OSHA openly advocates ignoring vaccine related injuries: no need to report them because they hurt the agenda…
(media.greatawakening.win)
👀 EYES ON! 👀
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Why isn't this being attacked with lawsuits? This is contrary to OSHA precedent and undermines their entire purpose.
exactly. arbitrary rules invalidate every other safety rule and the entire agency.
Because the commie judges would say we have no standing
Because the regulations do not really "exist" yet
This is true and an interesting observation. Question: Since the guidelines are not published, why would OSHA even mention the no reporting of adverse side effects?
Because white hats may not control everything and there are still thrashing nefarious elements in government.
I tend to think its a case of a David against a very formidable and large Goliath.
It is open collusion in genocide . . . Insanity rules the day - in Libworld, at least!
Yep. Did you read the Brian Cates posts, in which he states Trump's EO during a declared emergency cannot be rescinded as long as the Emergency is active? Then Cates talks about PEADs that are instructions for the military during the Emergency that are standing orders. These are not privy to the current Administration until the Emergency is declared over.
I think this would be a worthwhile talking point to better understand the dynamics going on. Biden can end the Emergency, but if he does the EAU comes to an end and then the Vaxxine companies are no longer protected from personal injury lawsuits. The original Congressional Act signed into law provides the legal definition of 'vaccine'. This is the definition that the vaxxine companies are bound to, not the constant changes the CDC and Mirriam Webster dictionary have provided.
What does this mean for us? The EAU will continue until 'some kind' of development causes it to end. What could it be?
When an Act is passed and signed into law, the legal terms are defined. It's all there. Now think about this for a moment. There would be no laws that have meaning if the words of the law changed willy-nilly. Words like 'up' could be changed to mean 'down', 'over' would be 'under' and 'crime' could be made to mean 'lawful'.
The original meaning of the words in the law are laid out and defined. 'Vaccine' in the Act that gives immunity to vaxxine companies is already defined. That is the law they are functioning under. The rest of the stuff we are seeing from the CDC and so forth is all deception.
The physical manifestation of the GA Movement, perhaps? Red October will soon bleed out . . . I sure hope we get more than DWAC and the start of Durham subpoenas out of it. I'm still expecting a restored Constitutional Republic . . : )
DWAC is Trump's social media venture, no? What do you know about Ben Swannn's 'Sovren'?
For the same reason companies like Boeing tried and may still try to force workers like me to work with chemicals while pregnant with labels on them that say such things as ‘Reproductive hazard’ and ‘May cause fetal alcohol syndrome’