People get fired all the time when shit they tweeted five years ago gets brought up again. So technically can't Biden get fucked over for his comments? 🧐
It's really difficult to win a libel or slander suit. It's almost always a waste of time and money.
Biden definitely should have kept his mouth shut. He really had no business bringing the kid up. His handlers should do a better job in keeping him from speaking. He's always sticking his foot in his mouth or saying something truly idiotic.
But we can't have double standards. It's beneath us and puts on the same level as leftists. They are always going on about suing President Trump for slander or libel for this, that, or the other now that he is a private citizen again.
And it was worse when he was President.
I think the point is that if him having said it as a private citizen means he's not immune, then you can't also penalize him on the basis of being President now. It's one or the other, can't have your cake and eat it too so to speak.
If there is a way to sue Biden successfully of course I'm all for it.
What law was it that Harris was violating advocating, while VP, for people running for office? I think it was McAullife? Not sarcastic but a real question because if she can’t vouch for candidates while in a position of power then I’d assume there are other mechanisms in place to the same effect for Biden in relation to an ongoing trial. Just my guess
Kyles character has certainly been defamed by Biden for his dipshit remarks. Is the fake President protected at all in this situation? I am no lawfag....
Not to rain on your parade but you can't sue a sitting president for defamation. Once he becomes a private citizen it is a completely different thing. Its also a bad reflection on him and exposes him for being divisive and race baiting. So this chick is wrong. Seriously guys, the president is immune and the same rules do not apply. The only way to remove is Impeachment or 25th amendment. Nixon vs Fitgerald 1982 In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the President is entitled to absolute immunity from legal liability for civil damages based on his official acts.
The lawsuit also triggered a landmark legal precedent by the Supreme Court, which ruled that a sitting president is not exempt from civil litigation for acts committed outside of public office.
I heard Nicholas Sandmann on Hannity saying that he knows from his own cases that you can’t attack someone for calling you a « white supremacist » because that is protected by free speech.
Maybe he should be locked up for spreading "hate speech." Like don't they now say there should be "consequences" for those spreading "misinformation?" Isn't this the Left's rally cry these days? Would it apply to them?
Hmmm I like it!
Any rat bastard politician calling a minor conceived in Liberty anything deserves what’s coming
I met biden. He deserves a stiff backhand
I hope you thoroughly disinfected yourself after the encounter.
No touching and we were outside a Tex Mex. He had a habit of coming to this restaurant and kicking us all out back in 2009
the truth is afimative defence . so as a non lawyer I think you are safe to tell the truth .
People get fired all the time when shit they tweeted five years ago gets brought up again. So technically can't Biden get fucked over for his comments? 🧐
The lawsuit will be put on hold until Biden leaves office. Then people will reee about him suing a senile old fool.
Yea she’s not wrong but she can also go back to the hole she crawled out of
I know just the lawyer, "Lin Wood"
Literally, he is the one. Wonder if he’s already reached out to offer his services
Might as well since the doj is coming after him
Won't be allowed to be pursued until biden is no longer resident.
I'm not defending Biden, but if he said it as a private citizen, doesn't he have freedom of speech?
Denying people their constitutional rights is something leftists do.
there are libel and slander laws however.
It's really difficult to win a libel or slander suit. It's almost always a waste of time and money.
Biden definitely should have kept his mouth shut. He really had no business bringing the kid up. His handlers should do a better job in keeping him from speaking. He's always sticking his foot in his mouth or saying something truly idiotic.
But we can't have double standards. It's beneath us and puts on the same level as leftists. They are always going on about suing President Trump for slander or libel for this, that, or the other now that he is a private citizen again. And it was worse when he was President.
Biden's words directly lead to an increase in death threats to Kyle and his family. Kyle absolutely has a case if he wants to pursue it.
He does, but as the leader of the “free” world, he’s not really much of a private citizen
I think the point is that if him having said it as a private citizen means he's not immune, then you can't also penalize him on the basis of being President now. It's one or the other, can't have your cake and eat it too so to speak.
If there is a way to sue Biden successfully of course I'm all for it.
What law was it that Harris was violating advocating, while VP, for people running for office? I think it was McAullife? Not sarcastic but a real question because if she can’t vouch for candidates while in a position of power then I’d assume there are other mechanisms in place to the same effect for Biden in relation to an ongoing trial. Just my guess
Kyles character has certainly been defamed by Biden for his dipshit remarks. Is the fake President protected at all in this situation? I am no lawfag....
I hope he sues Bidet and every other MSM outlet that slandered him!
Not to rain on your parade but you can't sue a sitting president for defamation. Once he becomes a private citizen it is a completely different thing. Its also a bad reflection on him and exposes him for being divisive and race baiting. So this chick is wrong. Seriously guys, the president is immune and the same rules do not apply. The only way to remove is Impeachment or 25th amendment. Nixon vs Fitgerald 1982 In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the President is entitled to absolute immunity from legal liability for civil damages based on his official acts.
Yes you can, because the offense was committed before he became president. See Clinton for precedent.
when was Clinton sued as sitting pres?
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/clinton-settles-sexual-harassment-suit-1998-983371
I heard Nicholas Sandmann on Hannity saying that he knows from his own cases that you can’t attack someone for calling you a « white supremacist » because that is protected by free speech.
Maybe he should be locked up for spreading "hate speech." Like don't they now say there should be "consequences" for those spreading "misinformation?" Isn't this the Left's rally cry these days? Would it apply to them?
I can't stand this horse-faced bitch but she's right