They are Godless and materialistic. Remember, the devil strives to keep people away from God. For the people who "just want to be good people" and don't strive to actively seek out and do evil, materialistic morality is a well-designed buffer to keep them from seeing the true source of Goodness.
This. Evil ends up in a place completely opposite of Good, but it usually starts as just a slight modification and often invoking the same principals as Good. Homosexuality calls itself "love", abortion calls itself "choice", materialism calls itself "science", etc. Satanists aren't going to come out and advertise child sacrifice, homosexual swinger orgies, and genocide of people they don't like, to the general public.
I have many homosexual friends and relatives that are on our side in this battle. I can’t say if their lifestyle is right or wrong, but I know they’d stand by my side if someone ever tried to force a vaccine in my arm.
We must be open to people from all walks of life if we are to win this battle.
"Even if you do good things, you're still on the path to evil! But for $19.95 I can get you back on the road to salvation."
Fuck off with this outdated and wrong ideology. God decides who gets in for His reasons not yours. If you think God can't speak to someone through Satanism, then it seems whatever god you believe in is weak and insecure. Instead of propagating tyrannical thinking like this instead try to embrace what the average Satanist believes and try to win them over with love and compassion as you've been commanded to do.
Except the "good things" that are being espoused are being used to justify forced vaccination.
When a liberal say's that they're anti-racism that's great right? Except they simultaneously believe that black people are too stupid to get ID. So where's the "good" in what they're saying that isn't completely tarnished by their hypocrisy?
What I am railing against is the arrogant puritan smug stance of "Oh you fed homeless in the park? Well you don't believe in Jesus so it means nothing." I would argue that Christian elitism is just as bad if not worse than the pedo cult. Hell, they're probably the same thing.
Whats with all the weirdo satanist apologists lately, its like the new edgy emo religion or something.
I also think as you satanists are so fond of sacrifice maybe you could all go sacrifice each other and then you would closer to satan and we could be left to make the world great again.
One, I am not a Satanist. Two, I make apologies for all who are lost. There is a stark difference between your average poor/middle class Satanist and your rich pedo variety. One can still be saved by God.
I grew up with Christian elitism and I done with it. That mindset is just as tyrannical and evil as other tyrannies.
A lot of Christians need to reread Jesus. It seems many forgot Him calling out the establishment religion and commanding his followers to eat with poor people and sinners. If believe God will protect you, then you can embark into the heart of Babylon and come out unscathed... Mostly... Spiritually at the very least.
Yep. And every Christian would do better to experience some indulgences to understand. I grew up being told about the sins of Babylon yet I never understood them until I experienced some myself.
At the end of the day, people have to decide what is worth understanding and what is not to them. What I can say for certain is puritan bondage will get you nowhere in life or help with changing the hearts of the lost.
They seem genuine at a glance, but let's dissect these "tenets".
One should act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.
What does reason have to do with empathy and compassion? One could argue that it is irrational to act compassionately toward someone who can provide nothing in return. So is this tenet promoting empathy and compassion only when there is self-gain? Or that we should act with reasonable amounts of compassion and empathy?
The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.
Sounds like they are advocates for the ever-changing mob rule mentality.
One's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone.
Does this mean they are accepting of suicide? Which takes precedence the 'inviolable' part or the 'one's own will' part?
The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is forgo one's own.
Again, ambiguous meaning. Yes, the freedoms of others should be respected, but does that mean we allow pedophiles freedom to do as they please as long as their child victims give consent?
Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one's beliefs.
The second sentence is a noble sentiment that the scientific community should strive to meet, but the first sentence is a bit odd. Why is it imperative to equate values to science? Not everything can be explained by science such as love and miracles, but this tenet claims a person's beliefs and morals should be quantified by the scientific method. I see it as a ploy to cheapen our intrinsic value as humans and to dissuade belief in something greater than one's self.
People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one's best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.
I agree with this.
Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.
Spirit prevails over words? What is spirit, but feeling? What are words, but ideas? Are they saying what we feel is compassionate, wise and just supersedes law and order? What is law but a consensus of acceptable behavior? Sure, not all laws are just, but the people have the power to change them. I'd rather live in a law-abiding neighborhood than one whose residents were dictated by subjective feelings.
If science were one's basis for all beliefs, he or she would be crippled. We're simply unable to scientifically test everything. But if we were able, our conclusion would be that science is ultimately tautological.
They are Godless and materialistic. Remember, the devil strives to keep people away from God. For the people who "just want to be good people" and don't strive to actively seek out and do evil, materialistic morality is a well-designed buffer to keep them from seeing the true source of Goodness.
This. Evil ends up in a place completely opposite of Good, but it usually starts as just a slight modification and often invoking the same principals as Good. Homosexuality calls itself "love", abortion calls itself "choice", materialism calls itself "science", etc. Satanists aren't going to come out and advertise child sacrifice, homosexual swinger orgies, and genocide of people they don't like, to the general public.
Right. And not just the opposite of Good, but with a complete abscence of God.
Weird, I woke up in that place today... Wtf I wake up in that place everyday...
Nailed it ..big time!
I have many homosexual friends and relatives that are on our side in this battle. I can’t say if their lifestyle is right or wrong, but I know they’d stand by my side if someone ever tried to force a vaccine in my arm.
We must be open to people from all walks of life if we are to win this battle.
Love the sinner and let God be the judge.
@ Jceggbert
That’s very well said friend. Amen.
"Even if you do good things, you're still on the path to evil! But for $19.95 I can get you back on the road to salvation."
Fuck off with this outdated and wrong ideology. God decides who gets in for His reasons not yours. If you think God can't speak to someone through Satanism, then it seems whatever god you believe in is weak and insecure. Instead of propagating tyrannical thinking like this instead try to embrace what the average Satanist believes and try to win them over with love and compassion as you've been commanded to do.
Lol
Except the "good things" that are being espoused are being used to justify forced vaccination.
When a liberal say's that they're anti-racism that's great right? Except they simultaneously believe that black people are too stupid to get ID. So where's the "good" in what they're saying that isn't completely tarnished by their hypocrisy?
Those are objectively not good things.
What I am railing against is the arrogant puritan smug stance of "Oh you fed homeless in the park? Well you don't believe in Jesus so it means nothing." I would argue that Christian elitism is just as bad if not worse than the pedo cult. Hell, they're probably the same thing.
Whats with all the weirdo satanist apologists lately, its like the new edgy emo religion or something.
I also think as you satanists are so fond of sacrifice maybe you could all go sacrifice each other and then you would closer to satan and we could be left to make the world great again.
One, I am not a Satanist. Two, I make apologies for all who are lost. There is a stark difference between your average poor/middle class Satanist and your rich pedo variety. One can still be saved by God.
I grew up with Christian elitism and I done with it. That mindset is just as tyrannical and evil as other tyrannies.
A lot of Christians need to reread Jesus. It seems many forgot Him calling out the establishment religion and commanding his followers to eat with poor people and sinners. If believe God will protect you, then you can embark into the heart of Babylon and come out unscathed... Mostly... Spiritually at the very least.
No. The Bible says to cast out demons in God's name. Let's do that instead.
Then why do the elite sacrifice children for this bullshit
Yes. Demons. Not the souls of the lost. You are to love the sinner.
Yep. And every Christian would do better to experience some indulgences to understand. I grew up being told about the sins of Babylon yet I never understood them until I experienced some myself.
At the end of the day, people have to decide what is worth understanding and what is not to them. What I can say for certain is puritan bondage will get you nowhere in life or help with changing the hearts of the lost.
Weird about the third one and trying to justify vaccine mandates
The Satanist equivalent of an average Sunday Christian does not partake in that shit. In fact, most Satanists are such out of irony.
Regardless, Christians brought this on themselves when they prioritized doctrine over love... Just like the religious oligarchs of Christs time...
They seem genuine at a glance, but let's dissect these "tenets".
What does reason have to do with empathy and compassion? One could argue that it is irrational to act compassionately toward someone who can provide nothing in return. So is this tenet promoting empathy and compassion only when there is self-gain? Or that we should act with reasonable amounts of compassion and empathy?
Sounds like they are advocates for the ever-changing mob rule mentality.
Does this mean they are accepting of suicide? Which takes precedence the 'inviolable' part or the 'one's own will' part?
Again, ambiguous meaning. Yes, the freedoms of others should be respected, but does that mean we allow pedophiles freedom to do as they please as long as their child victims give consent?
The second sentence is a noble sentiment that the scientific community should strive to meet, but the first sentence is a bit odd. Why is it imperative to equate values to science? Not everything can be explained by science such as love and miracles, but this tenet claims a person's beliefs and morals should be quantified by the scientific method. I see it as a ploy to cheapen our intrinsic value as humans and to dissuade belief in something greater than one's self.
I agree with this.
Spirit prevails over words? What is spirit, but feeling? What are words, but ideas? Are they saying what we feel is compassionate, wise and just supersedes law and order? What is law but a consensus of acceptable behavior? Sure, not all laws are just, but the people have the power to change them. I'd rather live in a law-abiding neighborhood than one whose residents were dictated by subjective feelings.
Tbey dont follow like 4 of them at least based on whats happening. How could you sacrifice anyone and be following the tenets
If science were one's basis for all beliefs, he or she would be crippled. We're simply unable to scientifically test everything. But if we were able, our conclusion would be that science is ultimately tautological.
Keep studying. Learn as much as you can. You have to find your own reasons.
It's a trick. It's a way for them to get people who know nothing about them to defend them. It's a filtration system.
Mark Passio - De-Mystifying The Occult - Part II: Satanism & The Dark Occult