BREAKING: FDA PANEL REJECTS PFIZER BOOSTERS
(www.cnbc.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
It looks like they ARE recommending it for people 65 or older. My guess is they just want to slow walk it out while they kill off old people, which people will write off as "they were old."
Less strain off social security
SS is broke in like 10 years. Next it will be 55 and older to try to get those who will receive in the next 10 or so years.
Haven’t they been saying it’s going broke in 10 years for like 30 years now
Clinton fixed the fund in 1997, then Bush took the trillion surplus and handed out those measly $300 checks in 2001 or 2002....
Yeah but Fed has been printing like mad too. We are reaching a point where they can't do that anymore and have it be effective.
Way till the real number of Elderly killed comes to light.
Then when voter fraud is exposed and all the dead voters happened to be collecting social security too...
Might buy us a few more years.
pensions are expensive.
Targeting the ones on pensions and social security.
I think they will start with the elderly and “high risk” just like they did in the beginning. It gives them the ability to chalk up the deaths happening to age just like you said or “well, they DID have cancer so that’s what really killed them in the end.” Its a lot harder to explain away a bunch of young people dying who have nothing wrong with them. Better to give the 3rd shot to the elderly and high risk first so as not to cause any alarm bells to go off prematurely. Then they’ll start the narrative up again that young people are getting sick and need the 3rd shot. It’s literally “Covid shots 2.0”.
Agreed. I'm trying to talk my parents out of the booster. They are coming to help out with our baby (supposed to arrive any day) and want to get it (and a flu shot) to protect the baby. No. No. No.
Ah, the Cuomo method.