The case had to do with flu vaxx, but court ruled that a vaxx cannot be required because it violates informed consent.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
How does informed consent not apply to the testing, which is also a medical procedure?
That's awesome! Whenever you're ready to take a couple weeks off just swab a grapefruit and boom covid positive!
If you administer the test yourself, you are clearly complying, but is the compliance free of coercion?
That is the entire problem here. Many people have complied with the injection without informed consent (seemingly everyone since they are not forthcoming with information about adverse reactions), and many others have been coerced into taking it.
Informed consent free of coercion should also apply to the testing since it is an invasion of your body that puts you in contact with a chemical substance (it is not just a Q-tip they use to collect the sample)
I know, right? No one is going to sinus-fuck me with one of those damn vaulting poles with the cotton-and-spike-protein tip.
Article: COVID PCR Test Swabs are as dangerous as inhaling Asbestos
An experimental physicist and bio-materials researcher examined various PCR test swabs under a microscope and found that the fibres they contain are as dangerous for human beings as inhaling asbestos.
Professor Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test swabs and analysed their ingredients. The results showed that they are made of tough materials and contain a large number of nano-particles including silver, aluminum, titanium, and glass fibres. All of which are not declared on the PCR test package insert. https://lichtnahrung2015.wordpress.com/2021/05/21/covid-pcr-test-swabs-are-as-dangerous-as-inhaling-asbestos/