2
TruthyTrue 2 points ago +5 / -3

I wonder what possesses someone to pretend to understand something and then declare their misunderstanding publicly as fact, as you've done here.

There are infinite strings of words possible. Do you expect the gematrix.org server to have every possible string? It simply archives a user's search after the gematria is calculated. What you see are strings that previous users have been interested in.

You seem interested in the subject, so maybe spending 5-minutes looking into it before you consider yourself an expert is warranted?

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get that, but I'm asking, is this new? Seems like that sort of thing would have to happen even before covid.

2
TruthyTrue 2 points ago +4 / -2

Seems pretty standard. For dementia patients etc? What am I missing?

5
TruthyTrue 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're not mutually exclusive. You can have both

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

The triangle one is the Space Force logo, imo. In the J&J shot.

Also wanted to point out the red blood cells sticking to each other in some of those photos. They're not supposed to do that.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

If science were one's basis for all beliefs, he or she would be crippled. We're simply unable to scientifically test everything. But if we were able, our conclusion would be that science is ultimately tautological.

2
TruthyTrue 2 points ago +4 / -2

Oh really? So you don't think those personality traits affect your actions? For example, how can you be greedy without "fuck[ing] over another person?"

What about lust? It's just a matter of time until you knock someone up who you don't love, in which case a child could be raised fatherless. Would you say that child would be fudged over?

How long do you remain prideful until you're marching in the street wearing assless chaps and waving a rainbow flag?

18
TruthyTrue 18 points ago +18 / -0

These people are sick. Look at what they have him wearing. Then look at the chemical structure of graphene. Personally, I think the chances that [they] are not mocking him are very low. Symbolism will be their downfall.

John, if you somehow read this, I'm sorry this happened to you.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

They all seem to have shaved legs.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your plan is mostly a bluff. It's almost useless to bluff after your opponent has already played his hand. Waiting until they issue a mandate to speak up will almost assuredly do nothing for you.

You're basically fantasizing about this event you foresee, which can only increase the probability of its occurrence. When you're thinking of the perfect thing to say to your girlfriend when she dumps you, you're in a bad spot.

If they get enough emails now, it might be stopped. Organize a slack group or something for your coworkers, get them all to send emails BEFORE the mandate. You are making yourself feel as though you're a man of action when really you're a deer in headlights.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do not understand it. That's why I'm asking you, who is so sure of himself.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just did a search. Took two seconds. My point is that there may be some Truths that are hidden from us. That's all. Show me where I lectured anyone?

2
TruthyTrue 2 points ago +4 / -2

So to you, Lucifer and Satan are indistinguishable. I understand that. But why?

-2
TruthyTrue -2 points ago +3 / -5

Yes. I believe Satan is scapegoating Lucifer. A false flag. Lucifer is to Russia as Satan is to China

Edit for downvoters: When I notice that people hold a belief while being unable to explain that belief, it's often the case that they've been deceived. That's all. Still waiting for someone to explain it for me, because I'm genuinely curious myself.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +2 / -1

"No need to look any further as there is nothing of value in doing that."

Wow, you've got it all figured out, don't you?

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +2 / -1

Can you quote the scripture? I haven't seen that stated. I searched 38 bibles for "Lucifer" and only 13 even mention the name.

3
TruthyTrue 3 points ago +4 / -1

Why do you think they're luciferian and not satanic?

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why do you think this is a Luciferian symbol?

It seems to me that they are using Satanic symbolism while blaming their deeds on Lucifer. Which, to me, means we need to look more into Lucifer.

0
TruthyTrue 0 points ago +1 / -1

Another thing about being a 'truth warrior,' as you put it. Truthers are overwhelmed as it is. Getting bogged down in the names of actors etc. is a waste. It's ok to be wrong on the small stuff. I know you're fearful of sharing a meme like this and being embarrassed, but I think it's more fruitful to explain to your recipients that you don't fact check the small stuff. Cuz it's better to take lots of shots on goal than a few perfect ones.

Even if you don't tell them upfront that you're not fact checking the small stuff, it's still going in to their heads. They'll say they don't believe your general worldview because of this small strawman. But they're only doing that to save face and avoid being wrong. Deep down they know that the name of the person who said it, as in this example, does not matter, at all.

1
TruthyTrue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, no, I think the OP should correct the post title. Surprised he hasn't yet.

But I'd wager that most of the people who saw the tweet don't know who the actor is at all, yet still enjoyed it, because it's just such a perfect pwning that it has value on its own.

OP is using a lie as clickbait at this point. OP really should have fixed it by now.

3
TruthyTrue 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've noticed that the official line has changed from "drugname is safe and effective. Ask your doctor about it today!"

Now they don't even want you to ask your doctor. Now it's something like, "drugname is safe and effective. Take it now! Don't ask any questions, worship Moloch!"

view more: Next ›