Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
(media.communities.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
Yeah, it's a marxist argument framed to justify lining up those they deem 'selfish' against the wall to be shot. Can't believe it was stickied.
Us debating and explaining the flaws in these arguments are among the most important things we can be doing. It is only after analyzing and debating such arguments that we can inform others of the errors in their reasoning. IMO it is exactly these types of topics that should be stickied (presented for debate) over all other topics. The results of such debate are the red pills needed to change the world.
"Hey guys, it's totally a good to put people up against the wall if they aren't acting in concert with the needs of the state right?"
This isn't a debate, and it wasn't posted with critique. This is someone stickying actual marxist dogma on great awakening and leaving it to people like me to be downvoted for pointing it out.
I didn't downvote you. I almost never downvote, and I certainly never do it because someone disagrees with me, or says something I disagree with.
Now that that is out of the way, the ONLY way to wake up the world is by showing people the truth. You can't tell them the truth, they have been brainwashed. That is why it must be shown. You can only show people the truth if you understand where they are coming from. You can only understand where people are coming from if you really try to understand their arguments.
You are welcome to call this "Marxist propaganda", that doesn't mean I agree. I think it is a legitimate question. Not everything Marxist is illegitimate in theory. That is why it has power. If it was all obviously wrong, it wouldn't be threatening to take over the planet. It is the misapplication of reasoning in the details that makes it so evil. In order to address those evils that have infiltrated the minds of the sleepers you must look at them, debate them, and understand them completely.
The search for truth when using reason, logic, science, law, etc. is always a debate.
Always.
Dude don't be obtuse. I wasn't saying it can't be debated, I said it wasn't framed as a debate - it did not come with critique or comment. And I never accused you of personally downvoting me. Quit inventing goalposts.
And yes, marxism is inherently wrong. Cells are a constituants of a body, societies are composed of individuals. One isn't conscious so can neither decide for itself, not be tyanized, the other can. They aren't comparable. There is nothing of value extrapolating up and marxists do NOT have a point here or anywhere.
Posting without critique or framing is NOT the examination you describe. It's dogma and propoganda subtlely slipped knowingly or otherwise, no different than if I slipped without comment some cleverly disguised Thomas Sowell quote into a commy sub on Reddit.
Marxism allows leeches to feed off of others. They don’t rid of the non-contributors. It’s literally polar opposite to Marxism. Can’t believe you’re commenting this everywhere.
You're noting what marxism is in practice, I'm noting that this is a marxist justification for their priciples - Kill the rich because anyone that doesn't toe the line and takes more than they 'need' is a disservice to the greater organism. The body does this, therefore so ought society they argue.
It's an actual marxist argument that actual marxists use.
Cells get more than they “need” every day, in most humans living in the industrialized world. More salt than they need, more sugar than they need, more of all kinds of things than they need. These “selfish” cells are not being “lined up and shot”. The short story is discussing cancerous cells. Cells which break the very laws that raised them. These aren’t mere trespasses or transgressions, they are distortions so great that their greed and corruption spreads beyond themselves and poisons the entire being. It rewrites the laws themselves to ensure its undiminished growth.
Although, that’s just my interpretation. Isn’t the proof that it’s a genuine question evidenced in our vastly different answers?
I'm not arguing the marxist interpretation. It's not mine. I'm not arguing it's right or has merrit. I'm trying to explain to you that it IS a marxist argument. A marxist infographic was stickied to GA without critque or comment.