WHO’s own tracker - enter product name when searching so enter “Comirnaty” - results shown are for all Covid vaccines registered:
http://vigiaccess.org/
Ah, yes, makes perfect sense to clog up the front page w posts about the others who have not had any adverse reactions (yet) only a month out after taking an experimental vaccine w no longterm studies and is so safe that the media has to lie not only about the products themselves but also the generic drugs that have been around for 50+ yrs and have shown positive results at a fraction of the cost.
And face it, even if he ends up being the only one to have severe adverse reactions, 1 out of 39 of the most physically fit men on the planet is not a good stat for the pro-vaxx camp considering the virus itself has a survivability rate of >99.9% for young fit men like chardy..
I think the survivability rate is probably better than 99.99% for that demographic, especially with known treatment methods now, unlike the first few months of covid.
You forgot to complete the sentence: "Will you make a post about the other 38 men's singles tennis players who got the jab in the last month that did not have negative effects YET?"
Even with the "yet" correction you're rather missing the point, I think.
What is the risk of death or permanent injury to a healthy 34 year old man who contracts COVID? Do you know that information or do you just choose to ignore it?
Let's pretend you know what his risk of injury or death from COVID is. What happens when that healthy 34 year old man contracts COVID and is then treated early with Ivermectin? Do you know what his new risk number is?
What human with any level of intelligence or self preservation instinct would willingly allow someone to inject them with an entirely experimental drug - one that skipped animal testing and that had a history of all the animals dying in prior test studies with similar products - unless NOT taking that unknown risky injection would put them in exceptionally high levels of imminent danger of death or permanent disability?
This should not be as hard a decision as some people are making it. This is 1000% about virtue signaling and 0% about rational thought processes.
Very sad. Will you make a post about the other 38 men’s singles tennis players who got the jab in the last month that did not have negative effects?
Their time will come.
http://www.skirsch.com/covid/ACIP.pdf
https://www.skirsch.io/
https://1000covidstories.com/
https://nomoresilence.world
https://files.catbox.moe/mj44w3.pdf
https://thecovidworld.com
https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/
https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/how-many-people-are-vaccines-killing
https://openvaers.com
https://vaers.hhs.gov
https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk
Searchable Yellow Card: https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.
EUdravigilance: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/eudravigilance.html
https://www.adrreports.eu/en/index.html
WHO’s own tracker - enter product name when searching so enter “Comirnaty” - results shown are for all Covid vaccines registered: http://vigiaccess.org/
Brazil also released data - https://www.marktaliano.net/over-32000-people-dead-in-brazil-following-covid-19-vaccines-according-to-official-media-report/
Australia is releasing data… https://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-suspected-side-effects-associated-covid-19-vaccine
Shill detected.
You think?
Ah, yes, makes perfect sense to clog up the front page w posts about the others who have not had any adverse reactions (yet) only a month out after taking an experimental vaccine w no longterm studies and is so safe that the media has to lie not only about the products themselves but also the generic drugs that have been around for 50+ yrs and have shown positive results at a fraction of the cost.
And face it, even if he ends up being the only one to have severe adverse reactions, 1 out of 39 of the most physically fit men on the planet is not a good stat for the pro-vaxx camp considering the virus itself has a survivability rate of >99.9% for young fit men like chardy..
I think the survivability rate is probably better than 99.99% for that demographic, especially with known treatment methods now, unlike the first few months of covid.
Thankfully you just did
*yet.
You forgot to complete the sentence: "Will you make a post about the other 38 men's singles tennis players who got the jab in the last month that did not have negative effects YET?"
Even with the "yet" correction you're rather missing the point, I think.
What is the risk of death or permanent injury to a healthy 34 year old man who contracts COVID? Do you know that information or do you just choose to ignore it?
Let's pretend you know what his risk of injury or death from COVID is. What happens when that healthy 34 year old man contracts COVID and is then treated early with Ivermectin? Do you know what his new risk number is?
What human with any level of intelligence or self preservation instinct would willingly allow someone to inject them with an entirely experimental drug - one that skipped animal testing and that had a history of all the animals dying in prior test studies with similar products - unless NOT taking that unknown risky injection would put them in exceptionally high levels of imminent danger of death or permanent disability?
This should not be as hard a decision as some people are making it. This is 1000% about virtue signaling and 0% about rational thought processes.
if 1/39 had career ending side effects that's 2.5%
what are the odds that the china virus itself would end the career of a young athlete?
0%?
there's this new thing called risk assessment. look into it.
Thanks for exposing your burner!
Any "vaccination" that results in 1/39 getting a serious side effect would NEVER be approved, unless there were some real bad people behind it all.
How’d you find these guys D-Dimer tests?