Not sure if you are just here to troll or if you are just somehow still confused.. if you don't care to take the word from all the anons who have tried to answer your question,, take the words from Q- u/#q4881
Are you talking about the media ones? because the media are the only ones who want there to be Q Anon, no person who follows Q would conceive of themselves as Qanon.
If your just trying to make a classification or an argument for a general term to be used why do you need it to be Q Anon?
QAnon was used because when Q first appeared, just saying “Q” wasn’t deemed specific enough. Q was pretty obscure so there was a sense you might be referring to the character from Star Trek, or the character from James Bond, or the British rock magazine, or the podcast, or the letter. “QAnon” was a way to clarify that.
NO bc it is ‘their’ term, we don’t play their games; ‘qanon’ is a term they created to control the narrative, so when anyone looks into Q, all they come across first is everything the media has flooded with ‘qanon’. It muddies the waters between what Q has said and what any account with ‘qanon’ in it has said; demoralizes when ppl wrongly equate the two and then are wrong. Quit playing their game.
The issue is not caring about what they say, but rather not supporting their narrative, and making things more difficult for newbies. Just Because they call us racist doesn’t mean we throw on Klan robes to be sarcastic. I don’t give a flying fuck what they say about us, But I do care about the ease of access to reliable information for people just curious or starting to join this movement
If you're trying to direct people to look up real information to redpill them and wake them up you don't tell them "oh just go do a search for "racist terrorists" and you'll find what you need. Just like you don't tell them to do a search for "QAnon".
You don't tell them these things because they won't find any good information searching them and also because they aren't real. We're not "racist terrorists" and "QAnon" doesn't exist.
Because there is nothing "of Q"...
99% of legit Anons were Anon prior to Q ever coming to pass.
i wanted to upvote this comment but it already had 17 upvotes - so i wrote this instead :)
Not if the defining characteristic of the relationship is Q literally pointing out to make a distinction.
Qanon is what the media have labelled it in order to confuse the issue.
A true NPC at work, frens.
Not sure if you are just here to troll or if you are just somehow still confused.. if you don't care to take the word from all the anons who have tried to answer your question,, take the words from Q- u/#q4881
Please stop.
Are you talking about the media ones? because the media are the only ones who want there to be Q Anon, no person who follows Q would conceive of themselves as Qanon.
If your just trying to make a classification or an argument for a general term to be used why do you need it to be Q Anon?
QAnon was used because when Q first appeared, just saying “Q” wasn’t deemed specific enough. Q was pretty obscure so there was a sense you might be referring to the character from Star Trek, or the character from James Bond, or the British rock magazine, or the podcast, or the letter. “QAnon” was a way to clarify that.
How does one "Follow" Q?
Q stopped posting almost 1 year ago.
You can Follow Anderson Cooper... or Tucker... but not Q. The crumbs stopped.
NO bc it is ‘their’ term, we don’t play their games; ‘qanon’ is a term they created to control the narrative, so when anyone looks into Q, all they come across first is everything the media has flooded with ‘qanon’. It muddies the waters between what Q has said and what any account with ‘qanon’ in it has said; demoralizes when ppl wrongly equate the two and then are wrong. Quit playing their game.
The issue is not caring about what they say, but rather not supporting their narrative, and making things more difficult for newbies. Just Because they call us racist doesn’t mean we throw on Klan robes to be sarcastic. I don’t give a flying fuck what they say about us, But I do care about the ease of access to reliable information for people just curious or starting to join this movement
If you're trying to direct people to look up real information to redpill them and wake them up you don't tell them "oh just go do a search for "racist terrorists" and you'll find what you need. Just like you don't tell them to do a search for "QAnon".
You don't tell them these things because they won't find any good information searching them and also because they aren't real. We're not "racist terrorists" and "QAnon" doesn't exist.
If you want to label it, then label it:
"Truth Anons"