Please elaborate? Not reactionary doubt, but curious.
I mean, nukes are real, or what was done with all the testing and all? WW2 as well?
And to world trade; is that just in the sense that if suitcase nukes were an option there would not be the trust to have people travel easily because they might set off a nuke on arrival?
I don't think nukes are real at all. They were used to scare the population. Hiding under desks now from school shooters was hiding under desks from nuclear attack a few decades ago. Same tactic, different era. Both driven by lies from the government.
Nuclear stuff in pop culture or news is a way to send secret messages about dangerous information. For instance, when a guy wanted to go dive to visit the wreck of the titanic, the Navy made him do something to a nuclear sub before he explored the titanic. Doesn't make sense until you realize it was code for hiding the fact that the titanic was sunk on purpose.
I know I sound kind of crazy if you aren't aware of how the world really works.
I mean, the idea of nuclear power really is to boil water. Having never been involved in anything nuclear, there's no reason it can't just be done via chemical reaction, then the waste could be toxic and need to be disposed.... curious.
Regardless, nuclear threat as code makes sense.
I would need something more convincing to uproot that from my mind.
FWIW, I'm 100% on board that "nuclear" such and such is being used as comms as OP states.
I'm not even remotely close to tossing the whole idea of nuclear weapons out with the radioactive water, so to speak.
Hell, I'm even down with entertaining the idea they're actually some sort of occult weapon at this point. But I'll be honest, that's just because I'm deep diving Twin Peaks and it's a possible implication there. Which sounds stupid, except Twin Peaks is a treasure trove of Occult / Q theories that are pretty wildly believed to be true around these parts. Unfortunately, I can't elaborate mostly due to the fact it's so overwhelming to me, I'd really like to gety facts straight on it before doing so. Which is going to take me months if not longer.
Glad to find an open mind. Wholeheartedly encourage you to read the rest of the blog. He's just scratching the surface, but these comms seem to permeate basically everything we consume. Movies, TV, Music, News, Science. It's EVERYWHERE. Even Oreo releasing it's most stuffed cookie ever was comms to go overboard in election theft. It really is like we're living in the matrix.
You can easily find them yourself too, when you know what to look for, because they are literally everywhere.
Please elaborate? Not reactionary doubt, but curious.
I mean, nukes are real, or what was done with all the testing and all? WW2 as well?
And to world trade; is that just in the sense that if suitcase nukes were an option there would not be the trust to have people travel easily because they might set off a nuke on arrival?
I don't think nukes are real at all. They were used to scare the population. Hiding under desks now from school shooters was hiding under desks from nuclear attack a few decades ago. Same tactic, different era. Both driven by lies from the government.
Nuclear stuff in pop culture or news is a way to send secret messages about dangerous information. For instance, when a guy wanted to go dive to visit the wreck of the titanic, the Navy made him do something to a nuclear sub before he explored the titanic. Doesn't make sense until you realize it was code for hiding the fact that the titanic was sunk on purpose.
I know I sound kind of crazy if you aren't aware of how the world really works.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
That blog will teach you more than you want to know.
I bet you would like the short film "News Benders" from 1968:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYAke_z3RVU
Very relevant to your post. I would encourage anyone who doubts your views on nuclear weaponry to check out the movie, as well.
Alright, well, that is interesting.
I mean, the idea of nuclear power really is to boil water. Having never been involved in anything nuclear, there's no reason it can't just be done via chemical reaction, then the waste could be toxic and need to be disposed.... curious.
Regardless, nuclear threat as code makes sense.
I would need something more convincing to uproot that from my mind.
FWIW, I'm 100% on board that "nuclear" such and such is being used as comms as OP states.
I'm not even remotely close to tossing the whole idea of nuclear weapons out with the radioactive water, so to speak.
Hell, I'm even down with entertaining the idea they're actually some sort of occult weapon at this point. But I'll be honest, that's just because I'm deep diving Twin Peaks and it's a possible implication there. Which sounds stupid, except Twin Peaks is a treasure trove of Occult / Q theories that are pretty wildly believed to be true around these parts. Unfortunately, I can't elaborate mostly due to the fact it's so overwhelming to me, I'd really like to gety facts straight on it before doing so. Which is going to take me months if not longer.
Glad to find an open mind. Wholeheartedly encourage you to read the rest of the blog. He's just scratching the surface, but these comms seem to permeate basically everything we consume. Movies, TV, Music, News, Science. It's EVERYWHERE. Even Oreo releasing it's most stuffed cookie ever was comms to go overboard in election theft. It really is like we're living in the matrix.
You can easily find them yourself too, when you know what to look for, because they are literally everywhere.
I have no issues with the various types of comms. It makes sense that nuclear threats are comms more than literal threats.
The thing is, to say that nuclear energy is a fiction. THAT is where I would need something more convincing. Some alternative that can fill the gaps.
This paper suggests the same sort of thing:
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf