TRUST THE PLAN. IT IS UNFOLDING. But, OK, bois and xirls, what's next in that plan? Indictments? Prosecutions in AZ? The audit still has things to drop that weren't presented, Friday. Do those come out, and then something else happens? What would that be? And Durham is rolling, does that accelerate?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (144)
sorted by:
Culpable of what though? What crime would ensnare them all?
I think is a list of things you hope would happen, not a list of things that are likely or even possible to happen.
For example, impeachment alone doesn't remove the president. Conviction by 2/3 of the Senate does.
Also the military running the country is not possible under the Constitution. The Republic is gone by that point
Biden is guilty of the crime of abetting an enemy combatant, specifically China. Biden is a puppet that China installed through interference with our elections, which also included the use of a biological weapon, which means we are currently at war with China. This also designates Biden as an enemy combatant as defined by the US Law of War manual. Biden's illegal relationship with China is corroborated by details in Hunter Biden's laptop and interviews with Biden's former business partner, Tony Bobulinski.
Since these traitors always surround themselves with fellow traitors, it's a very safe bet that his entire cabinet is compromised as well. You may be surprised by how many of our elites and political class have traveled to China to be wined and dined by the CCP. It was the "elite capture" of both Democrats and Republicans.
Since we are now at war, the US military running the country is a legal process as defined by the Law of War manual. Since Washington DC is a city-state currently occupied by enemy combatants, it is currently considered occupied territory. When Biden is arrested and the US military fills the vacuum, section 11.2.2.2 provides justification for the military assuming authority:
So the military can take control of DC as an occupying force, then implement martial law for enemy combatants, and Constitutional law for non-combatants. They could even assume control without anyone knowing if they choose to.
So when the public is made aware that Biden, Harris, and his entire staff have been COLLUDING (there's that word) with China and had knowledge of the covid bioweapon, a 2/3 majority of the Senate to impeach seems like a realistic expectation.
https://tjaglcspublic.army.mil/documents/27431/61281/DoD+Law+of+War+Manual+-+June+2015+Updated+Dec+2016/5a02f6f8-eff3-4e79-a46f-9cd7aac74a95
Not to mention, that probably 2/3 of Congress and the Senate will also be removed for COLLUSION too
Exactly this 👆u/Mister_Winston!
You may want to read that manual again. A combatant is the equivalent of a soldier. China would be an enemy not an enemy combatant. We are not at War with China and this is important legally for a charge of treason. We didn't have any charges of treason during the cold war. The Rosenbergs were not tried for treason, but espionage in a Federal Court, not a military tribunal.
Biden or any member of Congress or any civilian not found on a battlefield would not be designated an enemy combatant because they were not subject to military jurisprudence before their arrest. The Universal Code of Military Justice is quite clear on this. See Article 2 of the UCMJ. They would face trial in a regular civilian court. The ISIS TRUCK ATTACK on NYC in 2017 is going through federal, not military courts.
The military is currently running the country?
Who? What's the name of the officer in charge of the country. Is it more than one? What branch?
The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.
I didn't say the military is currently running the country.
You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!
You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate about a theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?
The Rosenbergs were dealing in nuclear weapons. ...so much, much bigger threats than nuclear weapons.
You said this
I see now you were discussing the pretext for the military to run the country in your theory.
The conflation I was pointing out was the conflation between an individual and a country.
I'm pulling things to the weeds ???....in bad faith!?!.
I thought I was discussing the central point of your theory and why I think it's hopium