For full clarification, I think every one of these secret societies (Freemasonry, Knight's Templar, Illuminati, Jesuits, etc.) started with good intentions.
But the same parasites that infest everything infiltrated and had their way with these secret societies, as they are wont to do.
Even knitting groups, when they go on for too long, turn into a cliquish gossip-fueled fever dream.
You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.
Mainstream readings yes I agree. Plain, solid hermeneutics, no.
The Truth of Jesus Christ is for everyone and is public through the reading of scripture.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
We have early papyrus fragments and even a full codex of the Greek that match...pre Nicene Council.
The scriptures "approved" for canon were already in use in bodies of believers at the time. Many 2nd century believers like the bishop Irenaeus and Polycarp wrote about the usage of the 4 gospels.
There are more than good reasons to reject books like the Book of Thomas which were written 2nd century or later.
The esoteric idea that there are "hidden" books is largely a narrative pushed by people like Dan Brown who serve freemasonry or their ideology. See all the masonic symbols in his work for instance.
Do they contain details about location, etc that lend credibility to it being an account of what happened? Try reading the Quran sometime and you will see a similar problem. Jesus in those fanfiction works is often a "floating head" of wisdom with no physical location described.
Since you agree Jesus called himself the "Son of Man",
what does "Son of Man" refer to in the Old Testament?
What does Jesus say about the Son of Man in Matthew 12:8, Mark 2:28, Luke 6:5? Is that a title reserved for the one true God?
Is there anything else in Matthew, Mark, Luke that Jesus does, that only God can do? Like forgive sins. I once tried to read through Matthew with my Muslim friend and he couldn't get past Matthew 9 because he understands the implication of Jesus forgiving sins.
What do the demons call Jesus in Matthew 8?
Who is The Angel of the LORD in the Old Testament? Does He have a physical body? How do people react and talk to Him?
They may have viewed themselves as vigilantes at first. Many initiates still do.
But the path to hell is paved with good intentions.
Eventually, the infrastructure they built became equally adept at committing the crimes as it was at preventing them. (Think FBI)
All it took was one bad guy to infiltrate it and manipulate the organization to cater toward his own desires rather than the goals in the organization's charter.
The movie Wanted, for example, explores this theme.
SPOILERS, Look at what Sloan did. The assassination organization was originally built around assassinating people that the "threads of fate" deemed evil and necessary for elimination in order to save lives. When Sloan's own name came up in the "threads of fate", he manipulated the organization of assassins to target innocents in order to further his own wealth. The assassins operated under the assumption they were the good guys doing good things, only to discover at the end that they were being used the entire time.
It isn't just that secret societies can get corrupted by power; all organizations are susceptible to corruption. What's wrong with secret societies is that they are "secret" to begin with.
Every organization that hides in the shadows cannot protect themselves from infiltration or corruption because there is no public sector to ensure checks and balances. Any organization without accountability under those they claim to serve is doomed to being taken over by parasites with little resistance.
Transparency is key. No more closed meetings. If you can't discuss things you're doing in society out in the open, then you shouldn't be doing those things.
You have to read between the lines with [their] printed histories. Use the same type of discernment when reading those that you do when reading "news" articles from MSM sites. It's not so much what's printed, bit what can be inferred if you know what to look for.
Those groups live under th Law of Duality. That's all you need to know about how "good" [their] intentions are. Look at the collective histories of those groups for proof.
Its actually because of the Taxil Hoax which while proven to be one big joke by a guy back in the 1800s people still wanted to believe in the hoax and false accusations live on to this day and if they didnt address them people would just say “ no matter how much you ask, masons wont answer the question about satanism! This proves theyre sinister!”.
Page -28- John Quincy Adams was the only president to serve in the lower house after his term in the White House; he represented his Massachusetts district for 17 years.
I have a cousin who's a 32°. He calls Lucifer, "The Prince of Peace," "Father of Understanding," "Prince of Light," and "The Northern Star." He doesn't have to tell me outright that he's a Luciferian for me to know that's what he is. Only a Luciferian would call The Enemy the "Prince of Light," etc. He's also supremely racist, is a eugenicist, and believes our family are rightful princes/princesses of the Aryan Race because we traced our lineage back to Scandanavian Viking Earls (Yarls).
So, there's a lot Freemasons believe, and can be confirmed, without having to hear specific words/phrases come out of [their] mouths.
For full clarification, I think every one of these secret societies (Freemasonry, Knight's Templar, Illuminati, Jesuits, etc.) started with good intentions.
But the same parasites that infest everything infiltrated and had their way with these secret societies, as they are wont to do.
Even knitting groups, when they go on for too long, turn into a cliquish gossip-fueled fever dream.
Mainstream readings yes I agree. Plain, solid hermeneutics, no.
The Truth of Jesus Christ is for everyone and is public through the reading of scripture.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
We have early papyrus fragments and even a full codex of the Greek that match...pre Nicene Council.
The scriptures "approved" for canon were already in use in bodies of believers at the time. Many 2nd century believers like the bishop Irenaeus and Polycarp wrote about the usage of the 4 gospels.
There are more than good reasons to reject books like the Book of Thomas which were written 2nd century or later.
The esoteric idea that there are "hidden" books is largely a narrative pushed by people like Dan Brown who serve freemasonry or their ideology. See all the masonic symbols in his work for instance.
Here's the problem, answer these questions:
When were the dozens of other gospels written?
Do they contain first-hand eye witness accounts?
Do they contain details about location, etc that lend credibility to it being an account of what happened? Try reading the Quran sometime and you will see a similar problem. Jesus in those fanfiction works is often a "floating head" of wisdom with no physical location described.
Since you agree Jesus called himself the "Son of Man", what does "Son of Man" refer to in the Old Testament?
What does Jesus say about the Son of Man in Matthew 12:8, Mark 2:28, Luke 6:5? Is that a title reserved for the one true God?
Is there anything else in Matthew, Mark, Luke that Jesus does, that only God can do? Like forgive sins. I once tried to read through Matthew with my Muslim friend and he couldn't get past Matthew 9 because he understands the implication of Jesus forgiving sins.
What do the demons call Jesus in Matthew 8?
Who is The Angel of the LORD in the Old Testament? Does He have a physical body? How do people react and talk to Him?
What does scripture say about sorcerers?
all of this started with the desire to gain power that is never good intentions
Not necessarily.
They may have viewed themselves as vigilantes at first. Many initiates still do.
But the path to hell is paved with good intentions.
Eventually, the infrastructure they built became equally adept at committing the crimes as it was at preventing them. (Think FBI)
All it took was one bad guy to infiltrate it and manipulate the organization to cater toward his own desires rather than the goals in the organization's charter.
The movie Wanted, for example, explores this theme.
SPOILERS, Look at what Sloan did. The assassination organization was originally built around assassinating people that the "threads of fate" deemed evil and necessary for elimination in order to save lives. When Sloan's own name came up in the "threads of fate", he manipulated the organization of assassins to target innocents in order to further his own wealth. The assassins operated under the assumption they were the good guys doing good things, only to discover at the end that they were being used the entire time.
It isn't just that secret societies can get corrupted by power; all organizations are susceptible to corruption. What's wrong with secret societies is that they are "secret" to begin with.
Every organization that hides in the shadows cannot protect themselves from infiltration or corruption because there is no public sector to ensure checks and balances. Any organization without accountability under those they claim to serve is doomed to being taken over by parasites with little resistance.
Transparency is key. No more closed meetings. If you can't discuss things you're doing in society out in the open, then you shouldn't be doing those things.
Every organization with influence and reach has been infiltrated by the enemy.
Evils never sleeps.
Good people are apparently ridiculously difficult to wake.
You have to read between the lines with [their] printed histories. Use the same type of discernment when reading those that you do when reading "news" articles from MSM sites. It's not so much what's printed, bit what can be inferred if you know what to look for.
Those groups live under th Law of Duality. That's all you need to know about how "good" [their] intentions are. Look at the collective histories of those groups for proof.
Yeah I am not buying it. Definitely Satanic.
"What gave us away?"
"idk, maybe that huge image of Baphomet"
I am surprised it is not 66 OR 666 articles.
I haven't seen this posted here in awhile... Australia's X-factor winner revealing Freemason satanic secrets. It's really good, though a bit long. 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Eeo-82Eac8
Good video. I have watched this before
What's the saying go?
"A good theif never tells anyone he doesn't steal?"
Not only are they evil, they're being terrible at it.
Its actually because of the Taxil Hoax which while proven to be one big joke by a guy back in the 1800s people still wanted to believe in the hoax and false accusations live on to this day and if they didnt address them people would just say “ no matter how much you ask, masons wont answer the question about satanism! This proves theyre sinister!”.
speaking of satanism & antimasonic;
Devout Christian, John Q Adams was member of the antimasonic party and he served in the House of Representatives for 17 years🇺🇸
From Jfk Jr's George Magazine Book of Political Lists...
https://archive.org/details/bookofpoliticall00eski/mode/2up?q=17+
Page -28- John Quincy Adams was the only president to serve in the lower house after his term in the White House; he represented his Massachusetts district for 17 years.
I have a cousin who's a 32°. He calls Lucifer, "The Prince of Peace," "Father of Understanding," "Prince of Light," and "The Northern Star." He doesn't have to tell me outright that he's a Luciferian for me to know that's what he is. Only a Luciferian would call The Enemy the "Prince of Light," etc. He's also supremely racist, is a eugenicist, and believes our family are rightful princes/princesses of the Aryan Race because we traced our lineage back to Scandanavian Viking Earls (Yarls).
So, there's a lot Freemasons believe, and can be confirmed, without having to hear specific words/phrases come out of [their] mouths.