248
Comments (26)
sorted by:
11
everticus 11 points ago +11 / -0

So 2.1 million reports for the jab, vs 5,693 for ivermectin ... I guess we know which is safer, and more effective.

4
GDZeus 4 points ago +4 / -0

And ivermectin’s use goes back all the way to 1992, whereas the jab only goes back to 2014.

C-19 vaxx - total records says 2,183,912. From 2014 - 2021. However - for 2014 (1 record) - 2016 (1) - 2017 (2) - 2018 (29) - 2019 (82) - 2020 (2254) - 2021 (2,181,543). Boom!

Ivermectin total records says 5693 From 1982 - 2021. However - for 2020 (1427 records) - 2021 (1112 records) = 2539 for c-19 time period it would have been used for.

Remdesivir has 7454 records and goes from 2019 (only 1) - 2020 (5052) - 2021 (2401).

I was kicked off of a Meniere’s Disease FB page because when someone asked after getting their first jab if it can affect this disease, because the person was having sided effects associated with the disease and asked if they should get the 2nd shot. I told them the truth, then like 2 people spouted their nonsense about how they were angered & upset by what I said, I told them I didn’t care about their feelings, that I meant everything I said and answered the op’s question.

Now that I see the reactions from c-19 on VigiAccess, I so wish I could go on there and say I F#cking told you so!

For Ear and labyrinth disorders (72880)! The list of reactions are many that are associated with MD, even says Meniere's disease (257), Vertigo (29173), Tinnitus (26999), Deafness (2793), Vestibular disorder (223).... seriously either all or majority of the reactions listed could be associated with MD or Vestibular disorders. I have MD & Vestibular Migraines. So you can imagine what the jab would have done to me. I’m so thankful for y’all here and that I didn’t get & never will get the jab!

5
Mukzn [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
GDZeus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks fren!

5
radx4 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unclear why you have to use duckduckgo.com to access http://vigiaccess.org/. You can just directly link it. And it does show up in all search engines.

1
colonial113 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha, I saw my parents do this. Instead of just typing a simple address to the bar, they went to google and typed it in there

1
Mukzn [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I don't why he did that either. I included the direct link in the comments for all frens to see.

4
deaddragon 4 points ago +4 / -0

wow incredible, millions are effected there is no way in hell i will ever take the covid vaccine

4
Mavdick96 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck DDG, btw. They are using leftist tactics to hire their people like Google.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

So should we just stop searching for stuff? DDG was always behind lefty stuff, but their search results censor far less than google.

2
Mavdick96 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always other competition.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

There really isnt in a meaningful way. This isn't like boycotting McDonald's to go to a local burger joint.

Searching things is crucial and an unequivocally important aspect of research, especially the nature of the information we research on here.

By all means support competition, but it'll be a while before a competitor gets its algorithm good enough to be useful.

Startpage just basically uses Google but adds a layer of privacy.

Quant wasn't very good, I wanted to like it.

Duckduckgo is by far the best one at yielding any meaningful results that you can pull up in a discussion with someone without having to spend hours diving.

1
FeebleOldMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Qwant.com has brave addons. Or use 4search.com

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am familiar with quantity but the results are nowhere near as good or relevant as DDG

3
RS34ME 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at the breakdown between male and female:

Sex: Female 1506355 (69%); Male 649324 (30%); Unknown 28233 (1%)

3
The_Watcher 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tried it and found: Formication (3701)

After a brief OMG moment I realised that I had read that incorrectly the first time!

3
SurelyShirley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whoa. That's a long list. Looking at the bottom, 70 percent of reported reactions are from age 18 - 64! And totals for 2021 make all the other years insignificant.

2
Kaizen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can’t see death in the list, is this just a distraction? Then they’ll have death shown later at a 0.01% and call it “low risk”?

2
everticus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Death isn't listed as one of the adverse reactions. Do we assume that the cause of death is included in one of the other categories.

3
RS34ME 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look under General Disorders and administration site conditions. It shows Death at 11,449.

1
KickingPugilist 1 point ago +1 / -0

How Is it so low when vaers alone had at least as many?

2
escapefromearth 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is just a small collected sampling, the real numbers are far higher.

1
everticus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you, I didn't drill down, was just looking at top list.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Make_It_So 1 point ago +1 / -0

If someone followed that exactly they would get confused. Just skip the duckduckgo part and go directly to the site.

1
escapefromearth 1 point ago +1 / -0

So why are there entries for adverse events for this vaccine recorded before the virus even existed? Hmmmm

2021 2181543 2020 2254 2019 82 2018 29 2017 2 2016 1 2014 1