Jehovah Witness are misguided by Cabal, as all organized religion is.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
The Deep State has infiltrated many religious denominations. They have produced contaminated Bible translations that dilute the power of God, obfuscate the relationship of Jesus Christ to God and minimize certain sinful lifestyles.
I have produced a document that outlines what the satanists have done to corrupt the Holy Bible. You can see it here.
I urge everyone to return to using a King James version Bible. It is the only Bible version that is not copyrighted. God has preserved it but the devil's minions have tried to replace it with their corrupted "translations".
Serious question for you - Is King James most accurate? I have heard many people debate after the apocrypha was removed if any versions are accurate. I have seen still others claim that Bible editing has gone back as far as the time of Constantine. Curious what is believed to be the most complete and accurate version with nothing redacted or removed?
The King James version is written in the English current at the time. Additional scrolls have been discovered and translated, improving on the accuracy of a modern English Bible translation. To say that the King James version is the only authentic Bible translation is like saying, "Well, your Bible is in French, and therefore, invalid". Yes, there are some modern versions that tweak some verses to slightly change what may be the original intent. I use an NIV Bible, which is probably the most thoroughly researched version out, and written in modern English, so much more understandable than middle English. Of course, you need to be able to read Greek to get the original version of New Testament texts, but not too many people can do that. Old Testament texts are subject to much less certainty, but we have to go with what we have.
The NIV is corrupted, friend.
The NIV translation is based on the Nestle-Aland text. which is a combination of Tischendorf's Codex Sinaiticus (rediscovered in a Catholic convent wastepaper basket), Westcott and Hort's manuscripts (based on Codex Vaticanus, a Roman Catholic preserved Alexandrian bible), and Richard Francis Weymouth's The Resultant Greek Testament. These manuscripts were Alexandrian manuscripts and are written in classical Greek.
What I can tell you is that the KJV is based on the Masoretic text (Hebrew Old Testament) and Textus Receptus (Koine Greek New Testament) preserved by Orthodox Christians who fled the Roman Catholic inquisitors and the Muslim invaders of Constantinople.
In fact, I can use the NIV Bible to prove the Alexandrian scripts were corrupted, because the "fact-checkers" didn't realize they needed to edit these passages too! Pay close attention to Acts 6:8-14 in the passage below for mention of the Alexandrians and their role in falsely accusing and turning Stephen over to the Sanhedrin.
Acts 6:1-12
1 In those days when the number of disciples was increasing, the Hellenistic Jews[a] among them complained against the Hebraic Jews because their widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. 2 So the Twelve gathered all the disciples together and said, “It would not be right for us to neglect the ministry of the word of God in order to wait on tables. 3 Brothers and sisters, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them 4 and will give our attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.”
5 This proposal pleased the whole group. They chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit; also Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas from Antioch, a convert to Judaism. 6 They presented these men to the apostles, who prayed and laid their hands on them.
7 So the word of God spread. The number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly, and a large number of priests became obedient to the faith.
Stephen Seized
8 Now Stephen, a man full of God’s grace and power, performed great wonders and signs among the people. 9 Opposition arose, however, from members of the Synagogue of the Freedmen (as it was called)—Jews of Cyrene and Alexandria as well as the provinces of Cilicia and Asia—who began to argue with Stephen. 10 But they could not stand up against the wisdom the Spirit gave him as he spoke.
11 Then they secretly persuaded some men to say, “We have heard Stephen speak blasphemous words against Moses and against God.”
12 So they stirred up the people and the elders and the teachers of the law. They seized Stephen and brought him before the Sanhedrin. 13 They produced false witnesses, who testified, “This fellow never stops speaking against this holy place and against the law. 14 For we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs Moses handed down to us.”
Koine Greek was the Greek of the common people and understood throughout the Roman Empire. Classical Greek was only understood by the scholars AKA the academics.
Which version of Greek do you think the Apostles and early Christians would logically have chosen to spread the Gospel message to as many people as possible based on the above information?
If your answer to this question is the same as mine, you'll see why I choose translations based on the Textus Receptus, which include the KJV.
Now, the King James is not perfect. The translators didn't know what a certain word meant so they translated it as unicorn.
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h7214/kjv/wlc/0-1/
With that being said, the word doesn't affect any doctrinal statements and the meaning is "probably the great aurochs or wild bulls which are now extinct. The exact meaning is not known."
The 3-page preface to my NIV is pretty thorough in explaining how it was done through a large group from many denominations. Any attempt to alter the truth would seem to be pretty rare. I'll take my ability to understand 99.99% of the same text better, because it's in modern English, in exchange for the POSSIBLE mis-translation of a VERY minor portion of the Bible.
For me it is the King James version all the way. It is a word for word translation that is uncorrupted by the Westcott-Hort translation of the New Testament in the 1800's.
The OT is something you can be reasonably sure is honest. Too many copies made since the Jews were commanded that every male write their own Torah scroll.
The NT is harder. When reading, read with the Interlinear handy. Use Biblehub.com for s clickable link to each word and its translation and othet instances it is found in the scriptures.
Hebrews 4:9 is translated incorrectly in the KJV.
When reading the NT look for inconsistencies between books and verses.
There is controversy surrounding Matthew 28:19 which presents the trinitarian baptismal formula. This formula is not repeated anywhere else in the Bible.
Hebrews 4:9
9 there doth remain, then, a sabbatic rest to the people of God,
That's from Young's Literal Translation, which is based on the Textus Receptus NT as well. It appears the KJV translators didn't include the sabbatic part of that verse, although it's gleaned from the context.
I still swear by the KJV for reasons stated above.
I bought The Hebrew Bible by Robert Alter and The New Oxford Annotated Bible New Revised Standard Edition With The Apocrypha.
The Apocrypha is written in Greek. What type of stupid kike are you to buy a heeb bible to read the Greek New New Testament of Jesus Christ?
This book presented a simple and down-to-earth argument (for me anyway) that the KJV is the most convincing English version of the Bible.
https://archive.org/details/sam-gipp-the-answer-book-a-helpful-book-for-christians/
I know a family of Jehovah's witnesses, I used to be best friends with one. They were cool before Trump. Then I discovered how leftist they are.
Literally found out about it on cuckbook (before I left cuckbook for good), he went to the Women's Pussy hat march where Madonna said she would blow up the Trump White House. I told him how retarded he and his wife are.
His brother works for left wing Hollywood in California. I said peace out, bros. Haven't talked to them for a while now. Sold their souls. Maybe one day they will turn around.
Good pdf 👍
Why would someone want a translation that is to afraid to use God's name, be it any translation or version of his name?
Your name checks out.
The Cabal voted on what would constitute your bible at the Council of Nicea. What you believe to be the complete and total truth was put together by a group of men.
Don't Christians find this disturbing at all?
They conveniently left out all the books that address life as a journey of awakening and connecting with God without an intermediary, such as the Book of Thomas. They also voted on whether Christ was a man who was divinely inspired or divinity incarnate. Divinity incarnate won the roll call.
Because it is consistent with OT and NT that Jesus was uniquely God-man, because without being fully God and man. God has no part in the sacrifice, but when God is the one being sacrificed through Jesus it makes much more sense. Think the binding of Issac. Also that God would make good His promise of redemption with Himself by His own hand. It also solves the problem of evil, in that "why does God allow bad things to happen?" - who answers for God allowance of imperfection only God can make that kind of sacrifice. He died to reconcile a creation broken by allowed autonomy to Himself.