You know how the CDC has recently changed he definition of the word "vaccine" to define it as something that it has never been defined as?
They are doing the same thing with the word "isolation."
They are claiming that if you take someone's body fluid (blood, urine, snot), and you ADD TO THAT some monkey kidney cells, some human aborted fetal cells, some cow blood cells, some antibiotics, and other things, then THAT is what they are calling "isolated" because that body fluid (blood, urine, snot) came from one person. But they ADDED a bunch of other things to it.
They NEVER found a virus within that soup. Instead, they add antibiotics to kill the cells, and then when the cells die, they claim there was a virus in there that (a) killed the cells in the lab petri dish and (b) was inside the person and it was what made them sick.
The ENTIRE "science" of virology is a SCAM.
Watch that video I posted above. Tom Cowan does a great job of explaining it.
It will blow your mind when you find out what they call "isolation." Their claim of isolation is a LIE.
I think what we’re debating is not whether “virus/viral particle” are real. But whether they are naturally occurring or man made. I can buy that virus are all man made engineered poisons given to us via vax or food or whatever delivery mechanism. Virus being man made is not that hard to believe since their life cycle is bizarre. It’s literally just genetic code injected into another cell.
However another point about them not being to “isolate” a pure form of the “virus”. Virus can’t really survive on their own. They always need a host cell to “hijack”. So I can believe that “viruses” are man made “chemicals” and have to be injected (via shots or food) into people. Ie they could have been poisoning all of us via vaccines and creating all these diseases.
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when people say there is no “virus” is it implies people aren’t getting sick or that the disease isn’t real.
beyond this there's theories that many so called viruses are actually parasitic diseases which could explain chicken pox contagion and also explain why ivermectin is proving so effective against so many faux viruses/diseases. if the chicken pox condition is caused by an external skin parasite these parasites could reasonably be expected, and likely proven if effort is made, to infect others via contact. conversely, chicken pox could be an allergic reaction to something just as people react to poison oak and how it's contagious while the oils are still present
What would you consider evidence that a virus exists?
Take a fluid sample from a sick person (blood, urine, snot), find the virus within, and remove it from the fluid. That is isolation.
Then, "clean off" any material clinging to the virus, so that ONLY the virus is in the petri dish. That is purification.
This process can be, and is, done with bacteria.
But this process has NEVER been done with ANY virus.
What do you tell people who say that there have been viruses isolated and who give you links to pubmed and such?
You know how the CDC has recently changed he definition of the word "vaccine" to define it as something that it has never been defined as?
They are doing the same thing with the word "isolation."
They are claiming that if you take someone's body fluid (blood, urine, snot), and you ADD TO THAT some monkey kidney cells, some human aborted fetal cells, some cow blood cells, some antibiotics, and other things, then THAT is what they are calling "isolated" because that body fluid (blood, urine, snot) came from one person. But they ADDED a bunch of other things to it.
They NEVER found a virus within that soup. Instead, they add antibiotics to kill the cells, and then when the cells die, they claim there was a virus in there that (a) killed the cells in the lab petri dish and (b) was inside the person and it was what made them sick.
The ENTIRE "science" of virology is a SCAM.
Watch that video I posted above. Tom Cowan does a great job of explaining it.
It will blow your mind when you find out what they call "isolation." Their claim of isolation is a LIE.
I think what we’re debating is not whether “virus/viral particle” are real. But whether they are naturally occurring or man made. I can buy that virus are all man made engineered poisons given to us via vax or food or whatever delivery mechanism. Virus being man made is not that hard to believe since their life cycle is bizarre. It’s literally just genetic code injected into another cell.
However another point about them not being to “isolate” a pure form of the “virus”. Virus can’t really survive on their own. They always need a host cell to “hijack”. So I can believe that “viruses” are man made “chemicals” and have to be injected (via shots or food) into people. Ie they could have been poisoning all of us via vaccines and creating all these diseases.
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when people say there is no “virus” is it implies people aren’t getting sick or that the disease isn’t real.
beyond this there's theories that many so called viruses are actually parasitic diseases which could explain chicken pox contagion and also explain why ivermectin is proving so effective against so many faux viruses/diseases. if the chicken pox condition is caused by an external skin parasite these parasites could reasonably be expected, and likely proven if effort is made, to infect others via contact. conversely, chicken pox could be an allergic reaction to something just as people react to poison oak and how it's contagious while the oils are still present