Yeah, he's been getting slapped around quite a bit on here of late, but I have no problem with anything he wrote here. The way he wrote it will redpill those select normies on the left who are inclined to read the actual Q drops and form their own assessment apart from what the loony carnival barkers of the media say.
An anon is someone who engages with Q on an anon basis. Plenty of people know who I am, just as plenty of people know who you are. Heck, some of them may very well be participating here.
But do they know that you = tstr? Probably not. Likewise, of many who know who I am in real life, virtually none know who Fractalizing Iron is.
two:
Point is, linguistically speaking, the expression "anon" is derived from the word "anonymous" but it is by no means synonymous with anonymous. It has a new, generated meaning and therefore occupies a different place semantically within the English lexicon.
(Linguistanon here. "semantics" is in fact the field that deals with the identification of "meaning" in linguistic structures.)
Lin is ABSOLUTELY correct in his assessment of "QAnon"
Yeah, he's been getting slapped around quite a bit on here of late, but I have no problem with anything he wrote here. The way he wrote it will redpill those select normies on the left who are inclined to read the actual Q drops and form their own assessment apart from what the loony carnival barkers of the media say.
Well yes, except that he is not an "anon" by definition. We know who he is. I know that is semantics but, just sayin...
i heard you like namefagging, so we made you a famefag while you namefag
Im both personally. xD
Dubs
We're all namefags here.
But does having an avatar make me a famefag? Because I never asked for this. I just logged in one day and got a beautiful pepe.
right. he may very well too, or at least read and that would qualify. Just weird to see someone call them self an anon...
Yeah, who knows which one of us is ACTUALLY Lin Wood. As an anon. KEK.
Just to be clear at this point, I am declaring that I am not Lin Wood.
Exactly. We don’t need an anon vs Qanon Q pronoun debate. SMH
Yah, nah.
one:
An anon is someone who engages with Q on an anon basis. Plenty of people know who I am, just as plenty of people know who you are. Heck, some of them may very well be participating here.
But do they know that you = tstr? Probably not. Likewise, of many who know who I am in real life, virtually none know who Fractalizing Iron is.
two:
Point is, linguistically speaking, the expression "anon" is derived from the word "anonymous" but it is by no means synonymous with anonymous. It has a new, generated meaning and therefore occupies a different place semantically within the English lexicon.
(Linguistanon here. "semantics" is in fact the field that deals with the identification of "meaning" in linguistic structures.)
100% agree! All anons know there is NO, NADA, NOT A qanon in existence!
This all started when the MSM had to label us as something terrible. Do we really care? Not me. Their fuckery means nothing to me.
I do prefer to be called an Anon though. But f feelings. We just got own it. We can’t make it look like we care about pronouns.
Yep. We all know this. QAnon shaman wizard an example.