Senator Calls For Cognitive Testing on all Older Leaders. Yes Please!!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
And they have to pass a test on our system of government and cannot vote on a bill until they do pass the test.
They should not be allowed to pass a bill until they have read it from cover to cover.
They should require every member of congress to read it out loud to the whole group before they pass a bill. That would be each bill, read 435 times in the House to 435 people, and 101 times in the Senate to 101 people.
For every bill.
Lets see how many 6000 page laws we get.
Or just pass a law that institutes single issue bills. This way they can't take a funding bill and hide a bunch of laws that screw over the population. Every issue has to stand on its own.
It's a partial solution to one small problem, but keeps in place the entire fraudulent system.
We have trillions of pages of laws.
We started with two pages of laws.
We don't need more laws, we need to completely eliminate the system that exists and start from scratch, using the roots of the old system, but changing the loopholes (in the constitution itself) that allowed what happened to happen.
Specifically, individual sovereignty was implicitly stated in the constitution, and then denied and ultimately destroyed in the amendments, starting with the Bill of Rights (eminent domain, end of the fifth amendment).
If instead individual sovereignty was explicitly stated in those first two pages, the bill of rights would have been understood as redundent, and would have never been necessary at all.
If both the individual citizen (the Person), and the group of individuals that make up the government (We The People) are explicitly stated as equals, none of what has happened can have happened. None of it.
When it comes to sovereign citizens either all citizens are sovereign, no matter the size or nature (job) of the citizen group (which was I believe the original intent was, and was stated implicitly in both the constitution and the DoI), or no citizens are sovereign; they are instead vassals to a sovereign government (which is what we have now).
That is what a monarchy is (where the government is defined as "the crown"). In our case I think what we have is a Corporatacracy, where the government is defined as a corporation (a group of people made into a legal single person) that is sovereign to citizen vassals.
If it can't be coherently explained in 5 pages or less, it's bullshit. Plain and simple.
I've been reading quite a few laws lately that fall into that range. In each case they are that long because it was designed to obfuscate and overcomplicate and bypass previous laws (without their removal) or overwrite the intent of the Constitution.
I think if it takes more than a paragraph or two, its probably not a good law.
Hell, if its more than a sentence or two, its probably not a good law.
Agreed!
Love this idea!!!