Wouldn't it be way cheaper to give free antibody testing to determine the actual extent of herd immunity rather than creating all this chaos based on mere guesswork?
It would appear that "They" don't want those numbers to be known....
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Here's a similar question:
Why don't they test everyone for antibodies before initially offering them the vax?
All the people with antibodies were likely immune already.
Their intent is to get ss many people as possible dependant on the next booster to stay alive.
Antibodies dissipate with time, so it would probably not be a realistic measure. Those with a healthy immune system will then have memory cells, that will produce the same antibodies again, once a pathogen has been recognized. If antibodies stayed, the blood would be full of them over time.
It is said that those who had the original SARS-CoV 15 years ago, have memory cells that have an 80% probability of recognizing SARS-CoV-2.
Chaos was the goal all along.
It's not about health or a virus
Logic Is Dead.
CDC has actively discouraged antibody testing. It would reveal how flimsiness and short-livedness of the protection from the mRNA.
My best friend got Pfizer in March/April.
He had the antibody test yesterday. Igm negative IgG Covid antibody positive, but “it’s an extremely week positive.” Followed by an offer to give the booster.
What gives big pharma and hospitals more money? Antibody tests won't injure, sterilize and kill people. No depopulation in just testing.