These people are stupid. The DA has the compression app on the courtroom laptop that he is showing to the court and the jury but tells the Judge that he has no idea how the file got compressed. Must have been compressed by the recipient's device. LOL. I suppose the recipient's device renamed the file too 21 minutes after the HD version was created.
It's so blatently obvious to us and luckilly, thanks to court tv, it all got caught on tape with timestamps. They lied. The truth will come out eventually, the evidence is already circulating. We are talking about it here first, but soon enough you'll hear people like tim pool and crowder bring it up, then fox news, then the law gets involved because it went mainstream and the normies found out.
Oh shit, Tim Pool's first video is of this! The Judge and Defense already know. And saying the Judge wants the prosecution to take the stand to explain themselves.
Because the prosecution crafted a new argument about provocation based on the shady last minute video we are discussing where they claim it shows kyle pointing a gun before the attack and argue that it wasn't self defense if he started it. The video doesn't show shit, it's all a fucking lie, but it's the excuse any activists on the jury can now use to punish Kyle. It's so obvious the way this all went down that this was a setup, dropping this video at the last minute at the end of trial, giving the defense a ridiculously low res version so they couldn't make out anything and didn't bother to object or craft a defense because they were just looking at blobs on a screen, then the big switchero happens when the jury sees the high res version instead while the prosecution attempts to use the power of suggestion to make them see what isn't there. The judge I think knows, but he doens't have the tech lingo and expertise to argue it. It's a massive problem. Shady as fuck how this all went down.
It's not the fact they lied that pisses me off, it's the fact the Judge just limply sat there and allowed this manipulated digital crap in his courtroom
He was so close to ordering a separate hearing for that evidence and putting council under oath. Then the next thing I know he’s saying maybe the jury will do his job so he doesn’t have to make a decision.
I think was DS all along... idk... I seem to be only one that doesn't trust that judge, I hope I'm wrong, but my guts are warning me ... I hope I'm wrong and there's good people out there, but this trial has been a shit show from the get go.
That makes sense if they did all of these things to expose their corrupt conduct, for example the edited video. I can see why defense yesterday was missing most opportunities to counter their arguments and completely destroy them. I was wondering why they didn't barely do anything during those moments, now I am understanding it's like don't interrupt an enemy destroying themselves entirely in the process.
The judge is simply ignorant about the tech and he knows it. You can see the look on his face, everyting in him is telling him the prosecution is lying, but he doesn't understand the tech well enough to craft an argument to throw at them. He wants the defense lawyers to bring in an expert to explain it. He's stuck where he is.
These people are stupid. The DA has the compression app on the courtroom laptop that he is showing to the court and the jury but tells the Judge that he has no idea how the file got compressed. Must have been compressed by the recipient's device. LOL. I suppose the recipient's device renamed the file too 21 minutes after the HD version was created.
It's so blatently obvious to us and luckilly, thanks to court tv, it all got caught on tape with timestamps. They lied. The truth will come out eventually, the evidence is already circulating. We are talking about it here first, but soon enough you'll hear people like tim pool and crowder bring it up, then fox news, then the law gets involved because it went mainstream and the normies found out.
Oh shit, Tim Pool's first video is of this! The Judge and Defense already know. And saying the Judge wants the prosecution to take the stand to explain themselves.
How is this trial still going on? I thought the guy already confessed he pointed a gun at Kyle last Wednesday.
Because the prosecution crafted a new argument about provocation based on the shady last minute video we are discussing where they claim it shows kyle pointing a gun before the attack and argue that it wasn't self defense if he started it. The video doesn't show shit, it's all a fucking lie, but it's the excuse any activists on the jury can now use to punish Kyle. It's so obvious the way this all went down that this was a setup, dropping this video at the last minute at the end of trial, giving the defense a ridiculously low res version so they couldn't make out anything and didn't bother to object or craft a defense because they were just looking at blobs on a screen, then the big switchero happens when the jury sees the high res version instead while the prosecution attempts to use the power of suggestion to make them see what isn't there. The judge I think knows, but he doens't have the tech lingo and expertise to argue it. It's a massive problem. Shady as fuck how this all went down.
They should be arrested and then disbarred
It's not the fact they lied that pisses me off, it's the fact the Judge just limply sat there and allowed this manipulated digital crap in his courtroom
He was so close to ordering a separate hearing for that evidence and putting council under oath. Then the next thing I know he’s saying maybe the jury will do his job so he doesn’t have to make a decision.
I wonder if the DS/threats got to him.
I think was DS all along... idk... I seem to be only one that doesn't trust that judge, I hope I'm wrong, but my guts are warning me ... I hope I'm wrong and there's good people out there, but this trial has been a shit show from the get go.
Amen, don’t trust anybody.
Could it all be in part of the White Hats plans for take downs of bad actors?
That makes sense if they did all of these things to expose their corrupt conduct, for example the edited video. I can see why defense yesterday was missing most opportunities to counter their arguments and completely destroy them. I was wondering why they didn't barely do anything during those moments, now I am understanding it's like don't interrupt an enemy destroying themselves entirely in the process.
The judge is simply ignorant about the tech and he knows it. You can see the look on his face, everyting in him is telling him the prosecution is lying, but he doesn't understand the tech well enough to craft an argument to throw at them. He wants the defense lawyers to bring in an expert to explain it. He's stuck where he is.
Is someone bri he evidence in that he doesn't understand he has the obligation to have proof that the evidence is true m, clean and Unmessed with.
If you can prove it's original it's not allowed.
I think you’re right. I think lawyers will now need a tech aid at all times to point out technology fraud
Along with the judge