In reality, the clot shot has negative effectiveness, i.e. its victims are more likely to catch the WuFlu. According to the latest official NHS UK report, for every age group over 30 the vaccinated are more likely to catch the WuFlu, with some age bands being almost double as likely to catch it.
Basically, if you take the clot shot, you get 4 months of slight protection (provided it doesn't kill you) in return for permanently weakening your immune system for the rest of your life. This is why under 30s have slightly better statistics (for now), because they were the last to get it and therefore in most cases are still in their initial 4 month period.
FTA: This is odd, considering that Donald Trump, who continues to call himself the “father of the vaccine,” just appeared with Bill O’Reilly the other day to say that his “Operation Warp Speed” injections “work really well.”
Exactly. And the story will break. With every passing day, every social media post-testimony, every injury to someone’s friend or relative or coworker, every analysis of the adverse reaction recording systems, every medical or pharma employee whose conscience gets the better of them, every announcement by the medics and doctors and scientists risking everything to get the truth out, every media organ who runs a story, and every share by the digital warriors, the truth will out. These injectable biological products must not only be stopped, but those who knew there was enough evidence to stop the program months ago but did nothing must be held to account.
We address this gap by comparing SARS CoV-2 infection by vaccination status from February 1, 2021 to August 13, 2021 in the Veterans Health Administration, covering 2.7% of the U.S. population. Vaccine protection declined by mid-August 2021, decreasing from 91.9% in March to 53.9% (p<0.01, n=619,755).
The study covered 2.7% of the US population but said effectiveness was 53.9%.
I'm not trying to defend the jab but that doesn't mean we should use fake data like they do.
Here we go a study from Lancet, showing the highest efficacy of any C19 vaccine being 1.3%
ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.
I've seen it debated whether it will alter your DNA or not. Even if it does, who is to say that alteration is also to turn off your immune system? The alteration could be doing other things, and affecting the immune system is due to other junk in the syringe.
I know someone who got a different vaccine years ago, and it seemed to affect their immune system. For the first year after taking it, they were coming down with infections every other week, and had to take meds constantly for it. After that for about 6 years, it was happening once a month. After that it was once a year. It seems they did eventually recover.
Now the side effects of this "vaccine" seem worse than others. But hopefully the vast majority will survive (we'll see). If they eventually wake up and make it a decade, perhaps they'll be able to have recovered, and we'll have a less trusting society around us, which will be a good thing.
So you put a shit shot in your body to “return to normalcy and protect” yourself, only to deal with the shit show of totally ineffective shots. I predict the efficacy of Pfizer and Moderna will be the same and they can terminate you with endless boosters which also do zero to protect you.
In reality, the clot shot has negative effectiveness, i.e. its victims are more likely to catch the WuFlu. According to the latest official NHS UK report, for every age group over 30 the vaccinated are more likely to catch the WuFlu, with some age bands being almost double as likely to catch it.
Basically, if you take the clot shot, you get 4 months of slight protection (provided it doesn't kill you) in return for permanently weakening your immune system for the rest of your life. This is why under 30s have slightly better statistics (for now), because they were the last to get it and therefore in most cases are still in their initial 4 month period.
FTA: This is odd, considering that Donald Trump, who continues to call himself the “father of the vaccine,” just appeared with Bill O’Reilly the other day to say that his “Operation Warp Speed” injections “work really well.”
Exactly. And the story will break. With every passing day, every social media post-testimony, every injury to someone’s friend or relative or coworker, every analysis of the adverse reaction recording systems, every medical or pharma employee whose conscience gets the better of them, every announcement by the medics and doctors and scientists risking everything to get the truth out, every media organ who runs a story, and every share by the digital warriors, the truth will out. These injectable biological products must not only be stopped, but those who knew there was enough evidence to stop the program months ago but did nothing must be held to account.
...”we’re NOT gonna take it”... 🎶
Any claims of effectiveness now or at any time for this jab are as bogus as the stats derived from the bogus PCR test.
This is some fucking awful reporting. I was curious so I followed the source (this was citing some shit blog, and that blog was citing this: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.13.21264966v1.full.pdf )
The study covered 2.7% of the US population but said effectiveness was 53.9%.
I'm not trying to defend the jab but that doesn't mean we should use fake data like they do.
Here we go a study from Lancet, showing the highest efficacy of any C19 vaccine being 1.3%
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
The shot destroys your immune system permanently. Totally counterproductive.
How do we know it's truly permanent? Maybe after a decade the immune system starts to recover, as long as you don't take any more shots?
Of course destroying your immune system even on a temporary basis is going to be counterproductive.
Because it changes your DNA; the software system for the human body.
I've seen it debated whether it will alter your DNA or not. Even if it does, who is to say that alteration is also to turn off your immune system? The alteration could be doing other things, and affecting the immune system is due to other junk in the syringe.
Also, nice shock absorbers on your tank there.
I know someone who got a different vaccine years ago, and it seemed to affect their immune system. For the first year after taking it, they were coming down with infections every other week, and had to take meds constantly for it. After that for about 6 years, it was happening once a month. After that it was once a year. It seems they did eventually recover.
Now the side effects of this "vaccine" seem worse than others. But hopefully the vast majority will survive (we'll see). If they eventually wake up and make it a decade, perhaps they'll be able to have recovered, and we'll have a less trusting society around us, which will be a good thing.
That's interesting. What was this vaccine for?
MMR.
Oh no, quick give me another booster!!!
The link is now dead :(
But I just saw today on “newsmax” that the vaccines are 90% effective in 5 to 11 year olds! They are coming for the children with no remorse.
Ooops that page cant be found??
So you put a shit shot in your body to “return to normalcy and protect” yourself, only to deal with the shit show of totally ineffective shots. I predict the efficacy of Pfizer and Moderna will be the same and they can terminate you with endless boosters which also do zero to protect you.