In 2010 when i was aware of social credit amd facial recognition technology and observed our inescapable wifi and video feed dungeon, i was a "kook" and "blerha blerg CoNsPiRaCy."
Then Snowden. Now instead of "blerha blerg CoNsPiRaCy" it's "everybody knows that, so what?"
All of his running and hiding and headlines and data and all he did was change the normy mind from "they aren't listening" to "ssssshh, they're listening." Objective of the operation.
Contrast w Bradley Manning. He exposed war crimes for which a Durham-style series of indictments would have ended the war and hung th Bush administration.
One they tortured and turned into a girl. The other one is played by J Gordon Levitt in a popular and hyped movie.
Your history is revisionist. Tell me what "war crimes" Bradley Manning exposed. I'll wait.
I do however, know good American soldiers that were killed or injured because the media twisted gun camera footage into something it was not.
Bradley Manning was a fag that took it upon himself to release classified materials direct to the enemy (a hostile press), without investigation, without due process, and resulting in the loss of American lives.
Chelsea Manning is a tranny abomination that should have joined the 41% while locked up at Leavenworth, but was bailed out by Obama and raised up as a hero to the commie cause.
Ok lol do you remember when they ran a piece on Fox where they literally called him a faggot? I do. Good doggy
Your response tells me all I need to know. You have zero firsthand knowledge of what actually happened.
You still haven't answered my question: What was exposed that was a war crime?
Im sure it's a violation of international law to park and then machine gun ambulance personnel and journalists. A better question would be how this footage did anything to the soldiers there.
I was just ignoring you though because youre an obvious retard who went hook line and sinker when the cabal broadcasting sold it with homophobia and you got hard
Pede, I can't help you.
You're doubling down with someone that has first hand knowledge, including the classified stuff that still isn't public and I know you've never heard or seen. I still have a piece of shrapnel from that same area of Baghdad. I keep it as a reminder that Iraqis used kids as human shields, and you can't trust anyone outside your family. We gave candy and water, we got RPGs and 7.62x39 in return.
I still talk to my brothers that survived VBIEDs that hit their convoys in 2010 because the videos were used to create new martyrs. I still go to memorial services for friends that were killed because some Afghani asshole decided to blow himself up at Bagram for retribution in 2013.
All I can say is you might want to discount those left-wing commie sources and recalibrate what you think you know. What you're saying is not the truth. Manning is a traitor and needs to swing from a rope.
So your refutation is that gunning down journalists and medics isn't a war crime bc you have war artefacts from war zones?
I will have shields of vaccinated kids 3 rows deep when it gets hot here so that other points a non point to me
No. The war crime is intentionally targeting civilians. The Apaches went in there to protect a disabled HMMWV from SAF and RPGs. They saw armed men run into that building that were firing. When they lit up the aggressors, they had no way of knowing the Bongo that pulled up were attempting to evac civilians, nor did they know anyone was a "journalist".
No intentional targeting, no crime. It's what happens in war. We do our best to avoid civilian casualties, but they do happen.
Now do the Battle of Samarra and read up on taking back the Great Mosque.
I don't remember a building involved at all in th vid i saw. It was an ambulance destroyed in the road or other vehicle and waves of killing civilian responders.
Keep apologizing for cabal war crimes. Double down by invoking old world retard religious rivalries.
just think if the Clowns were running the NSA right now
for President Killary
Steve Pieczenik was the first to speak of this openly, before Q.
As a long time conspiracy realist, I knew the heavy media coverage signaled that it was an operation carried out by the controllers.
Sometimes I wonder when peeps here are finally going to pick up on this. The media covering the "Wuhan weaponized virus" is a more recent example. There's no such thing as viruses, so it's easy to see this is simply another story to spread fear and keep the lie alive.
It is true that "SARS-COV2" was created in a "lab in Wuhan". What they don't tell us is that it's just a computer-generated sequence that has no basis in reality other than 1s & 0s stored on a hard drive.
The bioweapon was created in the United States (UNC/Pitt) before being shipped to Wuhan. It is very real. Yes, there is a huge psyop and false positive testing that go along with it, but the respiratory problems and clotting associated with the bioweapon are as real as it gets. Saying it’s all computer sequence is bullshit.
Whatever it is, ivermectin counters it. Many other drugs help as well.
Yeah? Where's the proof? Doesn't exist. How do I know? Because "viruses" don't exist - not a one. Because there's zero proof that they do. It's all deception and propaganda, beginning to end.
Not arguing that people aren't getting sick. Since Ivermectin helps, perhaps there's a parasite involved? However, zero chance it's a "weaponized virus" as nobody can even prove that a "natural virus" exists.
If the media is covering a topic that can't be easily verified and is designed to spread fear, there's exactly a 100% chance it's a lie.
Dont bother man ur arguing against mentall walls who believe germs are dangerous meanwhile the human body is made of 99% bacteria. They take poison to cure themselves of stuff that doesnt exist and get mad id u try to teach them not to irrationally destroy their own bodies needlessly
It's a bad-tasting red pill fosho!
I agree there's no covid and dismiss many people hailed as heroes here for pretending otherwise. Fuck everyone whose name we know is where im at
Yep, it's all a sham. The glacial awakening proceeds drip by drip.
Did I say it was a fucking virus? No. I said bioweapon. Parasite is a possibility. If you read “parasite pill” theory it makes some sense. Don’t know what it is, but it certainly isn’t just 1s and 0s on a computer.
https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf
Do I have your position right? The media is telling us the TRUTH about a Wuhan created bioweapon, but they're telling us a LIE about it being a virus, when in reality it's a man-made bio-weapon parasite. Right?
The media lies about everything. Sorting through their shit is impossible. Partial truths give people the illusion of legitimacy, but beyond that their only true goal is gaslighting. They push fear and the deep state agenda.
“Covid” wasn’t created in Wuhan, but some of it ended up there to at least start the pandemic discussion. The reality is it probably was already being released here prior to Christmas 2019. The Wuhan people collapsing dead in the streets was all theater to start the fear push. I’m not sure what kind of bioweapon it is, but it is something transmissible, whether by airborne or fecal/oral route. It appears to create spike proteins just like the vaccine creates. What those spike proteins truly are? Not sure.
That’s my position.
Fair enough.
I went to a talk by a government official at one of the Oxford colleges, basically debating on whether Snowden was a hero or not. At the end people were invited to put their hands up if they thought positively about him; there were people watching closely to see what would happen. Then came the film about him on Netflix. That was enough for me.
What did he reveal?nothing we didn't know. But he changed the normy narrative from ssshh that's dumb to ssshh that's true.
I think I remember something about VV Putin finding it very amusing to have the CIA agent Snowden there in Russia. I guess he knows the "Keep your enemies close" doctrine.
Snowden selectively implicated the NSA with his vault 7 reveal. He's not a white hat.
My instinct strongly tells me he's an amoral spook.