US Government & Jan 6 Committee has shown they can arrest and/or subpoena anyone for anything - why can't they get "Q?"
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Comments (17)
sorted by:
They cannot find Q. Anywhere.
No arrest.
No charges.
No subpoena.
No back-trace.
No intelligence of who "Q" actually is.
No (successful) attempt to locate and "bring to justice" someone the Federal Government considers a cult leader.
Why not?
How Government handles an actual threat: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/un-sounds-alarm-over-extrajudicial-killings-in-the-talibans-afghanistan/ar-AAROisN?ocid=uxbndlbing
How Government handles a perceived threat: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/10/politics/list-january-6-subpoenas/index.html
How Government handles an online troll: https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/defendant-sentenced-online-threats
How Government handles Q: ... "Evil QAnon!!!"
Not just some autistic dweeb on 4chan, is it?
Nope.
Nope.
Someone that can't be found in spite of 100% of the world's greatest spy tech being used to track them.
Turns out Q is Jill Biden, who's tired of changing diapers lol
I think it's more like...
They know exactly who and where at least the group behind the Q presence.
And they know that if they get anywhere near that location, they all die.
And every one that sent them dies. And every one that those scumbags worked for dies.
They're stuck in the "don't start none wont be none" mode.
So, they sit on their hands, knowing they're dead anyway but their deaths are still off in the short and growing shorter time distance rather than right now, today.
The House of representatives and their committees cannot arrest anyone. They can only refer their findings to the DOJ.
Bullshit. They have the authority to do so.
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/verify-can-congress-arrest-you-for-ignoring-subpoena/65-de8e6d10-2051-4d3e-9f75-f475a7c199b5
Now what's your purpose here?
UPDATE!
u/tewdryg is a goalpost moving faggot who doesn't want to admit he was wrong. Go figure.
Start point:
Proof provided.
u/tewdryg Goalpost move #1:
Words highlighted.
u/tewdryg Goalpost move #2:
Example provided. Example ignored by u/tewdryg
u/tewdryg Goalpost move #3:
We have some really, really fucking stupid people in this community.
u/tewdryg, get used to being wrong, LOSER.
But have they recently? If they had, it would be front page news worldwide.
The Sergeant at Arms is a State House actor for Congressional grounds. You didn't read the entire link you provided. It also says-- "However, law experts tell the Verify team that this is highly unlikely". In other words the Sergeant At Arms to arrest and detain anyone is dubious and very questionable.
That you took the bait laid out in front of you. The article points out that legally, I am correct. In very few, very simple words. This specific article was chosen because I wanted to know "your purpose here."
Try to do better than grasping for whatever you can in a vain attempt to be right. It's sickening, and our movement deserves far better representation than what we have now. Admit when you make a mistake and own up to it - you are not special. It's such a shame to me when my children act more mature than grown, married fucking adults. Get your shit together bro.
Alright then. Provide me one example in which the Sergeant at Arms arrested someone. Come on I'm waiting...............
Moving the goalposts again, retard?
You can read the story of Mally Daugherty.
Or you can watch the Texas Sergeant at Arms presenting warrants preparing for arrests.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/08/12/watch-texas-house-democrats-served-arrest-warrants/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/05/15/house-has-power-arrest-people-who-defy-its-orders/
Again - you're wrong, and moving goalposts isn't going to change that, you stupid son of a bitch.
Now your name calling? But still can't provide one case of the Sergeant at Arms being used to arrest former Administration officials. I'm still waiting.
"Now your name calling?"
What does his name calling have to do with anything?
Oh wait...you're unliterate...got it.
Because they would have to admit he is real.
Q doesn’t exist on this plane of existence. The government can’t capture someone who lives with god in his kingdom. I’m not exactly sure who Q is but I believe he is a divine being from another realm
K