Yes, please add constructively to our cause. Where We Go One, We Go All can’t get anywhere fueled on only silly things. Humor is great. But bring more of something to the movement too.
Actually, I disagree with this. ^ The memes are actually a very strong driving force, because it forces people to do research, it causes confusion for normies who might actually do their own research for the first time ever, similar is the Let's Go Brandon! movement. Maybe we need to diversify GA.win. People keep posting these types of messages, they get stickied, then they fade into oblivion, and the people who don't live here never even see the message. I'll message the moderators to see if we want to "diversify our portfolio" aka section of meaningful discussions vs memes vs q theory vs hyping etc.
We’ve been discussing how to bring important stuff back as you’re suggesting. I think it’s just how the actual text program works on the site itself. But any further encouragement is totally appreciated!
Is there a way to add a tag or something to a post you make like research, meme, etc. and then you can filter out other posts to show only posts with a specific tag?
Memes combined with hearty discussion, for sure. But I really like the digging, sourcing, and intellectual nature of the Q crowd.
I don't mind some memes sprinkled in for the keks, but we have to be careful not to let this turn into a dumping ground of memes.
The comments and we'll researched posts leave me in awe sometimes with how good many are at really picking apart narratives and finding connections with who funds who.
Yes, please add constructively to our cause. Where We Go One, We Go All can’t get anywhere fueled on only silly things. Humor is great. But bring more of something to the movement too.
Actually, I disagree with this. ^ The memes are actually a very strong driving force, because it forces people to do research, it causes confusion for normies who might actually do their own research for the first time ever, similar is the Let's Go Brandon! movement. Maybe we need to diversify GA.win. People keep posting these types of messages, they get stickied, then they fade into oblivion, and the people who don't live here never even see the message. I'll message the moderators to see if we want to "diversify our portfolio" aka section of meaningful discussions vs memes vs q theory vs hyping etc.
We’ve been discussing how to bring important stuff back as you’re suggesting. I think it’s just how the actual text program works on the site itself. But any further encouragement is totally appreciated!
Is there a way to add a tag or something to a post you make like research, meme, etc. and then you can filter out other posts to show only posts with a specific tag?
Not that I’m aware of my fren.
Memes combined with hearty discussion, for sure. But I really like the digging, sourcing, and intellectual nature of the Q crowd.
I don't mind some memes sprinkled in for the keks, but we have to be careful not to let this turn into a dumping ground of memes.
The comments and we'll researched posts leave me in awe sometimes with how good many are at really picking apart narratives and finding connections with who funds who.
Yes I agree.