Karen Fann will not seek re-election. CodeMonkeyZ implies she is compromised.
(www.azcentral.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (167)
sorted by:
All I asked for was evidence of one thing he's accomplished for anons or the Q community.
Was that an impossible task?
He set up and ran the board Q posted on for the majority the drops upon Q's request. Likely more than your sad existence will amount to.
u/#q468
Perfectly timed post.
Imagine downvoting undisputable fact.
Well he helped convince people to wait two more weeks.
TWO WEEKS!
I'm a bit shocked that you don't KNOW what Ron did. Are you new?
Ron says he’s Q also.
Really? Go ahead and prove that because I have never seen him claim he is Q.
I have heard a lot of anons say "We ARE Q", which was apparently just a catchy phrase to them meaning we're all working on the same team.
I know he pretended to be an anon, even though everyone knows his name, to become the face of anons who follow Q on HBO.
I know he linked to another namefag paytriot NeonRevolt as his "most important post of his entire life" immediately prior to the election.
I know he has a "project Odin" that he likes to promote as though it is already a thing and imminent for years now that has vaguely something to do with the internet.
I know that every other week everyone posts about Ron date fagging about something super important "tomorrow morning" that never pans out.
How is it we're deep into this thread and there are still zero Ron supporters who can state what he has done that should be considered important to the Q community or anons.
Maybe you will eventually be the one to break that trend.
As far as him running for congress, does the name Dan Crenshaw mean anything to you?
He set up and ran 8kun on behalf of Q. Q trusted him, so I do too - even if I don't agree with him on every single subject under the sun. You want to present him as a bad guy? You are in direct opposition to Q.
Do you think it was Q's intention that hundreds of people he referenced be considered infallible and not subject to scrutiny?
People like you are EXACTLY why I'm against Ron. You consider him infallible based on his association with Q, and when he falls he'll take the Q movement along with him.
That's also EXACTLY why Q, in their wisdom, decided we should remain anon. Ron is not anon. You know his name, right?