21
posted ago by xchainlinkx ago by xchainlinkx +21 / -0

7 - PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES You may not access or use the Site for any purpose other than that for which we make the Site available. The Site may not be used in connection with any commercial endeavors except those that are specifically endorsed or approved by us. As a user of the Site, you agree not to: ...

23 - disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site.

Comments (18)
sorted by:
11
Forsaken1 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think William Cooper (r.i.p) would have said something like,

“It's Trump's site Trump's rules Whether I or we like it or not.

That's Freedom

Don't like it? Create your own platform with your own rules.

That's Freedom.

4
Slyver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't like it? Create your own platform with your own rules. That's Freedom.

As we have just witnessed such a thing is not so simple. If it wasn't for The Show which is the likely reason Facebook et al have gone full Ministry of Truth (blatantly), Facebook et al would likely still be on top.

Once people become part of a social system, changing is difficult. When your friends are there, you stay there. I mean WE JUST SAW THAT happen, for a couple decades.

If the site will not allow criticisms of Trump, then the site is deeply flawed. I am not saying that is what this is saying, but IF that is what it is saying, its a serious problem. We are learning RIGHT NOW that not being able to criticize people is the path to the end of the human race. Creating a NEW platform where certain people or organizations can't be criticized, that gets a large percentage of the population is not a source of "Truth" but a source of the same shit on the other side of the fence.

Again, I'm not saying that's what this is. I doubt it will work like that, but to suggest "If you don't like it, build your own" is naïve to the extreme, and I suggest willfully blind to what we have just learned about what censorship does to the human race.

Free speech is only free speech if all speech is free.

3
glade 3 points ago +3 / -0

for real what's the issue?

2
slokill 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same argument that Twitter and Facebook use when censoring us.

However; I'd hope this is just for the test version.

8
skanon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Clearly this is directed at all the agents of false news. They will need to access this site and try to direct the narrative (by bashing the truths coming out on this platform). These agents are opening up the door to their demise.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
xchainlinkx [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

verb (used with object), dis·par·aged, dis·par·ag·ing.

to speak of or treat slightingly; depreciate; belittle: "Do not disparage good manners."

to bring reproach or discredit upon; lower the estimation of: "Your behavior will disparage the whole family."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Slyver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Censorship in any form stops debate. Without debate we can't find the truth, at least not through the use of words.

Censorship in all forms must be... censored

if we are to ever have a chance at becoming a people who care about understanding the truth.

3
GoAskAlice 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't have a problem with their TOS. The fake media and the people who hate us might, though.

2
Fefifofumdrum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you think he was going to set up something like this and let the shills and glowies and lefties run roughshod all over and through it? No, man. He's in business.

He has a plan for everything, and an objection to his terms of service on his site is just first-world-problems, if you get my meaning.

We've been saddled with the likes of the tw and fb poison, and you complain because DJT says he has the right to protect his thing here? Dude... Keep it all in balance.

For most of us, this is a Godsend.

2
EnemiesDestroyed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suppose he’s trying to say do not slander anyone falsely.

4
xchainlinkx [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'll wait until they update their TOS to explicitly say that. If I can't narc on Trump for his public position on the vaccines then this won't bode well for the platform.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LBTrumplican2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are looking to hard into it.

Critique =/= harm

Harm means publishing a hit piece full of lies.

1
motrhed3 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, it gives them the ability to ban due to ToS violation. Those of you not willing to agree to the terms are free to do something else.