You didn't think we HIGHLIGHTED 'Epstein' for no reason did you?
Those who were once protected are no longer.
Timing is EVERYTHING.
Hunters become PREY.
Q
It was a head fake. Is Epstein connected to more people or is Maxwell? She was the one in between the “buyers” and “sellers”. Epstein was essentially used to blackmail and launder money, Maxwell connects to everyone. She was Epstein’s handler. Once Maxwell’s case is public…. It will open the door for CA/NVXIM/Chandler.
Maxwell (British) Chandler (American)
The NETWORK is huge.
Down goes the ship.
Watch CA. Watch NY.
How do you know they are buying and trademarking photos?
They've been busy scrubbing pictures off the net for over 3 years now.
After Q posted about some of these activities, and naming names, anons got busy searching out evidence. Stories in various online magazines turned up with pictures of Epstein and Maxwell at celebrity parties. There was a Vanity one (I think it was Vanity - there was another online rag with good pictures, but I don't recall that name offhand) that I was going to send to a friend I was talking to about Q, but when I went back to it a few days after it showed up on 8 chan, all the pictures had been scrubbed from the article. Not long after that, as the name Epstein began to surface again, the MSM started posting pictures of Trump with Epstein and Maxwell. Of course they had to be selective, to avoid giving away the game.
Getty Images still has a lot of photos of Ghislaine at events. https://www.gettyimages.com/search/2/image?family=creative&phrase=Ghislaine%20Maxwell
Look at how they have the images sorted too. The first few pictures are with Trump and or Melania when you search “Ghislaine Maxwell” - nothing suspicious with trying to make it look like Trump and Epstein were super close. Typically when you do a search on Getty it will bring up the most current images and you can filter by date from there. These images of Trump are from the early 2000s and yet these photos are the “most current?” Give me a break, the people who work at Getty are trash human beings. I don’t have the time to scrub through the photos, but I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of the people pictured with Ghislaine go uncredited. But had you done the same search 5/10 years ago all that info and a lot more photos would be available on Getty.
the Getty family trust controls California. this is a criminal organization just like the Clinton foundation.
I've seen complaints about how they've taken control of images they don't actually own. I don't know how easy it would be to prove - it's like knowing the Clinton syndicate has taken control over most of the country in the mid 1990s, because of all the circumstantial evidence, but any proof that turns up is quickly dealt with.
There's a lot of ways to scrub images - you just described a couple of them.
There was a NYP article about it; I’ll try to find the archive once I am home.
archived PageSix that I found while awkwardly sitting in my car:
The production team for the BBC Maxwell documentary supposedly tried to contact people in pictures with her/in her circle. As expected, no one wanted to be associated with her.
I will say I had a lot more luck finding picture of her earlier in the year than the last few months, but that’s purely personal experience.
How can you trademark a photo? Buy the copyright from the photographer first?