FBI destroys evidence in Rittenhouse Case
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Mistrial. Rittenhouse's attorneys should be filing for a mistrial right now, and cite FBI malfeasance as the reason.
No. There is more than enough video evidence to fully exonerated Rittenhouse and he's already been through more than enough crap he never should have had to experience. His lawyer needs to win this one then sue the FBI, the state and many others for withholding evidence and politically motivated prosecution. Then Rittenhouse can sit back, get on with life, and wait for the fat restitution checks to roll in.
Only issue if it’s accurate is what the jury consultants said about the lead defense lawyer barring them from the court room for the jury selection process....
Seems a daft thing to do especially given what some juries have decided when it comes to politics over law and or reasonable doubt.... like RS trial....
WWG1WGA
What if the goal of the FBI blatantly tampering with evidence is to cause a mistrial, and thereby avoiding setting a precedence for self defense in the what is one of the most obvious cases of self defense in our nations history?
This is exactly how Lawfare by the FBI has worked.
Their aim is to perpetuate legal costs and drown out defense. It works. Look at Flynn. He had to sell basically everything he owned as did Roger Stone, and more.
The FBI has also been caught witness tampering & stacking juries. They have a 98% conviction rate which is statistically impossible without extreme corruption.
Repeatedly they have brought cases they knew would be dismissed simply because they knew these cases would in effect Terrorize and Devestate Financially those accused. The accusation to the FBI is a large portion of their power - this was bad under Hoover & got much worse under Mueller and Subsequently James Comey.
They ARE a Gistappo & their goal is to literally snuff out the pulse of WE THE PEOPLE by targetting grass roots movements, subverting them, and then destroying them.
Under the FBI:
GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT
and
UNEQUAL APPLICATION OF LAW
Justice is supposed to be blind.
FBI instead uses Justice to Blindside WE THE PEOPLE.
This is what I was thinking as well. FBI hoping the lawyers get the case thrown out to avoid precedent so they don't have to drop the charges making it too obvious it's what they wanted.
There’s also the matter that declaring a mistrial now would mean legal strategy has already been exposed to opposing sides
Brady material. Kyle cannot be tried if the government destroyed evidence that might tend to exonerate him.
How could there be a fair trial?
Fair enough. If he's effectively exonerated and can't be tried again, that's what I want for him. The kid has been through hell just for being a decent human being. I just don't want him to go through a trial again when he should be able to win here and now.
You forgot to add, "as he reloads and gets ready for the next riot"
I pray for this kid.
May the actions of others solidify his Grace ‘& Resolve. What is to come will need Calm Warriors.
it's not a mistrial. it's called a brady violation. during a trial, brady violations are grounds for what's called a "judgment of acquittal", meaning the case doesn't even go to the jury, the judge declares the defendant innocent.
of course, the judge is not going to give a JOA.
https://www.pagepate.com/what-is-a-brady-violation/
https://theappeal.org/the-epidemic-of-brady-violations-explained-94a38ad3c800/
brady violations are on the rise because mass surveillance and phones capturing everything nowadays mean there's more physical evidence than ever. where cops could previously lie, or prosecutors could insinuate to run up conviction rates, they can't anymore. so the only way to eek out convictions sometimes is for them to withhold evidence.
No then they will just say he got off by technicality, Enough evidence exist to show he defended himself. They literally pulled a handgun to his head.
Brady material. Kyle cannot be tried if the government destroyed evidence that might tend to exonerate him.
How could there be a fair trial?
BINGO!