You know how the CDC has recently changed he definition of the word "vaccine" to define it as something that it has never been defined as?
They are doing the same thing with the word "isolation."
They are claiming that if you take someone's body fluid (blood, urine, snot), and you ADD TO THAT some monkey kidney cells, some human aborted fetal cells, some cow blood cells, some antibiotics, and other things, then THAT is what they are calling "isolated" because that body fluid (blood, urine, snot) came from one person. But they ADDED a bunch of other things to it.
They NEVER found a virus within that soup. Instead, they add antibiotics to kill the cells, and then when the cells die, they claim there was a virus in there that (a) killed the cells in the lab petri dish and (b) was inside the person and it was what made them sick.
The ENTIRE "science" of virology is a SCAM.
Watch that video I posted above. Tom Cowan does a great job of explaining it.
It will blow your mind when you find out what they call "isolation." Their claim of isolation is a LIE.
I think what we’re debating is not whether “virus/viral particle” are real. But whether they are naturally occurring or man made. I can buy that virus are all man made engineered poisons given to us via vax or food or whatever delivery mechanism. Virus being man made is not that hard to believe since their life cycle is bizarre. It’s literally just genetic code injected into another cell.
However another point about them not being to “isolate” a pure form of the “virus”. Virus can’t really survive on their own. They always need a host cell to “hijack”. So I can believe that “viruses” are man made “chemicals” and have to be injected (via shots or food) into people. Ie they could have been poisoning all of us via vaccines and creating all these diseases.
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when people say there is no “virus” is it implies people aren’t getting sick or that the disease isn’t real.
I think what we’re debating is not whether “virus/viral particle” are real.
Yes, that is exactly what we are debating: whether or not viruses are real.
I am saying that the particles that virologists see in an electron microscope are NOT what they claim to be. They are nothing more than artifacts of dead cells. Those dead cells were caused by the process the virologist used to look at them in the first place.
Those particles (i.e. "the virus") did NOT EXIST in the body before the virologist went through the steps in the lab. Watch the video I posted above.
But whether they are naturally occurring or man made.
Viruses do not exist in the human (or any other animal's) body. They are figments of the virologist's imagination, and are created by the virologist in the lab, when posioning the cells of the thing they are studying.
I can buy that virus are all man made engineered poisons given to us via vax or food or whatever delivery mechanism.
It is possible that bioweapons are engineered in labs, and they are called viruses. But those things have to be injected into a person in order to make them sick. Maybe they are also working on aerosol versions, but according to many who are discussing this, it has to be injected into the blood, in order to bypass any natural pathway that would be used by nature (breathing in, for example), because the human body will kill it in that case.
It’s literally just genetic code injected into another cell.
There is NO genetic code found in SARS-CoV-2. The so-called "genetic sequence" used for the "test" to determine if someone has it was made in a computer program. It was NEVER taken from a sample of the "virus" because there is NO sample of the virus -- anywhere in the world. You cannot take a genetic code from something if you don't have a sample of it in the first place.
Virus can’t really survive on their own. They always need a host cell to “hijack”.
You can't prove that. It is pure speculation, and no virologist has ever proven it.
It also cannot be true. Because the narrative is that one person has the virus, sneezes, it floats out into the air, hangs around, and then someone else breaths it in, and it causes them to get sick.
If they"can't really survive on their own," then how do they go from one person to another? They can't. So, this unproven narrative is pure speculation, and cannot be true.
It scares the shit out of people, though. And that is probably the purpose of this narrative.
They always need a host cell to “hijack”.
Again, more speculation. Nobody has EVER proven that -- for ANY virus.
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when people say there is no “virus” is it implies people aren’t getting sick or that the disease isn’t real.
This is not a valid way of looking at it. I understand. Before I looked into this, I would have agreed with you. But that is because this thinking is mistaken.
There is (a) the "virus" and then, there is (b) the sickness (which is claimed to be caused by the virus).
The sickness of measles is claimed to be caused by a virus, which is conveniently called the "measles virus." Polio is a sickness, which is claimed to be caused by a virus, which is conveniently called the "polio virus." Covid-19 is a sickness, which is claimed to be caused by a virus called SARS-CoV-2.
These are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. There is (a) the virus, and then there is (b) the sickness.
I am NOT saying that people do not get sick. They do. I've been sick -- more than once, with something claimed to be caused by a virus (colds, flu, chicken pox, etc.).
But that does NOT mean these sicknesses are caused by viruses. If viruses do not exist, then it follows that these sicknesses are caused by SOMETHING ELSE.
Nobody is studying what the something else might be. Nobody is studying this because they all buy into the idea that it is all caused by viruses, so there is no reason to study anything else.
That is the big mistake.
The people debunking virology say that these illnesses are caused by malnutrition and/or external environmental poisons and/or natural detoxification processes in the body. The sicknesses are real, but they are not caused by imaginary viruses.
beyond this there's theories that many so called viruses are actually parasitic diseases which could explain chicken pox contagion and also explain why ivermectin is proving so effective against so many faux viruses/diseases. if the chicken pox condition is caused by an external skin parasite these parasites could reasonably be expected, and likely proven if effort is made, to infect others via contact. conversely, chicken pox could be an allergic reaction to something just as people react to poison oak and how it's contagious while the oils are still present
Take a fluid sample from a sick person (blood, urine, snot), find the virus within, and remove it from the fluid. That is isolation.
Then, "clean off" any material clinging to the virus, so that ONLY the virus is in the petri dish. That is purification.
This process can be, and is, done with bacteria.
But this process has NEVER been done with ANY virus.
What do you tell people who say that there have been viruses isolated and who give you links to pubmed and such?
You know how the CDC has recently changed he definition of the word "vaccine" to define it as something that it has never been defined as?
They are doing the same thing with the word "isolation."
They are claiming that if you take someone's body fluid (blood, urine, snot), and you ADD TO THAT some monkey kidney cells, some human aborted fetal cells, some cow blood cells, some antibiotics, and other things, then THAT is what they are calling "isolated" because that body fluid (blood, urine, snot) came from one person. But they ADDED a bunch of other things to it.
They NEVER found a virus within that soup. Instead, they add antibiotics to kill the cells, and then when the cells die, they claim there was a virus in there that (a) killed the cells in the lab petri dish and (b) was inside the person and it was what made them sick.
The ENTIRE "science" of virology is a SCAM.
Watch that video I posted above. Tom Cowan does a great job of explaining it.
It will blow your mind when you find out what they call "isolation." Their claim of isolation is a LIE.
I think what we’re debating is not whether “virus/viral particle” are real. But whether they are naturally occurring or man made. I can buy that virus are all man made engineered poisons given to us via vax or food or whatever delivery mechanism. Virus being man made is not that hard to believe since their life cycle is bizarre. It’s literally just genetic code injected into another cell.
However another point about them not being to “isolate” a pure form of the “virus”. Virus can’t really survive on their own. They always need a host cell to “hijack”. So I can believe that “viruses” are man made “chemicals” and have to be injected (via shots or food) into people. Ie they could have been poisoning all of us via vaccines and creating all these diseases.
I guess what rubs me the wrong way is when people say there is no “virus” is it implies people aren’t getting sick or that the disease isn’t real.
Yes, that is exactly what we are debating: whether or not viruses are real.
I am saying that the particles that virologists see in an electron microscope are NOT what they claim to be. They are nothing more than artifacts of dead cells. Those dead cells were caused by the process the virologist used to look at them in the first place.
Those particles (i.e. "the virus") did NOT EXIST in the body before the virologist went through the steps in the lab. Watch the video I posted above.
Viruses do not exist in the human (or any other animal's) body. They are figments of the virologist's imagination, and are created by the virologist in the lab, when posioning the cells of the thing they are studying.
It is possible that bioweapons are engineered in labs, and they are called viruses. But those things have to be injected into a person in order to make them sick. Maybe they are also working on aerosol versions, but according to many who are discussing this, it has to be injected into the blood, in order to bypass any natural pathway that would be used by nature (breathing in, for example), because the human body will kill it in that case.
There is NO genetic code found in SARS-CoV-2. The so-called "genetic sequence" used for the "test" to determine if someone has it was made in a computer program. It was NEVER taken from a sample of the "virus" because there is NO sample of the virus -- anywhere in the world. You cannot take a genetic code from something if you don't have a sample of it in the first place.
You can't prove that. It is pure speculation, and no virologist has ever proven it.
It also cannot be true. Because the narrative is that one person has the virus, sneezes, it floats out into the air, hangs around, and then someone else breaths it in, and it causes them to get sick.
If they"can't really survive on their own," then how do they go from one person to another? They can't. So, this unproven narrative is pure speculation, and cannot be true.
It scares the shit out of people, though. And that is probably the purpose of this narrative.
Again, more speculation. Nobody has EVER proven that -- for ANY virus.
This is not a valid way of looking at it. I understand. Before I looked into this, I would have agreed with you. But that is because this thinking is mistaken.
There is (a) the "virus" and then, there is (b) the sickness (which is claimed to be caused by the virus).
The sickness of measles is claimed to be caused by a virus, which is conveniently called the "measles virus." Polio is a sickness, which is claimed to be caused by a virus, which is conveniently called the "polio virus." Covid-19 is a sickness, which is claimed to be caused by a virus called SARS-CoV-2.
These are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. There is (a) the virus, and then there is (b) the sickness.
I am NOT saying that people do not get sick. They do. I've been sick -- more than once, with something claimed to be caused by a virus (colds, flu, chicken pox, etc.).
But that does NOT mean these sicknesses are caused by viruses. If viruses do not exist, then it follows that these sicknesses are caused by SOMETHING ELSE.
Nobody is studying what the something else might be. Nobody is studying this because they all buy into the idea that it is all caused by viruses, so there is no reason to study anything else.
That is the big mistake.
The people debunking virology say that these illnesses are caused by malnutrition and/or external environmental poisons and/or natural detoxification processes in the body. The sicknesses are real, but they are not caused by imaginary viruses.
Again, watch the video:
https://odysee.com/@lancewdetrick:b/IA---Germ-Theory-is-nonsense---no-virus-has-ever-caused-disease---Dr-Tom-Cowan---Jerm-Warfare:9
beyond this there's theories that many so called viruses are actually parasitic diseases which could explain chicken pox contagion and also explain why ivermectin is proving so effective against so many faux viruses/diseases. if the chicken pox condition is caused by an external skin parasite these parasites could reasonably be expected, and likely proven if effort is made, to infect others via contact. conversely, chicken pox could be an allergic reaction to something just as people react to poison oak and how it's contagious while the oils are still present