You have to wonder if they know about the tens of thousands of deaths and millions of severe health problems due to the vax?
Since the answer is obviously YES, then why does the FDA violate it's own rules to approve a deadly vaccine that is extremely harmful, but proven to be not-beneficial?
Answer: They have a different agenda and it's NOT about our health.
Each one of these people has access to the same data that we have yet they vote in lock step. Each and every one of them is sealing his fate. I prey that no harm comes to any of these children as a result of these dangerous and unnecessary jabs, but I fear the worst. God help us!
It was really a mind-bend to listen to the whole hearing. The public commentary was scathing, and heroes like Steve Kirsch presented irrefutable evidence that the vaccines are killing and maiming people. And the accounts from first-person sufferers were heart breaking.
A short break, then the 18 doctors on the panel convene. All give their opinions about why the vaccines are needed, and they totally ignored any and all evidence from the public commentary. It was like two different universes, the real world universe of vaccine injury and death, and the medical world of "this is what we believe, and we're doing the right thing." The doctors found multiple reasons for supporting the vaccines for kids. Dr. Peter Marks, the head of the FDA, was the chief witness to getting it passed.
The whole thing was frightening and disheartening, as everything we have been aware of for months (i.e., lack of a durable antibody response, the risk of ADE, immune system degradation, etc.) was completely ignored and disregarded by the physicians. It was as if they had never heard of it, even though people directly before them were practically screaming the dangers.
You have to wonder if they know about the tens of thousands of deaths and millions of severe health problems due to the vax?
Since the answer is obviously YES, then why does the FDA violate it's own rules to approve a deadly vaccine that is extremely harmful, but proven to be not-beneficial?
Answer: They have a different agenda and it's NOT about our health.
They are COMPLICIT. They cannot hide from what they've done. Hope the $$$ was worth it assholes.
Each one of these people has access to the same data that we have yet they vote in lock step. Each and every one of them is sealing his fate. I prey that no harm comes to any of these children as a result of these dangerous and unnecessary jabs, but I fear the worst. God help us!
You had better hope that this is just about money.
It was really a mind-bend to listen to the whole hearing. The public commentary was scathing, and heroes like Steve Kirsch presented irrefutable evidence that the vaccines are killing and maiming people. And the accounts from first-person sufferers were heart breaking.
A short break, then the 18 doctors on the panel convene. All give their opinions about why the vaccines are needed, and they totally ignored any and all evidence from the public commentary. It was like two different universes, the real world universe of vaccine injury and death, and the medical world of "this is what we believe, and we're doing the right thing." The doctors found multiple reasons for supporting the vaccines for kids. Dr. Peter Marks, the head of the FDA, was the chief witness to getting it passed.
The whole thing was frightening and disheartening, as everything we have been aware of for months (i.e., lack of a durable antibody response, the risk of ADE, immune system degradation, etc.) was completely ignored and disregarded by the physicians. It was as if they had never heard of it, even though people directly before them were practically screaming the dangers.
Get names of all 18.
Where did you heard the whole hearing? Link please?
Disregard. I see link below in comments.
Greed is the best case scenario. Fuck you And your children is the worst case scenario.
Cui bono. FOLLOW THE MONEY