Razor.
Nobody is saying there were 100,000 people plotting anything.
Occam's Razor requires we look at ALL the known evidence, and THEN consider a simple explanation that INCLUDES ALL THE KNOWN EVIDENCE.
The FACT that there was a "re-cabling" in the twin towers just a few weeks before 9/11, where workers were in the elevator shafts of the buildings and occupants in the towers were forced to stay away from their offices for several days at a time is KNOWN because of eye witness testimony.
It is a FACT that Marvin Bush was head of the "security" company for both the twin towers AND Boston Logan airport, and only left the company shortly before the event.
A team of less than a dozen people could have easily planted devices inside the buildings (all 3 of them), and a handful of well-placed security people heading the important points of failure explains the fall of the buildings.
Those who planted the devices could have easily been killed shortly thereafter -- like the Seth Rich situation, or Seal Team 6.
No need for 500, much less 100,000.
Don't try to push ridiculous false claims past us.
Preset bombs and termite charges to cut steel beams. Multiple levels of culprits with compartmentalized knowledge of anyone else's involvement. It was not Osama who orchestrated it or even involved. He was just the scapegoat to start the war. Do you not remember how bad cell service was in 2001, you think he had good service on caves in Afghanistan?
Culprits like Bush, Silverstein, those who traded the Airline stocks, etc knew their part to do and did not know the extent of the entire crime. But their compartmentalized part kept them guilty and quiet
Not to mention the fact William Cooper predicted the attack in July based on comms hidden in plain sight in the media and was then assassinated later on that year.
Alex Jones stole Cooper's predictions and passed them off as his own without giving the man the credit he deserved.
Watch 'A' video? I've watched hundreds of videos, various angles, anything and everything there is and it was demoed using nano thermite, explosives and misses and definitely not planes. Also was said they took the passengers to a hanger, gave them scripts and then gassed them.
So you are telling me that no high rise building as ever fallen from fires, but that day 3 fell exactly the same way? You really believe they fell from fires and pancaked all the way down?
What about the countless police and firefighters who claimed bombs went off?
I knew the second the first tower fell that it was a demolition. If steel had actually melted like they say.the tops of those building should've leaned over before it free fell.that didn't happen.
you're 100% correct! yes some of the columns may have seen some heat, but not nearly enough to buckle... even if they did.. 70-80% of the columns would have seen minimal to no heat.... only a total loon would expect a total 100% even collapse of all those massive steel columns. sadly, most sheep are so blinded by the msm bullshit that they can no longer engage their brains and think for themselves.
There is also this thing called free fall. Those towers fell in its own footprint at free fall speed. Impossible unless demoed. Not to mention the molten steel that was around for weeks. Nano thermite is what scorched the towers with assistance from demolition and caused most of that steel to just dustify.
lol
ACTUAL MOLTEN METAL FLOWING FROM SOUTH TOWER
Literally burning and smouldering for months after. But sure it didn't melt the steel lmao.
temps up to 1400 degrees persisted for 4-5 months
http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/347-high-temperatures-persistent-heat-a-molten-steel-at-wtc-site-challenge-official-story.html
You're correct from Nano thermite molten steel was seen flowing at ground zero for at least a.week. Ive dug down this rabbit hole so far, I made it all the way to China.
IIRC that's where they shipped the debris...
Excellent find!
How many ways can false statements be made? Let me count the ways ...
One of the MAIN REASONS they use steel in SKYSCRAPERS is because it TRANSFERS HEAT throughout the structure. If you have a 6" bar of steel, sure it could melt. But a 100+ story steel-framed building allows for A LOT of transfer of heat.
No such building has EVER fallen due to heat/fire, except for 3 on 9/11 (which were blown apart). You canNOT reconcile your theory with the FACT that NO STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING HAS EVER FALLEN DUE TO "MELTING POINT."
Period.
Bullshit.
They don't fall.
Period.
More bullshit.
They don't fall.
(Except via explosives/incendiaries.)
Period.
Most likely, Bush himself was just told to go along. He's not smart enough to plan a cookout, much less a sophisiticated psyop like 9/11.
Yes, let's do that.
That is a STRAWMAN argument, which is to say it has NOTHING to do with Occam's Razor.
Nobody is saying there were 100,000 people plotting anything.
Occam's Razor requires we look at ALL the known evidence, and THEN consider a simple explanation that INCLUDES ALL THE KNOWN EVIDENCE.
The FACT that there was a "re-cabling" in the twin towers just a few weeks before 9/11, where workers were in the elevator shafts of the buildings and occupants in the towers were forced to stay away from their offices for several days at a time is KNOWN because of eye witness testimony.
It is a FACT that Marvin Bush was head of the "security" company for both the twin towers AND Boston Logan airport, and only left the company shortly before the event.
A team of less than a dozen people could have easily planted devices inside the buildings (all 3 of them), and a handful of well-placed security people heading the important points of failure explains the fall of the buildings.
Those who planted the devices could have easily been killed shortly thereafter -- like the Seth Rich situation, or Seal Team 6.
No need for 500, much less 100,000.
Don't try to push ridiculous false claims past us.
We've been researching this thing far too long.
Preset bombs and termite charges to cut steel beams. Multiple levels of culprits with compartmentalized knowledge of anyone else's involvement. It was not Osama who orchestrated it or even involved. He was just the scapegoat to start the war. Do you not remember how bad cell service was in 2001, you think he had good service on caves in Afghanistan? Culprits like Bush, Silverstein, those who traded the Airline stocks, etc knew their part to do and did not know the extent of the entire crime. But their compartmentalized part kept them guilty and quiet
Not to mention the fact William Cooper predicted the attack in July based on comms hidden in plain sight in the media and was then assassinated later on that year.
Alex Jones stole Cooper's predictions and passed them off as his own without giving the man the credit he deserved.
BOOM!
Another Shill falling in on himself....
<see what I did there?>
Now do building 7.
Watch 'A' video? I've watched hundreds of videos, various angles, anything and everything there is and it was demoed using nano thermite, explosives and misses and definitely not planes. Also was said they took the passengers to a hanger, gave them scripts and then gassed them.
You know how many video's I've watched of that controlled demolition with the initial detonation taking out the top part of the building??
Hundreds...
So you are telling me that no high rise building as ever fallen from fires, but that day 3 fell exactly the same way? You really believe they fell from fires and pancaked all the way down? What about the countless police and firefighters who claimed bombs went off?
Only because you ignore all the videos that DO show these things.
BTW, I hope you're not dumb enough to think that we should expect to hear things from cameras that had only video and no audio.
There were eyewitness firemen who were at the scene and reported both seeing AND HEARING the flashes and the bangs.